- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 2,435
- Purraise
- 61
I agree that ingredients should be of primary concern to pet owners, and discussion/education of both what should and shouldn't be in the food - and why - along with the sleuthing needed to deduce actual contents from ingredients and analysis labels should be the topics of discussion. I look forward to the day the general public is so cognizant of the damage done to cats by kibble diets that we don't have to talk about it any more.Originally Posted by LDG
Ultimately, dry or wet, the fact of the matter is that MOST cat food, dry or wet, crap, premium, or ultra premium, has lots of ingredients cats don't need in their diet and wouldn't naturally eat. Cats can't even turn the beta carotene in carrots into Vitamin A. Cats don't have the necessary enzymes to process 72% of the fat in flax seed (which is 42% fat).
So IMO (I realize, wrong forum here LOL), the debate shouldn't be about wet vs. dry at all, but about what the best ingredients in cat food are.
What I'm wondering is why there isn't a canned cat food with mice as the main ingredient. Obviously, this is because it isn't appealing to people... but at this point, we're all becoming so much more educated about our cats' food... at least there's rabbit on the market.
I know there are pet stores that have begun refusing to sell kibble (I'm working on a local store owner right now; meeting with him tomorrow). And it's for sure the pet food industry is sensitive to the public's increasing awareness of the needs of obligate carnivores - look at how many raw food products have cropped up since 2007, not to mention the proliferation of low- and grain-free products. There will come a tipping point when enough of the public refuses to buy kibble that it'll lose it's profitability. It's a long-shot, but I hope to see kibble dropped from manufacturing lines in my lifetime. Now THAT would be something to celebrate!!!
AC