OK, I won't mind.EDIT: andddd of course I should have read the rest of the thread before replying X__X
neverminddddd
But I would like to say this, just to clear up what I think:
At first, I thought that the difference between the 12% and 2% might be accounted for by lifestyle differences, but that doesn't make sense. Now I think that it's a matter of the nature of the study and that the 12% would be a skewed result if they were trying to say that it's what a cat in the wild would eat naturally.