- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #21
Yeah. Didn't even know there were any.
The "vegetarian" recipes aren't really vegetarian.Should the recipes on www.dogcathomeprepareddiet.com be supplemented with taurine? And should it be mentioned that the vegetarian recipes for cats aren't really appropriate?
And then he goes on to say how to prepare his pseudo vegetarian diets using non-vegetarian ingredients as needed.Cats have some unique nutritional needs that a strictly vegetarian diet cannot satisfy.
The nutrients that cats can only derive from animal sources are provided by supplements.Other than egg yolk and bone meal, I didn't see anything animal based...?
From the multivitamin, taurine, and calcium supplement? So the egg yolk is the only nutrition from a food source in the tofu recipe?The nutrients that cats can only derive from animal sources are provided by supplements.
A true vegetarian diet isn't appropriate because it can't provide all nutrients needed by a cat. His diets aren't vegetarian. They *do* provide all nutrients needed by a cat. It's just that the ones a cat ordinarily can only get from a whole animal source are instead coming from a bottle. Whether or not someone believes providing nutrients in that manner is appropriate is largely a matter of opinion. It isn't that different from the commercial processed providing a large amount of nutrients from supplements because the low quality ingredients either lack them are they are destroyed during hyper processing.I saw his comments about the diets, and caught the info about the supplements. But is meeting the needs of a cat the same thing as appropriate for a cat? I think it's worth mentioning that the vegetarian recipes are not species-appropriate.
I agree.I saw his comments about the diets, and caught the info about the supplements. But is meeting the needs of a cat the same thing as appropriate for a cat? I think it's worth mentioning that the vegetarian recipes are not species-appropriate.
Lets let people do their own thinking. The first post of the thread should be links to resources without any personal commentary. If we don't think Dr. Strombeck's recipes can be trusted it makes no sense to use the link at all. If that or any other link is included and anyone wants to object to something about it they can add a post to the thread.I get your point, and did before. But tofu is no more species-appropriate in a home cooked meal than soy is in a commercial food.
I agree.I'd much prefer to provide links to cooked recipes that don't include "vegetarian" options.
I agree also but unfortunately there just aren't a lot of sites with cooked recipes.That works.
I'd much prefer to provide links to cooked recipes that don't include "vegetarian" options.
I agree as well. If somewhere down the line a person asks about that site's meat-based recipes then they can be assured that their cats will be fine.That works.
But just to be clear, it's not that the recipes in general can't be trusted. And, quite frankly, we don't have a better resource. I'd much prefer to provide links to cooked recipes that don't include "vegetarian" options.
That's a good point. There really isn't nutritionally that much difference between a cooked diet and a raw one. I've notice that when the Alnutrin online calculator is used they recommend the same amount of their product whether you select cooked ingredients or raw ones. At least that has been true with the few test cases I've tried. Of course there is some nutritional difference. Some vitamins levels are reduced by cooking. But I think the differences are frequently exaggerated.The only difference between raw and home-cooked is the cooking. Other than making sure that people are aware of balancing the diet and to not feed cooked bones, I'm not sure how many more recipes there are.
Exactly, I completely agree! I think for some cats with digestive issues, cooked meat will be key for them.That's a good point. There really isn't nutritionally that much difference between a cooked diet and a raw one. I've notice that when the Alnutrin online calculator is used they recommend the same amount of their product whether you select cooked ingredients or raw ones. At least that has been true with the few test cases I've tried. Of course there is some nutritional difference. Some vitamins levels are reduced by cooking. But I think the differences are frequently exaggerated.
I am definitely going to give it a go with Perla. She would rather starve than eat anything raw and after a year and a half of it, I gave up with her or should I say, gave in. It is quite pitiful to see her antics AND quite dramatic and amusing all at the same time if it wasn't so frustrating and worrying. :lol3: I have found that all of my other five good raw eaters don't even care what I serve up to Perla. AND, Perla is always the very last one to stroll in for her "private" feedings. Everyone else is all done by then but Perkins (Piggins') is always waiting to see if Perla will eat and is more than willing to eat what she won't.Are you going to try to feed Perla a home cooked diet? I've got chicken thighs thawing right now and am going to bake them in a few minutes so she can have them for her late night meal .(since she's so hard to please) Luckily I already have the alnutrin w/ eggshell powder on hand, and even some chicken livers! Now here's hoping she will like the "concoction" . I think I'll leave the boys' diet alone, since they seem to like their raw just fine. Honestly, I'm afraid if I change anything, they might decide they prefer cooked to raw, and I think I prefer raw to cooked as my first option.
Larsen, together with Jonathan Stockman, a veterinarian and second-year resident in clinical nutrition at UC Davis, selected 200 recipes from 34 different sources, including veterinary textbooks, pet care books and web sites. They evaluated both the ingredients and the instructions for each recipe, using a computer-based program to quantify the nutritional content of the food described by each recipe, as well as the specificity of the instructions.
They found that only nine of the 200 recipes —including eight of the nine written by veterinarians — provided all essential nutrients in concentrations that met the minimum standards established for adult dogs by the Association of American Feed Control Officials, while only five recipes — all written by veterinarians — provided essential nutrients in concentrations that met the National Research Council’s Minimum Requirements for adult dogs.
Although recipes written by veterinarians were less likely to have any nutrient deficiencies — and those being less severe — most still had at least one deficiency. Interestingly, only four of the 200 recipes were written by board-certified veterinary nutritionists, and all of those four recipes had acceptable nutrient profiles for adult dogs.