General Motors & Microsoft

debby

TCS Member
Thread starter
Veteran
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Messages
10,983
Purraise
4
Location
Iowa
Got this in an e-mail, and thought it was funny.



At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of your car windows, shut it off, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car unless you bought "CarNT," but then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would only run on five percent of the roads.

7. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "General Fault" warning light.

8. New seats would force everyone to have the same sized butt.

9. The airbag system would ask "are you SURE?" before deploying.

10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50% or more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the Justice Dept.

12. Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. AND...You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
 

cooie

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Jan 31, 2002
Messages
301
Purraise
1
Location
D/FW Texas
That's pretty old, but I still chuckle every time I see it! Because it is so TRUE! Way to go, GM (although I certainly am not defending THEIR business practices, either!).
 

valanhb

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
32,530
Purraise
100
Location
Lakewood (Denver suburb), Colorado
As much as I am forced to use MS products, I absolutely hate their products! No other company could possibly put out such sub-standard products and try to "fix" them later!


I always laugh at this one! It is so true!
 

katl8e

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
12,622
Purraise
3
Location
Movin' on up!
I'm a first-time computer owner and I'm happy with Windows Xp. Of course, I have no basis for comparison but I've learned a lot, on my own, with this system. As for GM, my 19-year-old Oldsmobile is running beautifully.
 
Top