The answer is too simple....because cats and dogs don't vote, and most people are apathetic and blissfully ignorant about the pet overpopulation problem, therefore won't campaign for changes in legislation. Most states now have decent (felony provisions) laws regarding animal cruelty because of the truly heartwrenching stories that have been on the news/in the papers and have upset enough people that the legislators cared. Until the overpopulation problem isn't hushed up, and people can put faces with the millions killed every year in shelters, and the millions of ferals in the US alone, people don't think about it. They don't want to think about it - it's too sad! But like the abuse issue, until the people pressure the legislators enough, or until the legislators themselves see what the problem really is (and it's fiscal as well as in lives for the states...), there won't be stricter laws.Originally posted by jcat
Why aren't there more controls? The major problem is unchecked reproduction, so why aren't our legislators doing something about it? If they can make laws regarding who can enter the country, and imprison kids under 16 on suspicion of terrorism (or give them the death penalty), why can't they enact some laws protecting animals? Should we bombard our Congressmen or Congresswomen demanding some action?
So, essentially, YES we should bombard our local officials to change things!!!
(Yup, very strong feelings on this....I've been doing a lot of research for www.straypetadvocacy.org about the No-Kill Movement, and successful low-cost spay/neuter programs, and the most successful of those programs have state legislature backing them, funding them, and the euthanasia rates in shelters have dramatically reduced because of the low income spay/neuter initiatives....)