TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › PETA stepped over the line
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

PETA stepped over the line

post #1 of 35
Thread Starter 
I've always supported and defended PETA because after all they do help animals. Or so I though!

I just saw in another forum that two PETA employees were arrested and charged with animal cruelty. They were caught dumping bags containing 18 dogs including 1 bag containing several puppies and additional bags containing 13 dead dogs were found inside their van.

They picked up the dogs at Vets offices and I think a shelter in North Carolina saying they were going to bring them back to Norfolk to find homes for them.

The police said that this was the 4th time they found dead dogs in that dump
ster. So this has been going on for awhile. One lady in the forum who lives in the area said they also found dead cats and kittens in the bags. She said 1 cat and 1 kitten were found to be still alive.

I don't know how to cut and paste to get the article here but it was in the Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald.
post #2 of 35
PETA have always been stepping over the line in my book!
post #3 of 35
post #4 of 35
It also made the Associated Press and the Times Telegram-
post #5 of 35
This is very upsetting.
post #6 of 35
I wonder what lame excuse they would come up with and I also wonder what the autopsies will find.
post #7 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydroaxe
I wonder what lame excuse they would come up with and I also wonder what the autopsies will find.
THe dogs and cats were euthanized.
The vet says Peta employees promised to find these animals good homes. Instead they apparently took the animals, killed them and dumped their bodies into a public dumpster.
post #8 of 35
I take back every nice thing I ever said about PETA. This is just horrible.
post #9 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellie
I've always supported and defended PETA because after all they do help animals. Or so I though!
...
Most people do.

Too few understand what this org is really all about, they have a great propoganda machine going and most of their supporters, truely believe that PETA does good things for animals.

Let me be absolutely blunt, PETA has done very little good things for animals over the many years of their existance.

I know you meant well with PETA, and I know most supporters do mean well, but PETA is not an org worth supporting. In a nutshell, their definition of "Ethical" involves the concept "Extinction over Exploitation", and their definition of "Exploitation" is any use of an animal, other than observing in their natural habitat from a non-intrusive distance. In fact the core leadership of PETA, has an ultimate goal to essentially all out eliminate the existance of captive animals [Including Dogs/Cats/etc].

They do their best to keep this truth concealed, but their actions, and their blatent lack of willingness to deny this statment in numerous interviews, pretty much confirms it.

There are good orgs out there that do stand up for the Humane treatment of animals, most of them are independent shelters/rescue orgs, there aren't many national orgs, but there are plenty of groups to be found.

Besides PETA, there are some other groups worth steering away from...HSUS, IFAW to name but two national orgs. IFAW is a grey matter, because they do just as much good as they do harm. However HSUS and PETA have done virtually no good over the course of their existance.

Spotz
post #10 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by esrgirl
I take back every nice thing I ever said about PETA. This is just horrible.
I never liked them. And it seems the only thing the organization itself is even upset about is that the bodies were dumped into a public dumpster. Not that these animals were removed from vets and shelters, because peta employees promised to find them good homes, and then killed. They suspended one lady that was caught, and left the guy still working for them! And even the lady was suspended not because she collected the animals and killed them, but because she dumped the bodies into a dumpster.
In fact, Peta apparently thinks euthanazia (and we are talking about animals that are healthy) is a humane thing to do. Yes, I beleive their ultimate goal is to forbid all pet ownership.
post #11 of 35
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spotz
Most people do.

Too few understand what this org is really all about, they have a great propoganda machine going and most of their supporters, truely believe that PETA does good things for animals.

Let me be absolutely blunt, PETA has done very little good things for animals over the many years of their existance.

I know you meant well with PETA, and I know most supporters do mean well, but PETA is not an org worth supporting. In a nutshell, their definition of "Ethical" involves the concept "Extinction over Exploitation", and their definition of "Exploitation" is any use of an animal, other than observing in their natural habitat from a non-intrusive distance. In fact the core leadership of PETA, has an ultimate goal to essentially all out eliminate the existance of captive animals [Including Dogs/Cats/etc].

They do their best to keep this truth concealed, but their actions, and their blatent lack of willingness to deny this statment in numerous interviews, pretty much confirms it.

There are good orgs out there that do stand up for the Humane treatment of animals, most of them are independent shelters/rescue orgs, there aren't many national orgs, but there are plenty of groups to be found.

Besides PETA, there are some other groups worth steering away from...HSUS, IFAW to name but two national orgs. IFAW is a grey matter, because they do just as much good as they do harm. However HSUS and PETA have done virtually no good over the course of their existance.

Spotz
Thanks for the information. I guess I kinda connected to PETA because I don't believe in slaughtering animals for food or for fur. I've never been a fan of the Humane Society but I understand that there are some good ones around. I don't know who the IFAW is but I'll check them out.
post #12 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellie
Thanks for the information. I guess I kinda connected to PETA because I don't believe in slaughtering animals for food or for fur. I've never been a fan of the Humane Society but I understand that there are some good ones around. I don't know who the IFAW is but I'll check them out.
You're welcome.

heres a link www.ifaw.org

Like I said they do a lot of decent things...but just as much bad things. PETA/HSUS are definately worse.

There's gotta be a better, more reputable, org working towards the Animals for Food issue than PETA though. Surely there are groups out there that would promote the truth about a Vegan lifestyle, in a manner that is open and respectful.

Spotz
post #13 of 35
All I know is that I am happy that the truth about PETA has finally been brought into the media spotlight. The thought of them taking those puppies and kittens and killing them, without even trying to place them into new homes, just makes me sick.
post #14 of 35
I have never heard anything negative towards HSUS...what is it?(meaning what bad to they do?)
post #15 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by elizwithcat
THe dogs and cats were euthanized.
The vet says Peta employees promised to find these animals good homes. Instead they apparently took the animals, killed them and dumped their bodies into a public dumpster.
That is totally insane.. How, why GRRRRRR dangit how can stuff like this happen.. I don't know what to say it just BOILS MY BLOOD..
post #16 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScamperFarms
I have never heard anything negative towards HSUS...what is it?(meaning what bad to they do?)
HSUS stands for [Humane Society of the United States]...it is an org that, while named well [PETA has a great sounding name too...coincidence?], has very little connection to most local Humane Societies.

What HSUS does is push for stricter and stricter laws on pet ownership. Often pushing bans of exotics, and pushing for legal limits on the number of animals a person can own. Most of the funds they collect go towards legislation and supporting other similarly focused orgs...PETA/IFAW/etc...very little of the donated money goes to funding the actual Humane treatment of animals.

In fact, if I recall correctly, to date, HSUS and PETA have both never once supported or run an animal shelter/rescue. Instead of actually making a difference in life, they prefer to stick to making a difference on paper.

Interesting factoid...HSUS has over 70 employees with a salary of over 50,000....with more than 5 employees that make greater than $100,000 per year. This is a non-profit org, that on paper exists for the betterment of animals, yet their operational history, and the compensation level of some of their employees, does make one wonder what exactly they are doing.

Also, even a cursory glance at their website demonstrates the similarities of HSUS to PETA. Check it out:

www.hsus.org
www.peta.org

HSUS does not do any good, I've yet to see any proof that PETA has ever done anything good...and we've all recently seen proof that PETA is no good.

Spotz

PS...HSUS reported an income of approx 72 million dollars in 2003, during this same year they spent 62 million of this income Lobbying government officials for changes. One would think that they'd be spending most of their money making a real difference for animals in need...not Lobbying.
post #17 of 35
PS...HSUS reported an income of approx 72 million dollars in 2003, during this same year they spent 62 million of this income Lobbying government officials for changes. One would think that they'd be spending most of their money making a real difference for animals in need...not Lobbying.
Yes, they spend a good deal of their money, that concerned animal lovers send them, to lobby government to take away our rights Thanks for posting this info Spotz. It's good to expose these crooks for who they are!! I am sick and tired of these people trying to convince government to tell me what animal I can or CAN NOT own. It's time for us to strike back and tell government to take away their tax exempt status and put an end to these orgs once and for all.
post #18 of 35
Not to get off topic too much, but lobbying for stricter penalties on those who fight animals (dogs, roosters), banning certain hunts (morning doves? Why do they need to be hunted?) is not a bad thing in my mind.

I'm not prepared to get into a huge arguement about this, and I do not support PETA, who is what this thread was originally about.
post #19 of 35
They do not lobby for penalties, they lobby for a complete BAN on animal ownership. At the moment, they work at banning private onwership of exotic cats/animals. This is wrong and I will not get into that here. There is a thread on exotic cat ownership in place already. But, your rights on domestic animal ownership is also being affected and if these orgs get their way, all ownership of ANY animal will be banned. Mark my words!! There are laws already in place in this coutry on dog fiting. I have no problems with them spending their money on animal WELFARE, but I do not want them wasting it on taking away my rights on animal onwership. I love my exotic cats as do other exotic animal owners. No one should tell me what animal I can or can not own as longs as, you do it responsibly, the health and welfare of the animal is provided for, for it's entire life and for the safety and protection of the public.(It goes without saying, that you can not safely care for a tiger in a small apartment and the animal will suffer as well. But private tiger ownership can be accomplished when done right) Being responsible goes for domestic animal ownership as well. I better shut up, I can go on and on
post #20 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by eatrawfish
Not to get off topic too much, but lobbying for stricter penalties on those who fight animals (dogs, roosters), banning certain hunts (morning doves? Why do they need to be hunted?) is not a bad thing in my mind.

I'm not prepared to get into a huge arguement about this, and I do not support PETA, who is what this thread was originally about.
Well, yes, Lobbying for stricter penalties on such acts would be a great. But lobbying against such acts occupy a very small % of what HSUS pushes [if they do it at all?]

The majority of the time, they are Lobbying for Strict or Total bans on owning certain animals...and every victory, they add more animals to their list. They also heavily lobby for population limits. Generally something like 2 dogs or 3 cats, per residence maximum. That would mean that virtually everyone here on TCS would not be allowed to have more than 3 cats at any time. They lobby for banning of breeding of these animals, heavily pushing towards mandatory S/N for all pets. Sounds good, until you realize that this is legislated extinction. They lobby against Zoos and Circuses and many other animal related organizations, because it is their belief [much like PETAs] that most of these orgs merely exploit animals.

The bulk of their Lobbying is for changes that can not be seen as anything but negative in the eyes of responsible pet owners.

So, again, while they may appear good at a glance, it's just a disguise. HSUS and PETA alike are not concerned at all with Animal Welfare, they focus rather on Animal Rights in their actions and their lobbying. HSUS focuses on going directly to the government, whereas PETA focuses more on going to the masses [grassroots]. HSUS tends to work behind the scenes, while PETA is well known for their extreme demonstrations. Both orgs share a common goal, both orgs actually compliment each other in the way they work. Both orgs are the enemy of animal owners across the nation, especially all the Responsible owners. But more importantly, they are the enemy of the well being of all the animals in this country.

The recent PETA debauchry is just one example. PETA's response? 'Yeah, we do stuff like that all the time, but we don't usually dump the bodies in a dumpster.'

They get caught, and the only thing they can really say in their defense...is that the person wasn't supposed to dump the bodies in a dumpster??? How many other places is this happening...how many animals has PETA alone killed this year? How many animals will they kill next year, how many animals will HSUS kill? IMO, 1 animal is too many, especially when the animals were killed just to make a political statement. ::censor::censor::censor::

Spotz
post #21 of 35
Thread Starter 
<<<<The recent PETA debauchry is just one example. PETA's response? 'Yeah, we do stuff like that all the time, but we don't usually dump the bodies in a dumpster.'

They get caught, and the only thing they can really say in their defense...is that the person wasn't supposed to dump the bodies in a dumpster??? How many other places is this happening...how many animals has PETA alone killed this year? How many animals will they kill next year, how many animals will HSUS kill? IMO, 1 animal is too many, especially when the animals were killed just to make a political statement. >>>>

Hi Spotz,

I found this site but I don't know how valid it is:

http://www.petakillsanimals.com

I think we should all meet at Norfolk and let PETA know what we think of them.

Ellen
post #22 of 35
Something needs to be done.

Spotz
post #23 of 35
1. Vets, shelters, and AC groups are alleging that they were told by PeTA representatives that the animals surrendered to PeTA would be placed in good homes in VA. Clearly, this is gross misrepresentation at best, and probabaly qualifies as fraud.
Not to mention the fact that according to reports, PeTA has a euthanasia rate in the high 70% range.
Not exaclty what I would call "aggressive" in animal adoptions.

2. Newkirk acknowledges that they had "agreements" with shelters in NC to pick up and euthanize animals.
Okay, fine, but which shelters were these?
Clearly, some of the NC facilities involved had been led to believe otherwise. The question here is "By whom?" Contact had to have been made by solicitation from PETA. Were there contracts?
If so, what did these contracts stipulate would or was supposed to happen?

3. Hinkle and Cook wouldn't have been given a van and medications so that they could just go joyriding through NC. They would have to account for their time AND the medications, especially since they would have been in possesion of class II narcotics.
Since it is reasonable to assume that they returned the van without animals and with a smaller amount of medication.
It is also reasonable to assume that someone would want to know where they had been and what happened to the missing medication.
Possible Drug Enforcement Administration involvement?
We can only hope.

4. Medications would not have been provided to Hinkle and Cook unless their PURPOSE was "offing" the poor critters that they picked up. This isn't exactly consistent with "transporting them to VA for euthinazation" as
Newkirk alleges. Clearly, by providing Hinkle and Cook with the medication, there was no intent that the animals would ever make it to VA.
WHO PROVIDED THEM WITH THE MEDICATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS?

5. Didn't anyone at PeTA wonder where the deceased animals were since Hinkle would have had to come back with either:
A)Dead Animals
or B all the medication she left with.

There are far more important fish to fry here than Cook and "Mother Teresa" Hinkle. This matter goes way up the PETA food chain.
Nothing like this happens at PeTA without Ingrid Newkirks knowledge or approval....
Nothing.

If you would like to give PeTA a taste of their own medicine, these companies support PeTA by providing free advertising for their campaigns.

Billboard companies

Lamar Outdoor Advertising in Victoria, TX
Lamar Outdoor Advertising in Scranton, PA
Lamar Outdoor Advertising in Pensacola, FL
Lamar Outdoor Advertising in San Benito, TX
Lamar Outdoor Advertising in Corpus Christi, TX
Clear Channel Houston, TX
Mid Port Advertising Middletown, NY
Mosley Outdoor Advertising Ft. Pierce, FL
Adams Outdoor in Peoria, Illinois
Bench Billboards in Cincinnati, Ohio
Fairway Outdoor in Raleigh, North Carolina
Hart Advertising in Norwalk, Ohio
InterState Outdoor in Selma, North Carolina
Lamar Outdoor in Texarkana, Arkansas
Lamar Outdoor Advertising in Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Lamar Outdoor Advertising in Bridgeport, West Virginia
Morgan Signs in Altoona, Pennsylvania
Sarmiento Advertising Group in Miami, Florida

Publications

Good Housekeeping
Ladies’ Home Journal
Vivid
Impact Press
Urb
Catalina
Curve
Hollywood Life
Ocean Drive
O, The Oprah Magazine
Seventeen

If you would like to write to Ingrid Newkirk, her e.mail address is:
IngridNewKirk@peta.org taken from her own website, www.IngridNewkirk.com

Educate yourself about who PeTA is in cahoots with
http://www.activistcash.com/organiza...iew.cfm/oid/21

You should also look at where PeTA is getting their money from, which celebrities are supporting them and perhaps more frightining, look at who PeTA is in bed with in their "Key Players" section.

From the website:
In the past, PETA has handled the press for the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a violent, underground group of fanatics who plant firebombs in restaurants, destroy butcher shops, and torch research labs. The FBI considers ALF among America's most active and prolific terrorist groups, but PETA compares it to the Underground Railroad and the French Resistance. More than 20 years after its inception, PETA continues to hire convicted ALF militants and funds their legal defense. In at least one case, court records show that Ingrid Newkirk herself was involved in an ALF arson.

PETA has even begun to adopt the tactics of an ALF offshoot known as SHAC (Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty). This group is notorious for taking protests outside the boardroom and into the living room, attacking their targets at their homes.


These people are DANGEROUS and MUST BE STOPPED!!!!!!!!!
post #24 of 35
Thanks for the additional information.
post #25 of 35
Here is some info from an exotic animal discussion group I belong to:

Here are some quotes in their own words, this is why we truly believe that Peta did know what their members were doing - murdering:


The cat, like the dog, must disappear... We should cut the domestic cat

free from our dominance by neutering, neutering and more neutering, until

our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist."

--John Bryant, *Fettered Kingdoms* (PeTA, 1982) p15



"Let us allow the dog to disappear from our brick and concrete jungles--

from our firesides, from the leather nooses and chains by which we enslave

it."-- John Bryant Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of a Changing Ethic, p15





"The bottom line is that people don't have the right to manipulate or to

breed dogs and cats ... If people want toys they should buy inanimate

objects. If they want companionship they should seek it with their own

kind."--INGRID NEWKIRK, FOUNDER, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT

OF ANIMALS (PETA)



"In the end, I think it would be lovely if we stopped this whole notion of

pets altogether." (INGRID NEWKIRK-Newsday, Feb. 21, 1988)



"As the surplus of cats and dogs declined, eventually companion animals

would be phased out, and we return to a more symbiotic relationship--

enjoyment at a distance."--Ingrid Newkirk



"I don't use the word 'pet.' I think it's speciest language. I prefer

'companion animal.' We would no longer allow... pet shops... Eventually

companion animals would be phased out." (Ingrid Newkirk - Harper's Magazine, Aug. 1988)





"One day, we would like an end to pet shops and the breeding of

animals. [Dogs] would pursue their natural lives in the wild....They would

have full lives, not wasting at home for someone to come home in the

evening and pet them and then sit there and watch TV." ("Where Would We Be Without Animals?", (Ingrid Newkirk -Chicago Daily Herald, March 1, 1990)



"We feel that animals have the same rights as a retarded human child"

(ALEX PACHECO - New York Times, January 14, 1989)
post #26 of 35
What I dont like about Peta is that they dont like things like zoos... Its like they would rather have the endangered species extinct! Some animals are even only alive in captivity, because poachers and farmers killed them all! Tigers for example, exist almost nearly in zoos, because stupid people wont stop poaching them, and farmers would kill one on sight, whether it ate a lamb or sheep or not! This gets me riled because the only reason wild animals eat livestock is because humans have taken all of their habitat and converted it to farmland, or hunted out all the prey in the area. Sure, some zoos do not take that good care of animals, inbreeding them just to have babies to sell, but many live in nice zoos with big spacious, natural surroundings, and even get to have their babies introduced back into the wild!

Sometimes I think humans arent mammals at all, but a form of virus because of the way we spread and consume. I fear for the children of the future.

of course, not all humans are living viruses.... look at this place, it is full of thte nicest most helpful people you could ever find.

Im glad I wont be alive when the world really goes to crap.

though we only have about 50 or so more years of oil. Oooh but I dont want to get started on oil companies and governments who supress new technology so they can keep filling their pockets. I could rant all day on that

If people like AmbertheBobcat couldn't keep exotics, then the only populations would be otu in the wild, and I already said what people do to the wild populations, and exotics bred illegaly in squalid conditions. What would happen to the animals that breeders bred? (illegal breeders if a exotic ban was passed) People who think owning an exotic is "really cool and I can show it off to my friends" would buy one illegaly and confine it to a small dark room, probably in the basement, for all its life. PETA can complain and try to ban all they like, it wont stop people from breeding exotics, and then you wont even have people like Amberthe Bobcat and other responsible exotic owners who can take care of them properly and give them loving homes.
post #27 of 35
Great point ...sad though.

Spotz
post #28 of 35
I cant believe some of their views on owning pets!!! i used to read loads of stuff from the PETA (but obviously it was their good side), but stopped years ago, dont know why. Glad i did now.
post #29 of 35
I used to be a peta supporter, and I used to think that they did do alot of good that got overlooked by people egar to condem them. I have to say though that now I really don't trust them anymore. I will not make any donations to their organization or hand out their information anymore. As far as not supporting zoo's, I do not support zoo's either. Zoo's actually capture animals out of the wild and reduce there populations further, captive breeding has no purpose other than entertainment value, and I think that if all the time, money, and energy that is put into zoo's were put into conserving natural habitat for animals in the wild it would do them a hell of a lot better than sitting in some cage. Sitting in cages won't prevent extinction in the long run, but conserving the spaces these animals live and creating sanctuaries where they can bring there number's up in the wild will ensure their future for years to come. Just think of how much land those millions of zoo dollars could buy and conserve every year. Zoo's also dispose of older animals(to make room for the money making babbies) and sell them to anyone. I have herd of cases where zoo animals were tracked to canned hunts and other such cruel sports or ended up at exotic animal auctions. Not supporting zoo's is not a peta thing, I just think conservation makes more sense in the long run. I think it's stupid to poor millions of dollars into something that can not prevent the extinction of wild animals as we know them.
post #30 of 35
This is disturbing as it is the last will and testimate of Ingrid Newkirk.
For all of you PETA supporters out there, think about what kind of derranged person would put a document like this to paper and ask yourself, why should I think about even listening to anything else this woman has to say?

Friends, I couldn't make this up if I wanted to and it's DIRECTLY OFF OF THE PETA WEBSITE!http://www.peta.org/feat/newkirk/will.html

DIRECTIONS FOR THE DISPOSITION OF THE REMAINS OF INGRID NEWKIRK

As someone who has dedicated a part of my life to the alleviation of animal suffering in various parts of the world, it is my wish that upon my death, my body be used to further that same goal. It is with this purpose in mind that I make the following directions and designations relating to the disposition of my final remains. I make these directions and designations after thorough consideration and pursuant to my firm belief in the purposes for which they are made.

1. Upon my death, it is my wish that my body be used in a manner that draws attention to needless animal suffering and exploitation. To accomplish this, I direct that my body be donated to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 501 Front Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, to be used in whatever manner it chooses in order to accomplish the specified purpose, with the hope that most of my body will be put to use in the United States, with parts also dispatched to awaken the public consciousness of governments and citizens in the United Kingdom, where I was born, in India, my beloved childhood home, and in Canada, Germany, and France.

2. While the final decision as to the use of my body remains with PETA, I make the following suggested directions:

a. That the “meat†of my body, or a portion thereof, be used for a human barbecue, to remind the world that the meat of a corpse is all flesh, regardless of whether it comes from a human being or another animal, and that flesh foods are not needed;

b. That my skin, or a portion thereof, be removed and made into leather products, such as purses, to remind the world that human skin and the skin of other animals is the same and that neither is “fabric†nor needed, and that some skin be tacked up outside the Indian Leather Fair each year to serve as a reminder of the government’s need to abate the suffering of Indian bullocks who, after a life of extreme and involuntary servitude, as I have seen firsthand, are exported all over the world in this form;

c. That in remembrance of the elephant-foot umbrella stands and tiger rugs I saw, as a child, offered for sale by merchants at Connaught Place in Delhi, my feet be removed and umbrella stands or other ornamentation be made from them, as a reminder of the depravity of killing innocent animals, such as elephants, in order that we might use their body parts for household items and decorations;

d. That one of my eyes be removed, mounted, and delivered to the administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a reminder that PETA will continue to be watching the agency until it stops poisoning and torturing animals in useless and cruel experiments; that the other is to be used as PETA sees fit;

e. That my pointing finger be delivered to Kenneth Feld, owner of Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, or to a circus museum to stand as the “Greatest Accusation on Earth†on behalf of the countless elephants, lions, tigers, bears, and other animals who have been kidnapped from their families and removed from their homelands in India, Thailand, Africa, and South America and deprived of all that is natural and pleasant to them, abused, and forced into involuntary servitude for the sake of cheap entertainment;

f. That my liver be vacuum-packed and shipped, in whole or in part, to France, to there be used in a public appeal to persuade shoppers not to support the vile practice of force-feeding geese and ducks for foie gras;

g. That one of my ears be removed, mounted, and sent to the Canadian Parliament to assist them in hearing, for the first time perhaps, the screams of the seals, bears, raccoons, foxes, and minks bludgeoned, trapped, and sometimes skinned alive for their pelts; that the other ear be removed, preserved, and displayed outside the Deonar abattoir in Mumbai to remind all who do business there that the screams of the cattle who are slaughtered within its walls are heard around the world;

h. That one of my thumbs be removed, mounted upwards on a plaque, and sent to the person or institution that, in the year of my death or thereabouts, PETA decides has done the most to promote alternatives to the use and abuse of animals in any area of their exploitation;

i. That one of my thumbs be mounted in a downward position and sent to the person or institution that, in the year of my death or thereabouts, has gone against the changing tide of societal opinion and frightened and hurt animals in some egregious manner;

j. That a little part of my heart be buried near the racetrack at Hockenheim, preferably near the Ferrari pits, where Michael Shumacher raced in and won the German Grand Prix;

k. That anything else be done with my body that PETA believes will serve to draw attention to and so abate the plight of exploited animals.

3. As a resident of Virginia, and pursuant to Virginia law, including
§ 54.1-2825 of the Virginia Code, I designate PETA as the “person†who shall make arrangements for carrying out the directions contained in this document for the disposition of my remains upon my death. If, at any time, PETA is unable or unwilling to carry out these directions, I designate, in the alternative, Daniel Mathews as the individual who shall make arrangements for carrying out the directions contained in this document for the disposition of my remains upon my death. If Daniel Mathews is unable or unwilling to carry out these directions as required, I authorize either of the two listed “persons†in this paragraph to designate a third party to make arrangements for carrying out the directions contained in this document for the disposition of my remains upon my death.

4. While I prefer that my directions be first executed in the United States, I also direct that parts of my body be transported to the United Kingdom, of which I also am a citizen, and to India, my beloved spiritual home, to be executed there. If my directions cannot be executed in any of these countries, I authorize the transport of my remains to any location where my disposition directions, in whole or in part, may be lawfully executed.

5. I authorize the person carrying out these directions to deviate from them in any manner he or she deems appropriate to further the purpose expressed herein. If any provision or provisions of this document shall be held to be invalid, illegal, unenforceable, or in conflict with the law of any jurisdiction, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › PETA stepped over the line