I'm not sure if this is the best place for this. If there's a better place, feel free to move it, mods.
Anyway, one thing that I've been reading a lot lately is that a lot of rescues make it virtually impossible to adopt animals. So people who would provide a good home to an animal, give up finally, after being humiliated and rejected, and go to a breeder, a Craigslist ad, or a pet store, thus fueling the homeless animal problem.
A lot of dog rescues insist on only adopting to a family with a fenced yard, insist that if you want a toy or small breed you can't have any small children, and also ban families with small children from large breeds as well. Some places also insist that you can't adopt if you work full time. Some cat rescues even do this supposedly! Some places don't adopt any animals at all to farms.
Some places turn you down if you're a senior citizen, even if you have a plan for who will take care of the animal if you become unable. So who does that leave, if families with children, working people, and senior citizens can't adopt? The unemployed, the self-employed, and the millionaires?
I'm guessing that maybe they aren't as picky with adopting cats out, but who knows?
I've heard that some places make a clause in the contract that says that they are the legal owner of the animal and can show up unannounced and do home visits and fine you if they don't like what they see.
My rescue seems pretty reasonable, so far. After reading stories of people getting turned down to adopt from rescues, I was afraid to even apply to foster for one, but luckily my rescue doesn't seem to go overboard on things.
For adopting, I think that they just try to make sure that the cat is a good fit for the family, that the family is responsible, and that the veterinary references come out good. I don't know as much about their dog adoption program, as I don't foster dogs.
What has been your experience with rescues? Is it really that common for them to go that far overboard or are these just a few rare instances that make the good rescues look bad?
Anyway, one thing that I've been reading a lot lately is that a lot of rescues make it virtually impossible to adopt animals. So people who would provide a good home to an animal, give up finally, after being humiliated and rejected, and go to a breeder, a Craigslist ad, or a pet store, thus fueling the homeless animal problem.
A lot of dog rescues insist on only adopting to a family with a fenced yard, insist that if you want a toy or small breed you can't have any small children, and also ban families with small children from large breeds as well. Some places also insist that you can't adopt if you work full time. Some cat rescues even do this supposedly! Some places don't adopt any animals at all to farms.
Some places turn you down if you're a senior citizen, even if you have a plan for who will take care of the animal if you become unable. So who does that leave, if families with children, working people, and senior citizens can't adopt? The unemployed, the self-employed, and the millionaires?
I'm guessing that maybe they aren't as picky with adopting cats out, but who knows?
I've heard that some places make a clause in the contract that says that they are the legal owner of the animal and can show up unannounced and do home visits and fine you if they don't like what they see.
My rescue seems pretty reasonable, so far. After reading stories of people getting turned down to adopt from rescues, I was afraid to even apply to foster for one, but luckily my rescue doesn't seem to go overboard on things.
For adopting, I think that they just try to make sure that the cat is a good fit for the family, that the family is responsible, and that the veterinary references come out good. I don't know as much about their dog adoption program, as I don't foster dogs.
What has been your experience with rescues? Is it really that common for them to go that far overboard or are these just a few rare instances that make the good rescues look bad?