As I have said in the past, I am, for the most part, anti-declaw.Originally Posted by urbantigers
If a kitty is attacking people and behaviour modification hasn't worked then maybe the cat should be put to sleep. Although it seems a drastic solution (and I'm not advocating putting cats to sleep for behaviour problems right left and centre) I don't think that declawing - or any other procedure that's generally unacceptable - can be defended by saying it's better than being put to sleep. From a cat's point of view, being put painlessly to sleep is probably better than undergoing a painful operation and being unable to indulge in part of it's natural behaviour forever afterwards.
Our 4 that have been declawed came to us that way.
But I do have to respectfully disagree with you here.
I had my first cat declawed, and I was fully educated on the procedure.
His was done out of necessity, and it was still a very, very difficult decision to make.
He was born microcephalic and clinically diagnosed as mentally disabled.
This was a wonderful, healthy boy, with one exception, he was basically a time bomb that only a few people could read, and not 100% of the time.
This was a cat that had extremely violent moodswings and would attack whatever was in reach.
I worked very closely with his vet and we tried everything from behavior modification, to drug therapy, this was a dangerous animal, through no fault of his own.
We finally decided on the declaw as the moodswings could not be curbed.
He never developed any biting behaviors, and he stayed violent, but he was much more easily handled by the vet and his staff, who formerly wore falconer's gloves just to vaccinate him.
I had 13 beautiful years with him, and if I had it all to do over again, I would, his was the most rewarding friendship I have ever shared with any animal.