- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #41
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 130
- Purraise
- 15
In response to my own post, I started Vivian on Metronidazole about 6 weeks ago, and began a food transition to duck and pea a couple weeks after that. Took the transition slow, and she has been completely on the new food for at least a couple of weeks. If there has been any change in bowel movements it may be that they are somewhat less frequent than 4 or more in 24 hrs. and some of them are more formed.
But there is still trouble in the litter box. It is difficult to characterize her stool, because one bowel movement may contain a softly formed stool with loose or watery stool at the beginning and end of it, and fresh blood. I feel like it's time to move forward with treatment or diagnostics.
Originally I (think) I decided against biopsy because of its invasiveness/prep - don't want to put Vivian through that. I thought I would go straight to steroid if and when the time came. Now I have learned that the traveling radiologist (I live very rurally) with the ultrasound machine is coming to my vet's clinic this week for another animal so I could share the cost of his visit. In case someone says consult your vet, I have -
she says the gold standard for confirming IBD or cancer is biopsy but understands why I don't want to put the cat through that. She is very willing to go straight to steroid, but also recommends ultrasound before going to steroid to pick up any tumors that might be causing the bleeding. Originally she said she believed bleeding was from irritation from high frequency bowel movements. Now I don't think she's so sure about that, because she mentioned intestinal tumor. So I need to decide PDQ if I am going to go ahead with ultrasound. As you know, all of these procedures are expensive and like many of you I have spent a boat load of money in the past few months between Vivian's thyroid and then intestinal problems and my other cat's sinus problems. I don't want to do a test that won't change the treatment; on the other hand I don't want to miss an opportunity to get some information that will change the direction of treatment and benefit Vivian. In your experience, can ultrasound alone (without biopsy) detect a difference between IBD and a cancer and is it worth pursuing this instead of just initiating treatment with steroid?
thank you
But there is still trouble in the litter box. It is difficult to characterize her stool, because one bowel movement may contain a softly formed stool with loose or watery stool at the beginning and end of it, and fresh blood. I feel like it's time to move forward with treatment or diagnostics.
Originally I (think) I decided against biopsy because of its invasiveness/prep - don't want to put Vivian through that. I thought I would go straight to steroid if and when the time came. Now I have learned that the traveling radiologist (I live very rurally) with the ultrasound machine is coming to my vet's clinic this week for another animal so I could share the cost of his visit. In case someone says consult your vet, I have -
she says the gold standard for confirming IBD or cancer is biopsy but understands why I don't want to put the cat through that. She is very willing to go straight to steroid, but also recommends ultrasound before going to steroid to pick up any tumors that might be causing the bleeding. Originally she said she believed bleeding was from irritation from high frequency bowel movements. Now I don't think she's so sure about that, because she mentioned intestinal tumor. So I need to decide PDQ if I am going to go ahead with ultrasound. As you know, all of these procedures are expensive and like many of you I have spent a boat load of money in the past few months between Vivian's thyroid and then intestinal problems and my other cat's sinus problems. I don't want to do a test that won't change the treatment; on the other hand I don't want to miss an opportunity to get some information that will change the direction of treatment and benefit Vivian. In your experience, can ultrasound alone (without biopsy) detect a difference between IBD and a cancer and is it worth pursuing this instead of just initiating treatment with steroid?
thank you