*smile* After caring for Siamese cats for nearly all of my going-on 47 years and now actively participating in an Old-Style Siamese Breed Preservation program, I have learned more than just a small bit about what genetic issues the breed is predisposed to -- chronic gingivitis and stomatitis are among those issues. But, no, I am not a DVM nor am I a vet tech.Originally Posted by Feline_friend
Gayef, you sound knowledgeable about this matter. Are you a DVM or vet tech? I'm just wondering where you came by this information.
Then we would be "kindred souls" in our distrust. I don't believe that ~all~ medical and/or veterinary health care professionals are in it to make money and only to make money either. But again, I do have first-hand, personal experience with a couple who are indeed that way. And then of course, since it is currently "politically incorrect" to support breeding efforts, it is doubly hard for me to find a vet willing to work with 1) a breeder and 2) someone usually not willing to take what they say to me as gospel. I am a researcher, first and foremost. I am of the firm opinion that knowledge is amunition when fighting disease, any disease. The more we know about it, how it works, what feeds it, what it's weaknesses and strengths are -- the better armed we are to fight it or even prevent it completely.I don't mean to be temerarious, it's just that I distrust doctors. It's not that I think all DVMs are just out to make a buck and only make a buck. But I do believe they are subject to self-deception like everyone else, especially where it might lead to higher income.
The currently-accepted vaccine protocol is something I have been struggling with for a while now. However, the problem I have had is that unless you are willing to be on board with their protocol, a lot of vets will not treat your animals. My case in point ... my female, Lexus began her vaccines for Rhinotraceitis, Calici Virus and Panelukopenia at her breeder's home when she was 6 weeks old. She received the second shot in that series, again, at her breeder's home at 9 weeks. I received a document from her breeder with the dates, the dosages, the manufacturer, the lot identification numbers and a notarized affirmation from the breeder's vet that the breeder was competant in the administration of sub-q vaccines in kittens. A certified copy of this document went to my vet along with Lexus on her first vet visit upon coming to live with me. He refused to accept it and demanded that I immediately begin the protocol again, which would, of course, result in Lexus receiving a full TWO extra and IMO, totally unnecessary vaccines! Needless to say, Lex went immediately back into my carrier and we promptly left, never to return.Case in point: the very common practice of over vaccination. I believe this is simply a "cash-cow" for veterinarians ...
Let us not forget that vaccines have also been linked to the onset of cancerous tumors at the injection site. However, more study on this is needed because as they are continuing to unravel the mysteries of feline genetics, we have learned that cats can carry an abnormality on certain a certain locus. Injecting the cats carrying this abnormal onco-gene, even with nothing more than sterile saline has caused a tumor to appear.... and most if not all instances of "booster" vaccinations (those following the cat's first vaccine) are not going to increase the cat's longevity, but decrease it. As you may know, vaccinations have been linked to immunological problems.
While I have a deep respect for Dr. Pitcairn, I find that a lot of this approach falls short when placed in the hands of novices in a home environment.More info may be found on the web, or in Dr. Pitcairn's Complete Guide to Natural Health for Dogs and Cats.