I did a web search on "safety of raw cat food" to get some more detailed information about how cats are able to avoid getting sick by eating it. One website I found is pathetic: Tufts University claims there have been no studies on raw cat food that prove it is beneficial, but studies have been done that prove it is dangerous. Then the author went on to say cats need corn and grains, so those ingredients are not fillers and a cat without food allergies should eat them. Ugh. How can a cat and dog expert think commercial food not made of real human quality meat that is full of ingredients carnivores don't eat in the wild is good for our pets and there is absolutely no proof cats should eat raw food instead? I can't say the writer is wrong about everything because one point is "human grade" does not guarantee a total lack of harmful bacteria, but saying it is good to eat something like Science Diet looks like a so-called animal expert does not know much about feline nutrition and cooked cat food sold in stores. Obviously I was only able to believe a few sentences in that long article and assumed BARFfeeders would hate every word.