- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #41
I think you're in a tough spot, as it sounds like your breeder is blaming you for the kittens illness and isn't willing to budge from that stance. If your Vet is suspecting FIP, you'll have to shell out the money to get the proof positive tests done, before you can prove that the kitten acquired it while in the care of the breeder. If there is any chance he acquired it after you picked him up, you'll have a difficult time making a case in court.Originally Posted by darincm
We have a contract & their is a health gaurantee. As per the contract when we discovered he was sick we returned him to her. She returned him to us four days later assuring us that we was healthy - and he did appear very healthy.
It was 24 hours after that he took a turn for the worse again & he has been in & out of vets since.
The crux of the issue now is that they believe he was healthy when he left -
and did appear healthy. As pointed out earlier though, there are illnesses that do not present immediately & only appear with the onset of stress - ie a move to a new environment.
I'm not sure how any breeder could argue $1200 in vet bills - we didn't do this for fun
Im not very clear on exactly what the contract states. Does it say that if the cat is checked by a vet within a certain time frame and found to be sick, it could be returned and the money refunded or a kitten replacement would be provided? Why didn't the breeder refund the money or replace the kitten when you returned it just a few days later? When you took the kitten back to the breeder, did you agree to forgo the refund or the replacement? Did you agree that she could give you the same cat back if she could make it healthy?Originally Posted by darincm
We have a contract & their is a health gaurantee. As per the contract when we discovered he was sick we returned him to her. She returned him to us four days later assuring us that we was healthy - and he did appear very healthy.
It was 24 hours after that he took a turn for the worse again & he has been in & out of vets since.
The crux of the issue now is that they believe he was healthy when he left -
and did appear healthy. As pointed out earlier though, there are illnesses that do not present immediately & only appear with the onset of stress - ie a move to a new environment.
I'm not sure how any breeder could argue $1200 in vet bills - we didn't do this for fun
I was wondering the same thing. Of course, that won't cause a URI but the other symptoms do sound like what you suggested.Originally Posted by DragonLady
I am wondering if you have house plants he is munching or if you are using Pine Sol or other cleaners that have proven to cause illness in kitties. Some kitties are more sensitive to chemicals than others so that is why only one is ill.
Just my 2 cents worth
Teresa
While I can understand your frustration, I personally wouldn't want this sort of association involved. The reason why is because the only way to force breeders to comply with the decisions and register with the association would be if the government were running it. I really think the government is involved enough in our day to day lives already.Originally Posted by darincm
That's why there needs to be an independant association that consists of breeders, vets & consumers who can mediate these types of issues instead of people resorting to the courts.
Actually, if the breeder would have taken the kitten back the FIRST time, you would not be in this situation. Personally, I would have said NO to getting the kitten back after taking it back the first time. You should have gotten a replacement kitten the first time you took the kitten back. Apparently, this was not the case and there was some other agreement between you and the breeder later. Obviouly the lesson here for ALL of us is to stick with the contract terms. Once you go outside of those terms - it's her word against yours. You see it one way, she sees it a different way. All you have behind you is your signed agreement and since that agreement was not followed, now technically your guarantee period is gone. The right thing to do is to give you another kitten, but unfortunately legally you may not have a leg to stand on any longer.Originally Posted by darincm
If the breeder would have taken him back the second time he got ill we would not be in this situation
I
If it is indeed a liver shunt, the call will be up to you. I can only tell you what I know with my experience. Firstly, check your contract if your baby was guarenteed against genetic defect, they have to replace or refund. A liver shunt IS a genetic defect.Originally Posted by Mastercolorist
HI this is Darins wife, we had Izzy to the vet again today, they think he has a liver shunt, Tests will be done tomorrow, we should get the results by wed.The breeder has continued to deny that she has sold us a ill kitten, she said if test s proved othervise she will get back to us.But they want us to go but Izzy down and wait for a replacement to be born.we are now very much attached to my little man i call him! he s lovable funny, and too cute! Do we give him a chance to see if he responds to treatment ? or also trust the breeder to give us another HEALTHY kitten! All advise is welcome Thanks again! Sandra and Darin Ps Izzy and Ella too!