- Joined
- May 14, 2014
- Messages
- 125
- Purraise
- 96
I am hoping some people might have knowledge or experience concerning the following situation:
October 2013 I took my 7 year old cat in for blood work for a dental cleaning. Normally, the vet takes blood from the leg, but the veins were so inaccessible that he used the jugular vein and said even that was rather difficult. Also noted was a two pound weight loss since the prior visit and stated my cat was 7% dehydrated. Nothing was ever mentioned about this being potentially serious, nothing was mentioned about what it might mean such as kidney issues, nothing was said about considering the use of subcutaneous fluid. Nothing. I always provide fresh water every day in a large bowl and provide mostly wet food.
Five months later my cat had an annual exam and it was noted that he lost another pound in those five months. The cat seemed otherwise healthy and normal in all respects.
I'm not a vet and I've never dealt with this before, but it seems to me that 7% (or more given the additional weight loss) dehydration is an issue that should raise some concern. Yes? No?
The reason I am asking is that less than two months later (May 11, 2014) my cat died of a heart attack. At the emergency vet I was told he was so severely dehydrated that they could not find the jugular vein in which to insert a needle. Ultrasound and x-ray showed no abnormalities at all. There is too much to discuss about the event itself but the heart attack was stress-induced (inadvertently by me - I was only trying to help) combined with his compromised circulatory system (i.e. thick blood). I am just wracking my head whether the dehydration was something that should have been addressed long before this happened.
October 2013 I took my 7 year old cat in for blood work for a dental cleaning. Normally, the vet takes blood from the leg, but the veins were so inaccessible that he used the jugular vein and said even that was rather difficult. Also noted was a two pound weight loss since the prior visit and stated my cat was 7% dehydrated. Nothing was ever mentioned about this being potentially serious, nothing was mentioned about what it might mean such as kidney issues, nothing was said about considering the use of subcutaneous fluid. Nothing. I always provide fresh water every day in a large bowl and provide mostly wet food.
Five months later my cat had an annual exam and it was noted that he lost another pound in those five months. The cat seemed otherwise healthy and normal in all respects.
I'm not a vet and I've never dealt with this before, but it seems to me that 7% (or more given the additional weight loss) dehydration is an issue that should raise some concern. Yes? No?
The reason I am asking is that less than two months later (May 11, 2014) my cat died of a heart attack. At the emergency vet I was told he was so severely dehydrated that they could not find the jugular vein in which to insert a needle. Ultrasound and x-ray showed no abnormalities at all. There is too much to discuss about the event itself but the heart attack was stress-induced (inadvertently by me - I was only trying to help) combined with his compromised circulatory system (i.e. thick blood). I am just wracking my head whether the dehydration was something that should have been addressed long before this happened.