I mean was there any way to figure it out before? Someone at work said it was in a book before but I don't think it was...Originally Posted by Jenny1124
who has the doe as a Patronus is revealed in this book, Deathly Hallows
I mean was there any way to figure it out before? Someone at work said it was in a book before but I don't think it was...Originally Posted by Jenny1124
who has the doe as a Patronus is revealed in this book, Deathly Hallows
As far as I knew I don't think we ever saw Snape's Patronis. If we did, I believe it was before Lilly died so it had it's prior form.Originally Posted by kluchetta
I mean was there any way to figure it out before? Someone at work said it was in a book before but I don't think it was...
I don't think it was, either. If James's Patronus was a stag, though, it would be logical for Lily's to have been a doe.Originally Posted by kluchetta
I mean was there any way to figure it out before? Someone at work said it was in a book before but I don't think it was...
I totally agree.. We were never advised on what type of patronus Lilly had nor what Snape had.Originally Posted by kluchetta
I've been asking around, and my sister, who's really into HP, says that it's her opinion that we were never told about the doe Patronus. That makes me feel better that we didn't figure it out. PLUS, I just read all 6 prior books since June - I thought I would have caught that!
I think his was always a doe, because he always loved Lily. I could be wrong thoughOriginally Posted by Libby'sMom
I'm wondering if Snape's Patronus was always a doe? It seemed weird that they mentioned in the book that Tonks patronus was different because of all that was going on with her and Remus.
Maybe Snape's patronus was different but when Lily died his patronus took on a different form.
I have to go back and read more closely to see if they give a hint about Lily's patronus.
Agreed. I have read each book more than once and I have never heard of Lily's or Snape's patronus being mentioned.Originally Posted by angelkitty
I totally agree.. We were never advised on what type of patronus Lilly had nor what Snape had.
you mean the dursley's rightOriginally Posted by Duchess15
I just finished reading the book last night. All in all, I liked it. A lot of what happened I predicted or had a feeling it would. I was really upset about Hedwig dying, but could understand why.
Aberforth completely surprised me that he was the owner of the Hog's Head. I had hated Snape for a long time, never knowing whose side he was really on, but don't believe he deserved to die the way he did. I am glad she tied that all up nicely and showed us Snape for who he really was.
The big battle was very complex and just full of nerves. Just wondering who would live and who would die. I kind of figured Lupin would die...she had finally killed off the last true friend and connection of his father.
I was so proud of Neville! I had grown to like him very much and am glad to see that he was able to stand up for what he believed in and fight like a true hero. I was also saddened by Fred's death, and had not expected it to be one of the twins. I'm also glad to see that Percy got some sense back and did finally come back to fight.
I knew when I read that Harry died, that he really hadn't. I just had that feeling. I was also glad to find that Dumbledore really was human and good and not as he once may have been.
I was glad for the epilogue, but it left so many questions unanswered. I wanted to know what had happened to the other teachers and the weasleys. Whatever happened to the dudleys? What are Ron and Harry doing for a living? How is George coping without Fred? There are so many. She has talked about possible continuations for characters and I hope she does.
Yeah...lol Guess I was on a roll..Originally Posted by Renovia
you mean the dursley's right
She also said that she tried to include most of this in the epilogue, but started sounding bad and like she was cramming too much infomation into it. So she left most of it out and decided to eventually publish it separtely, but has no plans on starting it right away.She did have some juicy new tidbits for us though:
1) Harry and Ron revolutionized the Auror's office.
2) Hermoine is now at a "high level position" in the Ministry's magical law enforcement wing.
3) The new headmaster is not McGonagall because she is too old. It's somebody "new".
4) Victore is definitely Fleur and Bill's kid.
5) Neville's parents are still in St. Mungo's.
6) Lupin and Tonks were killed off in exchange for Mr. Weasley's life.
That's too bad, because while we did get a few tidbits about their future, still I had questions. I wish she would have written it less chaotic as to me it was just a blur of words.Originally Posted by Telynn
She also said that she tried to include most of this in the epilogue, but started sounding bad and like she was cramming too much infomation into it. So she left most of it out and decided to eventually publish it separtely, but has no plans on starting it right away.