or Connect
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Pentagon's "black" operation
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Pentagon's "black" operation

post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 
The article is much too long to copy here, but this story is definitely a worthwhile read: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040524fa_fact
There must be an awful lot of disagreement at the Pentagon between the "suits" and the "uniforms", not to mention between Rumsfeld and the CIA.
post #2 of 3
Thread Starter 
This is the BBC's coverage; CNN also has a similar report.

Rumsfeld 'backed prisoner abuse'
US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has been accused of personally authorising a secret programme that encouraged abuse of Iraqi prisoners.
An article in The New Yorker magazine says Mr Rumsfeld extended a programme already in use in Afghanistan.

The operation encouraged coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners to gain intelligence, it says.

The Pentagon dismissed the claims as "outlandish, conspiratorial... filled with error and anonymous conjecture".

"No responsible official of the Department of Defense approved any programme that could conceivably have been intended to result in such abuses," a Pentagon spokesman said.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported on Sunday that army intelligence officers had devised a special plan to allow a Syrian prisoner at Abu Ghraib who was believed to have important information to be strip-searched and deprived of sleep.

Human Rights Watch legal adviser James Ross told the newspaper that the plan "clearly allows for a crossing of the line into abusive behaviour".

Instant interrogations

The New Yorker article was written by the distinguished American journalist Seymour Hersh, who first published the leaked secret report detailing abuses at Abu Ghraib, along with photos of prisoners being abused.

The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie... in a decision, approved last year by Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld
Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker
It quotes unnamed intelligence officials as saying the original programme gave blanket approval to kill or capture and interrogate "high value" targets in the war on terrorism.
The programme, Mr Hersh says, stemmed from frustrations about legal impediments to efforts to target al-Qaeda leaders after the start of US operations in Afghanistan in 2001.

According to Mr Hersh, it allowed commandos to carry out instant interrogations - using force if necessary - at CIA detention centres around the world.


Last year, Mr Rumsfeld and Stephen Cambone, his undersecretary for intelligence, expanded the scope of the programme and brought its methods to the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad, the article says.

Pictures of inmates being abused by American guards at the prison have sparked outrage in the US and beyond.
Mr Rumsfeld and senior Pentagon generals have been grilled by congressional committees.

During the hearings, Mr Rumsfeld said that abuse had never been sanctioned by senior commanders, and that the few who had engaged in illegal interrogation methods would be punished.

Seven soldiers have been charged.

Mr Hersh's allegations were rejected by Pentagon spokesman Lawrence Di Rita soon after the article appeared on The New Yorker website on Saturday.

"This story seems to reflect the fevered insights of those with little, if any, connection to the activities in the Department of Defense," Mr Di Rita said in a statement.

Story from BBC NEWS:

Published: 2004/05/16 08:03:21 GMT

post #3 of 3
This is quite interesting reading, and seems to be pretty fair reporting for a change.

Quite disturbing though, I wonder if these 7 soldiers will become scapegoats?

I don't know what else to say besides that everyone should read this.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Pentagon's "black" operation