Cigarettes vs. e-Cigarettes: Which Is Less Environmentally Harmful?
Environmental protection may not be a factor in most people's decision to switch to vaping, but it's a great argument, and something I personally have tried to take one step farther by using repairable atomizers and "advanced personal vaporizers", a.k.a. battery mods.
Quote:
Although it is also a controversial product, electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, could help reduce this toxic burden. The devices use a small amount of power to vaporize nicotine, which is then inhaled. Some are marketed as entirely nicotine free, and many have flavorings added. Many are advertised as helping smokers wean themselves off their habit.
Most electronic cigarettes are reusable, meaning only a tiny amount of vapor needs to be refilled for each use. This means they are potentially more eco-friendly than going through mountains of single-use products, which take resources to produce. e-Cigarettes are typically powered by reusable batteries, and are often charged via USB ports.
Because electronic cigarettes don’t produce smoke, they are much less risky to non-users and to air quality in general.
Most electronic cigarettes are reusable, meaning only a tiny amount of vapor needs to be refilled for each use. This means they are potentially more eco-friendly than going through mountains of single-use products, which take resources to produce. e-Cigarettes are typically powered by reusable batteries, and are often charged via USB ports.
Because electronic cigarettes don’t produce smoke, they are much less risky to non-users and to air quality in general.
Environmental protection may not be a factor in most people's decision to switch to vaping, but it's a great argument, and something I personally have tried to take one step farther by using repairable atomizers and "advanced personal vaporizers", a.k.a. battery mods.























