Differences in valuation between cats and dogs in my rescue

crazy4strays

TCS Member
Thread starter
Top Cat
Joined
May 4, 2015
Messages
1,468
Purraise
306
Location
East Tennesee
So today, I saw the difference between the cat and the dog adoption contracts in the animal rescue that I foster for. The difference is pretty staggering. They have all these regulations for dog adopters. With cats, pretty much everyone can get one, unless you do really blatantly neglectful things.

The adopter of a dog has to pledge to never crop the dogs ears or dock their tail. They have to pledge to keep identification on the dog at all times. They have to pledge to keep the dog as a primarily indoor pet. If the dog ever dies or gets lost, they have to notify the rescue. They have to put them on heartworm preventative. They have to pledge never to let their kids ride the dog. The list goes on and on.

On the cat side, pretty much the only thing that one has to do is pledge to take them to the vet regularly, not to breed them, and to return them to the rescue if they can't keep them. People with cats are free to let them roam unattended, declaw them, don't have to notify the rescue if they get lost or die, don't have to microchip, etc. 

I feel frustrated that cats are valued so little. I talked to the rescue and said that I would personally be unable to continue fostering if I'm forced to adopt out my cats to a home that would declaw. They agreed to allow me to refuse adoption to someone on that basis.

I then told them that I would really like to see the cats microchipped before adoption because so many lost cats never make it home and those lost cats just increase our workload. They argued that they can't because they're already losing money on the cats and can't raise the fee. I told them to raise the fee from $35 to $50. They don't think that they can do that. But I pointed out that if someone can afford $35, they can probably afford $50. I said that if we're having slow adoptions, $10 or $15 isn't going to make much difference. I explained to them that they are trapped in a vicious cycle of getting so many cats, because they're not often able to send cats home and end up fostering owned cats, as well as homeless ones.

I'm to the point where I feel like giving up fostering, because the psychological stress of seeing so little value placed on cats, even by the rescue, is wearing me down. Just because we're flooded with cats doesn't mean that we should give them less veterinary care than dogs and make looser standards for adoption. Just because they're cats doesn't mean that we shouldn't care whether they get home when lost. 

 

Mamanyt1953

Rules my home with an iron paw
Staff Member
Forum Helper
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
31,276
Purraise
68,130
Location
North Carolina
Goddess bless you for the work that you are doing.

You might do a bit of digging in reference to the microchipping.  Get numbers on how many chipped animals get back to their homes, how many unchipped never do, how much it costs to keep a cat in a rescue per month, and the cost of chipping done on a mass basis.  Perhaps you can show them how much cheaper it is to return animals to their homes in black and white.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3

crazy4strays

TCS Member
Thread starter
Top Cat
Joined
May 4, 2015
Messages
1,468
Purraise
306
Location
East Tennesee
Thank you.

Yesterday when talking to them, I quoted to them the percentage of lost cats that never make it home (25%). They agreed and said that actually the percentages were probably even higher. 
 

Mamanyt1953

Rules my home with an iron paw
Staff Member
Forum Helper
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
31,276
Purraise
68,130
Location
North Carolina
OK...ask how much it costs to keep a cat per week at the shelter.  Then figure out how much money would be saved if a certain percentage of cats could be returned home rather than housed in the shelter.  Seeing the actual numbers might change their minds!  I'll bet it would be more cost effective in the long run to chip than to house the cats.
 
Top