News From Akron Ohio...Microchipping

jen

TCS Member
Thread starter
Top Cat
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
8,501
Purraise
3,009
Location
Hudson, OH
Sorry it's long but I thought I would share what I read in the paper today! I think this is such a good idea. I can't imagine how many lost cats are put to sleep before the owner even has a chance to really look for them. Does anyone know of other cities that do this?

Akron may help cats get to homes
City would buy chips to implant in felines so owners can be found
By Julie Wallace
Beacon Journal staff writer

Online poll: Should the city of Akron spend $10,000 for microchips to help find cats?
Never fear, wayward kitty. Help is on the way.

The city -- pending the City Council's approval -- plans to spend nearly $10,000 to make certain at least 1,000 cats can find their way home.

That money will buy microchips, which will be implanted beneath the felines' fur, to provide a permanent identification tag for cats that wander away from home. A simple scan of the chip, and the cat's owner will be identified via a voluntary registry to be maintained by the city.

Councilwoman Renee Greene, D-4, introduced the legislation Monday, which amends the city's controversial cat law that was passed about 18 months ago. The changes, she said, were formulated from the feedback the city received and will ensure ``the animal kingdom is well represented and protected by this City Council.''

Public hearings regarding the proposed changes will be at 2:15 p.m. and 7 p.m. Feb. 23 in the council's chambers on the third floor of City Hall.

The original cat law, which simply added cats to the city's laws governing dogs, gave the city's animal wardens the right to capture free-roaming felines, which can be killed if they aren't claimed from the Summit County animal shelter. The shelter already has the scanners that would be used on the microchips.

To say the law's passage got the fur flying wouldn't do justice to the uproar that followed.

Cat lovers protested in front of City Hall and before the council -- sometimes wearing cat costumes or masks and carrying cat stuffed animals. They corralled support from feline fanciers from around the world after word of the law spread via a Web site they established, and they led the efforts to get the council besieged by outraged e-mails from far-flung residents who'd probably never before heard of Akron.

In addition, a nonprofit group formed to fight the law, Citizens for Humane Animal Practices or CHAP, filed a lawsuit against the city, which is set to go to trial May 17 in Summit County Common Pleas Court.

The legislation introduced Monday adds the owners' registry as well as a $10 penalty to be paid by owners whose cats are picked up and returned to them.

In addition, the city also plans to host four, low-cost or no-cost spay-and-neuter clinics during the year and in subsequent years, said Jeff Fusco, the city's deputy service director who worked on the plans.

Fusco said the fees are still in flux but the city most likely will charge about $10 for the microchips, which are about the size of a grain of rice.

They will be implanted with the help of the Summit County Veterinary Medical Association, which also is working with the city for the clinics.

That's far below the $70 to $120 that the chips normally cost, and the registry will be maintained for free -- also freeing up the annual maintenance fee most owners have to pay.

At the clinics, cat owners who meet federal guidelines for poverty will be able to have their pets -- as long as the number is within reason -- treated for free, Fusco said. Details on the clinics will be announced later.

Attorney Polly Grunfeld Sack, who is representing CHAP, said Monday she was grateful that the city was at least taking a look at the law. She applauded the city's plan for the spaying and neutering clinics -- saying that effort, rather than the microchipping -- is the way to address the city's cat problem.

Sack said 1,000 microchips cover only a fraction of the cats out there -- meaning those belonging to owners who aren't among the lucky 1,000 and who are unable to afford the expense on their own still face the risk of being captured and killed.

``Certainly, it's a step in the right direction... but there are so many better ways to spend that money,'' Sack said. ``I don't want to fault the city for anything, but it still doesn't deal with the fatal flaws in their ordinance. This indeed is a Band-Aid.

``The low-cost spay and neuter is starting to get to the problem -- that's the only effective way to deal with free-roaming cats.''

Mayor Don Plusquellic said the city -- unlike what has been said -- isn't doing anything different than many communities across the country in regards to its animal overpopulation and that people ``have blown this out of proportion.''

He said the program introduced Monday will help those pet owners who are struggling financially -- fulfilling the city's responsibility to ensure responsible pet owners don't lose their animals.

``We think we're fulfilling our obligation,'' he said. ``They've developed the worst-case scenario, and we're trying to prevent that.''

In other business Monday, the council approved the $186 million capital budget, which spells out the projects on the table for the year.

The budget, which rose by $3 million from its initial allowance due to carryover projects from 2003, includes the newly added plan to create a dog park on Memorial Parkway, across from Hickory Street.

Dogs will be allowed to roam off-leash within the fenced-in area of the park once it is established, which could be as soon as this summer. The move follows the lead of 14 other cities in Ohio, which already have set up similar dog-specific areas.
 

tnr1

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
7,980
Purraise
13
Location
Northern Virginia
Akron has had such a horrible history of killing cats...that I am taking a "wait and see" approach to this news. Yes, it is good that they will microchip owned cats...but they still euthanize many, many feral cats and are completely against TNR. I do hope they at least implement the spay/neuter program.

Katie
 

tnr1

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
7,980
Purraise
13
Location
Northern Virginia
Spin City
Published 1-29-04 (Akron, Ohio)
Two years ago, the city council in Akron, Ohio, passed an ordinance that, in essence, outlawed outdoor cats. Traps were handed out to anyone who asked for them, and dozens, then hundreds and eventually thousands of cats were captured and put to death. (To learn more about the ordinance — and what ALDF and its allies are doing to fight it — click here.)

For months, animal advocates who complained about this cruel practice all received the same response from the city council: silence. But after ALDF encouraged its supporters to send the council e-mails demanding that the ordinance be changed, the council finally did something. It began responding with a form letter that attempts to downplay the controversy — and the cityâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s responsibility for the thousands of cats its policies have doomed.

After reviewing the councilâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s form letter, experts on the Akron situation tell ALDF thereâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s only one way to describe it: Itâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s a load of hooey.


The Council's Letter: “There has been no ‘round-upâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji] of feral cats by City animal control officers.â€

Reality: “The city gives a live-animal trap to anyone who asks for one, and the vast majority [of captured animals] turned over to city officials are killed the first day,†says ALDF member attorney J. Jeffrey Holland, who is representing six Akron residents in a lawsuit against the city. “Whether or not you call that a ‘round-upâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji] of cats is a matter of semantics. The bottom line is the cityâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s policy has resulted in more than 2,000 cats being killed.â€


The Council's Letter: “Residents are instructed by wardens to place food and water in the trap...and to immediately telephone our Customer Service Division once a cat has been captured. Our goal has been to respond within 2 to 4 hours.â€

Reality: “The city cannot claim to know how long cats are being held in live traps,†Holland points out. “The city has put the care of these animals in the hands of any unknown, untrained residents who ask, making the assumption that these individuals will act responsibly. There is no way to weed out violent criminal offenders, the mentally ill, cat haters or those who are simply irresponsible.â€


The Council's Letter: “Wardens specifically advise trap holders to remove the food from the trap and close the doors on weekends...to prevent an animal from being left in the trap when wardens are not available.â€

Reality: “Witnesses have reported seeing baited, open traps on weekends and during very hot and cold weather,†reports Deanne Christman-Resch, co-chair of Citizens for Humane Animal Practices (CHAP), an Akron-based grassroots organization that was formed to oppose the cat ordinance. “Many cats and kittens have been impounded early on Monday mornings. We can only speculate as to how long these animals were confined in traps.â€


The Council's Letter: “We are not aware of a single instance where an animal control officer of the City of Akron has removed an identification tag from an impounded cat....â€

Reality: On June 22, 2003, The Cleveland Plain Dealer ran an article in which Akronâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s former director of Animal Control, Glenn James, admitted that it was possible that collars were being removed from trapped cats. (To see the article, go to www.summitcare.org.) And one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the city found her catâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s collar in the street after he disappeared — and was presumably euthanized.

“Whether a collar is removed by a city employee or a city resident who has been entrusted with a cat cage, the result is the same — and the cityâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s policy is responsible,†says Christman-Resch.


The Council's Letter: “A healthy cat, one that is obviously socialized and able to be redeemed and/or adopted, is [set aside for adoption].â€

Reality: “Cats in Akron are being killed for being ‘flea infestedâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji] or other conditions that are readily treatable,†says Holland. “We also believe that some members of the shelter staff arenâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]t capable of telling a socialized cat from a feral one. Many otherwise friendly cats will react aggressively when cornered in a cage and placed in unfamiliar surroundings with other caged animals.â€

“Cats and kittens are routinely killed [in Akron] for the mild fungal disease ringworm as well as for having diarrhea or being ‘mean,â€[emoji]8482[/emoji]†Christman-Resch adds. “They are also killed for treatable injuries they might have sustained when they were simply trying to get out of the traps.â€


The Council's Letter: “The only method of euthanasia that has been used for any cat is intraperitoneal injection.... Contrary to publicized assertions, the ‘heart stickâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji] or intracardiac injection method has never been used by the County Shelter to euthanize an Akron cat.â€

Reality: “We have also spoken with former shelter employees who say that the ‘heart stickâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji] method has been common practice there,†says Christman-Resch. “Sodium pentobarbital is injected directly into an animalâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s chest. If it hits the heart, death comes quickly. If not, it can be a very slow process. Either way, the animal is killed very painfully. Shelter employees have used this inhumane method of euthanasia to kill thousands of animals.â€


The Council's Letter: “Contrary to information disseminated widely by internet e-mail, there has been no charge made to redeem or adopt a [captured] cat in Akron.â€

Reality: “It is common practice in Akron to serve people who pick up their cats from the shelter with a criminal charge of allowing cats to run at large — a misdemeanor offense. The charge for a first offense has been $80, but the council recently voted to increase that by 50 percent,†says Christman-Resch. “There is also an adoption fee, even for nonprofit animal rescue groups who intend to rehabilitate and adopt out the animals as a public service.â€


The Bottom Line: “Obviously, the Akron city council is trying to ‘spinâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji] its way out of trouble,†says ALDF Executive Director Joyce Tischler. “But I can think of a much better way for the council to make this controversy disappear: change the law. If they stopped the indiscriminate trapping and killing of outdoor cats, these outraged letters and e-mails would stop coming.â€

Until that happens, Tischler says, CHAP, Holland and ALDF will continue to fight Akronâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]s callous cat policy.

Updates on this struggle will be posted here when theyâ€[emoji]8482[/emoji]re available.
 

charmsdad

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
604
Purraise
1
I strongly support microchipping. We have all our crew chipped (5 dogs, 8 cats), and have chipped the foster/rescue animals we've taken in over the years. I've also personally implanted a HUGE number of chips for the local shelter. At the same time, I question whether this is appropriate as a public expense. If it is, how about the dogs? IMO, people that have made the choice to have an animal (and it's a wonderful choice - but a choice none the less) need to be responsible for their own related expenses. Of course, I also believe people should be responsible for their own children and their own bills - so I guess I'm in the minority.

George
 

tnr1

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
7,980
Purraise
13
Location
Northern Virginia
George...if you have been reading about Akron..the issue hasn't been around them picking up and euthanizing owned dogs..but owned cats. Over 2,000+ cats were euthanized in 2002.

Katie
 

charmsdad

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
604
Purraise
1
George...if you have been reading about Akron..the issue hasn't been around them picking up and euthanizing owned dogs..but owned cats. Over 2,000+ cats were euthanized in 2002.
That's very sad, but I guess what I'm saying is if the city is going to pay for microchipping cats why not also pay for dogs? While I do see that the city's policy with cats seems to be at issue, if the city is going to pay for this ID (and, as I mentioned, I'm not one to believe in public funding for somehting like this - but then that's for each community to decide) aren't they selectively telling dog owners that their pet has less value and is not worthy of this public funding? While I don't live there, I would bet this will come up of the city does decide to pay for this.

George
 

tnr1

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
7,980
Purraise
13
Location
Northern Virginia
George..I'm sure it will be...and obviously there is an issue over the number they have ordered with regards to cats as well..per the original article:

Attorney Polly Grunfeld Sack, who is representing CHAP, said Monday she was grateful that the city was at least taking a look at the law. She applauded the city's plan for the spaying and neutering clinics -- saying that effort, rather than the microchipping -- is the way to address the city's cat problem.

Sack said 1,000 microchips cover only a fraction of the cats out there -- meaning those belonging to owners who aren't among the lucky 1,000 and who are unable to afford the expense on their own still face the risk of being captured and killed.

``Certainly, it's a step in the right direction... but there are so many better ways to spend that money,'' Sack said. ``I don't want to fault the city for anything, but it still doesn't deal with the fatal flaws in their ordinance. This indeed is a Band-Aid.


I'm just hoping that the spay/neuter clinic is approved and I am glad that CHAP is keeping an eye on the situation.

Katie
 
Top