I do check the ratings, but I find that most of the time, on rotten tomatoes at least, even the critics' reviews are not real critiques of the film, and they always agree with the movies' popularity. For example, both of the highest grossing movies that are in theaters now, Mission Impossible and Sherlock Holmes, are garbage IMO. But even the critics have given them top ratings. Based on what?? The cool action scenes? I don't get it..
Last night, I went to see Sherlock Holmes, at the BF's insistence..And I was so incredibly disappointed, and for the life of me I can't figure out what it is that people find appealing in this movie. What made Sherlock Holmes such a cool character was his ability to use logic and deductive reasoning and to come to incredible conclusions based on very little evidence...But in the movie, that was just not there.
And then, Mission Impossible, was just as bad, I don't even want to get into that .Maybe it's because the prequels were so unmemorable for both of these movies, that I no longer remember what happened, and both of these movies were counting on viewers to remember what they originally liked...Maybe that's why I am finding these movies so idiotic lol...
Sorry for going on this rant, it's really because feel irritated that I was asked to go to the movies and sit through 2 hours of garbage LOL...