TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Heidi Fliess opening up MALE brothal
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Heidi Fliess opening up MALE brothal

post #1 of 31
1/15/06 at 4:53pm
Thread Starter 
I just read in my local newspaper that Heidi Fliess is going to open up a STUD FARM is Crystal, Nevada.

http://stories.indobase.com/article_674.shtml

I know female brothals are legal in Nevada but what is your opinion. Would you go if you had the chance? The cost starts at $250/hr.
Reply
post #2 of 31
1/15/06 at 4:57pm
At least she's going legal this time.

I wouldn't go now that I'm married. She will probably still cater to the very rich so I would probably never be able to afford it regardless.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. There will probably be enough money and business to keep Heidi in a very comfortable lifestyle.
Reply
post #3 of 31
1/15/06 at 4:59pm
I am of the opinion that men and women are hard wired differently when it comes to sex. If this business was going to be such an all-fire success, don't you think it would be as common as traditional prostitution? Heidi's not thinking up anything new.
Reply
post #4 of 31
1/15/06 at 5:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb25
I am of the opinion that men and women are hard wired differently when it comes to sex. If this business was going to be such an all-fire success, don't you think it would be as common as traditional prostitution? Heidi's not thinking up anything new.
I suspect you're right, Deb.
Reply
post #5 of 31
1/15/06 at 5:13pm
Most of the women who pay for male escorts are not hiring them primarily for sex. A male escort has to be well-dressed, well-groomed, well-mannered and be able to carry on an intelligent conversation.

Heidi's "stud farm" isn't going to draw the kind of clientele that she wants. She may get a few curiosity-seekers.

One wonders how many clients these men are going to be able to "service" per day. Considering male physiology and the "recovery time" needed, I don't see how a man could do the volume business necessary to make a living.
Reply
post #6 of 31
1/15/06 at 6:03pm
Not interested. I would be concerned about STD's among other infections that could result from contact with a prostitute. I imagine even if they are using condoms and having "clean" relations, they are still at risk, and I am not interested in taking any chances. Besides, the fact that they are hookers would make me want to hurl. And the fact is, she is still going to draw a lot of men to her farm, despite the "fact" that she's aiming at women this time around.
Reply
post #7 of 31
1/15/06 at 6:08pm
Personally not my cup of tea but intresting small talk
Reply
post #8 of 31
1/15/06 at 7:12pm
A stud farm! That is pretty funny. I wouldn't go, but I'll bet she is successful in this venture. Think about how popular the "thunder from down under" is.
Reply
post #9 of 31
1/15/06 at 8:36pm
Ew, no way. I don't even like male strippers!
Reply
post #10 of 31
1/16/06 at 7:01am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb25
I am of the opinion that men and women are hard wired differently when it comes to sex. If this business was going to be such an all-fire success, don't you think it would be as common as traditional prostitution? Heidi's not thinking up anything new.
I also agree that men and women are TOTALLY different when it comes to sex. Men have definitley made female prostitution and porn a HUGE industry, not women... not that women don't participate in some of the same things, but certainly not to the extent men do. Our makeup is just different.
Reply
post #11 of 31
1/16/06 at 7:24am
I have to disagree to some extent with the majority of posters here. Kinsey pretty conclusively found, to the astonishment of 1940s society, that women have as much of a sexual drive as men. IMO the difference is that today's society STILL convinces women that their sex drive is dirty while a man's is natural. (i.e. the still held notion that a man with many partners is a stud, while a woman is a slut) What is wired differently is that many women do equate sex with love, but not all. There have to be more women than just me who can distinguish between the two, and separate them.
Reply
post #12 of 31
1/16/06 at 8:10am
Just so everyone knows, while prostitution is legal in SOME counties in Nevada it is NOT legal in Clark County. Las Vegas is in Clark County.


P.S. I thought I heard somewhere that the Kinsey research and findings were largely debunked.

I do not think Heidi's new endeavor will fly, but I have been wrong before.

And regarding the legal Nevada brothels and STD's. Don't kid yourself, they are so closely monitored you wouldn't believe it. It is much safer to go to a legal brothel in Nevada then to have sex with your BF or a one-night stand, when it comes to STD's.
The girls are test monthly I believe.
Reply
post #13 of 31
1/16/06 at 8:23am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv
P.S. I thought I heard somewhere that the Kinsey research and findings were largely debunked.
There were parts that were debunked, but by and large the research has been upheld. The criticism was largely, and is still largely, by groups who don't like what the study showed (i.e. that homosexuality isn't a miniscule portion of society, and that women are in fact sexual beings). The criticism was largely about the sampling procedure used, and how much Kinsey's samples represented a true sampling of Americans which was later addressed by one of Kinsey's colleagues:

Quote:
In a response to these criticisms, Paul Gebhard, Kinsey's successor as director of the Kinsey Institute for Sex Research, spent years "cleaning" the Kinsey data of its purported contaminants, removing, for example, all material derived from prison populations in the basic sample. In 1979, Gebhard (with Alan B. Johnson) published The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research. Their conclusion, to Gebhard's surprise he claimed, was that none of Kinsey's original estimates were significantly affected by this bias.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_report
Reply
post #14 of 31
1/16/06 at 10:43am
Why should highly unchoosy men be the only ones that have that choice?

On a side note, I wouldn't go. I don't even do one night stands. I'm a have-to-know-and-love-you-first-and-even-then-one-at-a-time kind of woman. Granted, sex is sex, but the way I see it, accidents can happen, and I would feel better knowing that the (though accidental) dad was someone worth having a child with, and not a crazy "it ain't mine" talkshow dad.
Reply
post #15 of 31
1/16/06 at 10:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonOddity042

On a side note, I wouldn't go. I don't even do one night stands. I'm a have-to-know-and-love-you-first-and-even-then-one-at-a-time kind of woman. LOL

I agree. As a woman, I can get instant action when I walk out the door.
Why would I want to pay for it?
And I have never gotten anything out of the one-time thing. Its boring.

But, I don't judge anyone that sells their goods. To each his own.
Reply
post #16 of 31
1/16/06 at 10:55am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv
Just so everyone knows, while prostitution is legal in SOME counties in Nevada it is NOT legal in Clark County. Las Vegas is in Clark County.


P.S. I thought I heard somewhere that the Kinsey research and findings were largely debunked.

I do not think Heidi's new endeavor will fly, but I have been wrong before.

And regarding the legal Nevada brothels and STD's. Don't kid yourself, they are so closely monitored you wouldn't believe it. It is much safer to go to a legal brothel in Nevada then to have sex with your BF or a one-night stand, when it comes to STD's.
The girls are test monthly I believe.
Something interesting is that Prostitution is legal and regulated in Counties under 400,000 people? I found this kind of odd and humorous? Not enough to do they figure in smaller communities??

I am all for legalized prosititution. It keeps the sex trade workers safer and healthier. And they do test for STD's WEEKLY and HIV monthly.
That is much more than the average person.

And all workers are required to use condoms at all times. This is a girl/guy's living. She is less likely to be risky in that sense (especially in a regulated legal brothel) due to that.
Reply
post #17 of 31
1/16/06 at 1:08pm
None of the options suited, so I didn't vote. I wouldn't go, but not because it's gross, but because it's objectifying (spelling?) men.
Reply
post #18 of 31
1/16/06 at 4:13pm
because of the way men are built I would be more than likely paying him for his pleasure!

Not meaning to be graphic but the 'studs' would have to be highly skilled to make it worth any womans while.
Reply
post #19 of 31
1/16/06 at 9:42pm
But maybe this is going to be more of an "experience" for lonely women. Maybe she'll have these men who will spend an entire evening catering to ONE woman....giving them their fantasies and fulfilling wishes?

*shrugs*
Reply
post #20 of 31
1/16/06 at 9:44pm
*pondering*
Wonder if any of those men will look and talk and smile like Russell Crowe....
Reply
post #21 of 31
1/17/06 at 5:49am
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffysimba
But maybe this is going to be more of an "experience" for lonely women. Maybe she'll have these men who will spend an entire evening catering to ONE woman....giving them their fantasies and fulfilling wishes?

*shrugs*
MY fantasy would be to have THREE men - one to cook, one to clean and one to rub my feet.
Reply
post #22 of 31
1/17/06 at 6:16am
I think i'll just save my money and use it to get a regular guy really drunk instead
Reply
post #23 of 31
1/17/06 at 9:24am
haha... I love it.... Most likly would never go, but still I like the idea...
Reply
post #24 of 31
1/17/06 at 4:16pm
Lets try to round up the TCS resedent males and see what they think of this! :p
Reply
post #25 of 31
1/17/06 at 5:16pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by katl8e
MY fantasy would be to have THREE men - one to cook, one to clean and one to rub my feet.
LOL Good one!!! I think I like your fantasy...One has to look like Russell Crowe, One Sean Connery when he was younger and One to look like ...uh...Tom Selleck!
Meeeooooow!
Reply
post #26 of 31
1/17/06 at 11:14pm
That's just wrong on so many levels
Reply
post #27 of 31
1/19/06 at 12:13pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryn
None of the options suited, so I didn't vote. I wouldn't go, but not because it's gross, but because it's objectifying (spelling?) men.
Ok I respect the fact you would never go, but you're comment of it "objectifying men" I find very interesting. What do you think of strip clubs and other such "gentlemen's clubs". Do you feel the same way about them?
Reply
post #28 of 31
1/21/06 at 2:20am
Quote:
Originally Posted by eburgess
Ok I respect the fact you would never go, but you're comment of it "objectifying men" I find very interesting. What do you think of strip clubs and other such "gentlemen's clubs". Do you feel the same way about them?
Well, yes, I do

However: I don't mind if someone, male or female, wants to make him/herself available as an object and someone wants to view them as such. I don't think there's anything morally wrong about that. I just don't want to be neither the object or the objectifyer myself, just not my cup of tea.

Anyone besides me wishing to go to a male or a female brothel, feel free to do so, as long as the employees aren't exploited.
Reply
post #29 of 31
1/22/06 at 3:00pm
I think that if they can have it for men, then it is fair to have one for women.

Having said that, I would never go. Not my cup of tea.
Reply
post #30 of 31
1/23/06 at 8:44am
Well, its no different than women being prostitutes, but FOR ME, sex is all about love, so I have no use for it. OOps, better edit that. I didn't mean I don't have a use for SEX . I jsut don't have a use for a brothel.

Ryn, I LOVE your siggy!
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Heidi Fliess opening up MALE brothal