OK, many of us have had to euthanise a dear, beloved pet at one time or another due to a deathly illness or injury where the animal was suffering. I have had to do this (I believe I've told you all of Delilah) and cried like a baby in the process.
OK, well, what about human euthanasia?
For instance, were my neurological disorder to completely cripple me tomorrow and finally take any and all hand/eye/movement/leg movement and cooridnation, where I would just be a concious in an inoperable body and require being taken care 24/7 for the next 40 years without there ever being any hope for a recovery...well, I wouldn't want to live like that. To be a burden to others or live my remaining days miserable in a nursing facility. Forget that! I wouldn't and I won't!
So, if a PERSON has a deadly injury, but it will take a year for their bodies to succumb or if they were so sick that they weren't capable of taking care of themselves and, thus, living lives that they consider unhappy and miserable, would euthanasia be justifiable?
It is for animals, why not humans? Is what Dr. Kavorkian did wrong?
My personal insights, because I have had such thoughts because of my problem, is that it IS acceptable. And, I counter those who might offer they don't think that's right, because, unless they have had to face a possible/potential situation themselves or love someone (Human wise I mean) they can obviously see the misery and unhappiness that living in such a way causes, then it is, indeed, difficult to have a scale to judge by.
OK, I know that this is a HEAVY subject (Geez, using that word might be dating me), but I really am curious as to the general thought among so many caring/sensative people. Besides, it seems to be a very controversial topic publicly, so given kittyfoots prodding of controversial subjet matter (and my own), I thought that a thought provoking subject, as such, would be interesting.
OK, well, what about human euthanasia?
For instance, were my neurological disorder to completely cripple me tomorrow and finally take any and all hand/eye/movement/leg movement and cooridnation, where I would just be a concious in an inoperable body and require being taken care 24/7 for the next 40 years without there ever being any hope for a recovery...well, I wouldn't want to live like that. To be a burden to others or live my remaining days miserable in a nursing facility. Forget that! I wouldn't and I won't!
So, if a PERSON has a deadly injury, but it will take a year for their bodies to succumb or if they were so sick that they weren't capable of taking care of themselves and, thus, living lives that they consider unhappy and miserable, would euthanasia be justifiable?
It is for animals, why not humans? Is what Dr. Kavorkian did wrong?
My personal insights, because I have had such thoughts because of my problem, is that it IS acceptable. And, I counter those who might offer they don't think that's right, because, unless they have had to face a possible/potential situation themselves or love someone (Human wise I mean) they can obviously see the misery and unhappiness that living in such a way causes, then it is, indeed, difficult to have a scale to judge by.
OK, I know that this is a HEAVY subject (Geez, using that word might be dating me), but I really am curious as to the general thought among so many caring/sensative people. Besides, it seems to be a very controversial topic publicly, so given kittyfoots prodding of controversial subjet matter (and my own), I thought that a thought provoking subject, as such, would be interesting.