I think it would be good to include some kind of general guideline (or at least observations) for cooked food feeding. As with raw, the amounts fed will be less than on an all-canned diet. How much less is very dependent on individual factors, but there should be something to note that it will be less food than they are used to feeding, so that they don't freak out about their cats not eating enough.On the removal of the enzyme piece, I guess we can just note before the USDA retention data link (following the energetic significance of cooking links) that raw feeders have found that they typically need to feed less food than their kitties were eating on canned; as cooked food requires less energy to digest it, those feeding home cooked may find that raw feeding guidelines for amounts to feed may not be similar for home cooked. ?????
How do you know that???As with raw, the amounts fed will be less than on an all-canned diet.
"Expect". "Should be".Why shouldn't we expect it to be? If I fed my cats the same amount of raw as they were eating canned, they'd all be beach balls. The food is more bioavailable, or takes less energy to digest so they burn less calories or something. All indications are that it should be the same with cooked. So why shouldn't people be alerted that they MAY need to feed less than they were on canned? I really can't see what the problem is with this - so they at least pay attention, or aren't freaked out about their kitties not eating enough. That one ounce of food in Flowerbelle's bowl looked so darn pitiful...