- Joined
- Aug 30, 2005
- Messages
- 209
- Purraise
- 0
I recently adopted two kittens. One was the cat I really wanted, and the second, a solid black, was given to me as a companion. (They're both excellent cats and I love them both regardless). The one I wanted, Alcott, I was told is a purebred Bengal. I'm in GA, where Bengals are illegal, but the story I got was that he was bred by someone out of state, the 1st owner moved and had too many expenses, he was sold to the woman I got him from who happens to run a cat adoption agency. The woman I got him from then went through a nasty divorce and a series of other unfortunate events, and so they put him up through adoption at the agency, which is where I found him.
I love Alcott regardless of his breed, but as he ages I question if he's really a purebred bengal. When he was born he had light but still defined spots, and as he ages he is losing them. I know bengals go through a period of losing/fading spots, but at almost 18 weeks I thought it'd be over. I've also heard that his particular type- seal lynxpoint-- often take about a year to fully develop their coat.
Pictures:
At about 9-12 weeks:
Present:
The stripes on his legs have darkened slightly since I've gotten him, and there are faint spots on his stomach that I'm not certain were there when I first got him. Also, the camera I use is VERY poor quality. His back is not solid white, but more of a cream color that is somewhat inconsistent across his back. The stripes on his legs are also slightly darker- more coffee colored.
What do you think? Is he purebred after all? I know the foster mom I got him from paid 450 dollars to get him from the first owner (they knew each other somehow) so I don't think any of the owners got lied to (I can't imagine an adoption agency lying about his breed, especially judging on the people I met there), so I wonder if the breeder swindled them, or if he *is* purebred, just not an excellent example of the breed.
I love Alcott regardless of his breed, but as he ages I question if he's really a purebred bengal. When he was born he had light but still defined spots, and as he ages he is losing them. I know bengals go through a period of losing/fading spots, but at almost 18 weeks I thought it'd be over. I've also heard that his particular type- seal lynxpoint-- often take about a year to fully develop their coat.
Pictures:
At about 9-12 weeks:
Present:
The stripes on his legs have darkened slightly since I've gotten him, and there are faint spots on his stomach that I'm not certain were there when I first got him. Also, the camera I use is VERY poor quality. His back is not solid white, but more of a cream color that is somewhat inconsistent across his back. The stripes on his legs are also slightly darker- more coffee colored.
What do you think? Is he purebred after all? I know the foster mom I got him from paid 450 dollars to get him from the first owner (they knew each other somehow) so I don't think any of the owners got lied to (I can't imagine an adoption agency lying about his breed, especially judging on the people I met there), so I wonder if the breeder swindled them, or if he *is* purebred, just not an excellent example of the breed.