- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,303
- Purraise
- 2
2 cats is better than one cat.
They can play with each other and keep each other's company.
They can play with each other and keep each other's company.
Hehe... Don't know if you read it, but this woman here in VA did... Not a good idea...Originally Posted by wertonkinese
right now i only have 2 cats, but i wish i could have 100!
That has always been a dream of mine too! I want 4 cats in a 2 story house with a room just for them.Originally Posted by Aussie_Dog
I believe 2 is the minimum, but I would prefer a whole lot more. ATM, 2 is more than enough, but I dream of a day when people down the street refer to me as "that crazy cat lady"
3 cats isn't exactly multi-cat, but these three sure got along great! They loved to lay together in the "cat" chair, and would often groom each other. The two on the bottom were raised together since kittenhood. The one on top (Jill) was an extremely shy foster kitty. They weren't always together, but they definitely enjoyed each others company!Originally Posted by Purr
I've also read research that said cats aren't pack animals like dogs, and therefore are stressed out when "competing" with a bunch of other cats. I saw it on Oprah too. The fighting, aloofness, and timidness some cats exhibit when in large multi-cat homes is proof that they don't like it. He said he's seen normal, well-adjusted cats turn fierce or shy when around that many other cats. Space is also an issue. Cats need lots of room to roam around, like they would in the wild. Because of that, I would never subject cats to "community living" unless I absolutely had to--like to foster until I found them suitable homes.