It's too stupid for words, and obviously completely fake.Originally Posted by Carolina
I just think the video is dumb her voice is irritating... she sounds so stupid... can't believe it went viral
Don't think it is funny at all....
Originally Posted by Natalie_ca
It's too stupid for words, and obviously completely fake.
In my attempt to stop the video, I accidentally "liked" it!Originally Posted by Carolina
I tried being as nice as I could about it.....
Now THAT's the only thing funny about this "I Love Cats" video!!Originally Posted by Natalie_ca
In my attempt to stop the video, I accidentally "liked" it!Any idea how to unlike something there?!
It's very obviously fake because if you look in the sidebar at youtube you can see another video by her where she is "playing" twins by standing at the edge of a mirror making her reflection look like a twin.
People will do anything for 15 minutes of fame these days.
Originally Posted by GloriaJH
Now THAT's the only thing funny about this "I Love Cats" video!!
Fortunately I clicked on the correct button and actually STOPPED the video, whew!
I used to have one too. It's not cheap to join and I didn't feel that I was getting my money's worth.Originally Posted by Grogs
Maybe we should hook up.
Once upon a time, I had an eHarmony profile and the majority of my pictures had a cat in them somewhere - on my lap, in my arms, etc.
Originally Posted by Carolina
I just think the video is dumb her voice is irritating... she sounds so stupid... can't believe it went viral
Don't think it is funny at all....
This one for me is much better http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/clips/p0..._white_feline/
Hmm, I joined Match.com for fun when it was free for awhile and I was able to select the age range I was interested in (exact opposite of you - my philosophy is, unless he's five or more years older than me, he's too young! lol! my first serious boyfriend was 18 years older than me). I think Match also allows you to choose if you are looking for a man or woman no matter which gender you are, which eHarmony does NOT do, so maybe the traditional age assumption/restriction is part of that mindset as well.Originally Posted by Natalie_ca
Also, I really am not interested in dating an older man. I prefer guys my own age or a year or 2 older, or up to 10 years younger. The way eHarmony works is that they tell you what age you need to be matched with and they were matching me with guys up to 12 or 15 years older than I was.
I seem to remember being able to set the ages exactly. I think it did initially set it to a certain range, but I was able to change it. I had the same problem with the geographical settings. I set mine to 30 miles, and the profile settings were always bugging me and telling me I should set it to at least 180 miles. My thought was that I live in a metro area with ~ 400,000 people and if I couldn't find a match in that area, the service was a waste of time.Originally Posted by Natalie_ca
I used to have one too. It's not cheap to join and I didn't feel that I was getting my money's worth.
In my profile I specifically said that I love The City life. That I had no interest in relocating, especially to a small town or to the country.
Since I'm not interested in relocating and am not into the whole long distance, never see each other relationships, I had a narrow geographic scope. However, I wasn't getting any matches, so I widened the geographic area slightly.
After that I started to get matches. However, most were from North or South Dakota, Nebraska and Minnesota from guys living in remote country areas or on farms. I seriously doubt that a guy who owns a farm is going to want to sell it and move to Canada to live in the heart of a city of almost 800,000 people!!!
Also, I really am not interested in dating an older man. I prefer guys my own age or a year or 2 older, or up to 10 years younger. The way eHarmony works is that they tell you what age you need to be matched with and they were matching me with guys up to 12 or 15 years older than I was.