What is the deal with grain-free? I thought it was always because of the carb content, but the foods that are grain-free are sometimes higher in carbs than then ones that are not.
I'm very... how do I say this... suspicious when it comes to putting descriptions of things out on the label as part of the name. So many times it's really just a marketing thing, and while it may not be a lie, there's not necessarily any true value to it either. This is very true with pharmaceuticals (ever looked at the ingredients in Excedrin vs Excedrin Migraine?). I also notice that it is that way with human foods as well. Something is touted as being healthy because it's organic, or natural, or whatever other happy-sounding label you want to throw on it. And turns out it's just as bad as the next thing because it's loaded with sugar (natural sugar, but sugar nonetheless). Don't get me started on things with the word "diet" on the label...
I'm also not the type to buy into something being healthy just because studies say so. Studies change they minds every couple decades or so it seems. Remember saturated fat? It used to be the devil, then suddenly it wasn't. I take these things with a grain (no pun intended) of salt now.
Anyway, sorry I went off on a tangent there, but just explaining where I'm coming from. It's so easy for someone to make a small adjustment without adding value, and then slap a few words on the label to hike up the price. So, why is grain-free good? And is a crappy grain-free better than a higher-quality non-grain-free? I am legitimately curious because most brands out there have a "grain-free" version, but when I look at it from a DMA-point of view, it doesn't seem any better than it's non-grain-free counterpart.
I'm very... how do I say this... suspicious when it comes to putting descriptions of things out on the label as part of the name. So many times it's really just a marketing thing, and while it may not be a lie, there's not necessarily any true value to it either. This is very true with pharmaceuticals (ever looked at the ingredients in Excedrin vs Excedrin Migraine?). I also notice that it is that way with human foods as well. Something is touted as being healthy because it's organic, or natural, or whatever other happy-sounding label you want to throw on it. And turns out it's just as bad as the next thing because it's loaded with sugar (natural sugar, but sugar nonetheless). Don't get me started on things with the word "diet" on the label...
I'm also not the type to buy into something being healthy just because studies say so. Studies change they minds every couple decades or so it seems. Remember saturated fat? It used to be the devil, then suddenly it wasn't. I take these things with a grain (no pun intended) of salt now.
Anyway, sorry I went off on a tangent there, but just explaining where I'm coming from. It's so easy for someone to make a small adjustment without adding value, and then slap a few words on the label to hike up the price. So, why is grain-free good? And is a crappy grain-free better than a higher-quality non-grain-free? I am legitimately curious because most brands out there have a "grain-free" version, but when I look at it from a DMA-point of view, it doesn't seem any better than it's non-grain-free counterpart.