Interesting visit to the vet...

auntie crazy

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Feb 4, 2006
Messages
2,435
Purraise
61

mschauer

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
6,753
Purraise
2,338
Location
Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by Auntie Crazy

Because it's a fact that vets do profit from commercial pet food sales, as even veterinarian organizations acknowledge, nor is that the only ethical issue:

Some reading:
Dolittler: How do vets recommend pet food? (Part 2: Education)

Canadian Veterinary Medical Association Journal: Veterinary Medical Ethics

Avocacy for Animals: Conflicts of Interest in the Veterinary Profession and the Origin of “Man-Made” Dog and Cat Diseases.
*Very* interesting links.

You know, profits and conflict in interest issues aside, vets have little choice but to sell prescription foods. They are taught that the way to treat some ailments at least in part is with prescription foods. Since they don't receive significant training in nutrition, they wouldn't be able to suggest alternatives to the prescription foods even if they wanted to.

Just a random thought and probably just a different way to say what others have already said...
 

sweetpea24

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
568
Purraise
24
Location
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Well, yes you're right in a way because they don't get sufficient training. You think they would but since many nutrition courses are sponsored by the same companies producing the prescription foods, why wouldn't a vet school offer these courses?

I just wish vets would do some independent research. Well let me rephrase that. I wish there were long-term studies on all types of pet food, be it kibble, canned, homecooked or raw, low vs high premium brands etc. This may be a little unethical but I've seen some disturbing stuff on how some companies test their foods. If research such as this existed, then maybe more vets would be open to different ways of feeding. I just hate that when I ask, I get nothing but a canned response.
 
Top