- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
- Messages
- 3
- Purraise
- 0
I just revisited that Weruva chart myself. Last year I compared Weruva's Paw Licken Chicken to Tiki Cat Puka Puka Chicken. I found that the Puka Puka Chicken had zero carbs, no potato starch, and more food in the can. I just compared it again and found the following:
Weruva Paw Lickin Chicken
Protein 64.7%
Fat 32.1%
Carbs 3.3%
Calories per can is 56 for the 3 ounce can
Tiki Cat Gourmet Whole Food Puka Puka Chicken
Protein 82%
Fat 12%
Carbs 0%
Calories per can is 85 calories for the 2.8 ounce can, so you get roughly 52% more food per can.
I will stick to Tiki Cat because it still beats Weruva on carbs and I am getting more for my money. Last time I checked, I think Weruva was higher priced too! In case you haven't noticed, most of the Weruva products are more like soup than a meal so you are paying for a lot of water plus many of the foods are still high in carbs. I would go with Tiki which is just a better product and value all around.
Weruva Paw Lickin Chicken
Protein 64.7%
Fat 32.1%
Carbs 3.3%
Calories per can is 56 for the 3 ounce can
Tiki Cat Gourmet Whole Food Puka Puka Chicken
Protein 82%
Fat 12%
Carbs 0%
Calories per can is 85 calories for the 2.8 ounce can, so you get roughly 52% more food per can.
I will stick to Tiki Cat because it still beats Weruva on carbs and I am getting more for my money. Last time I checked, I think Weruva was higher priced too! In case you haven't noticed, most of the Weruva products are more like soup than a meal so you are paying for a lot of water plus many of the foods are still high in carbs. I would go with Tiki which is just a better product and value all around.