- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 71
- Purraise
- 12
Hi there ~
I have a thread going where I ask about Atopica, and it goes into some detail about my cat Taz and her recent bouts of cystitis and rodent ulcer. I've seen Metacam mentioned here and I reallized the emergency vet gave Taz a shot of it during her overnight stay for the bladder issue. I called the vets today and told them I was a bit freaked by the use of Metacam based on what I was reading - I was told by the Dr.'s assistant "yes, there is alarming info out there, I'm sorry it freaked you out, but she only had one shot and we feel she'll be fine".
In truth I've only read one article so far, but it did freak me out. This is a 9 yr old, overweight cat that was brought in because she was straining to urinate. Turns out she had no ctrystals, an empty bladder (no blockage, I didn't realize then how rare a blockage is in female cats) and her bladder ultrasound was clear. They were unable to get a clean urine sample and the small amount they did get was leaked onto the table. The emergency vet told me there was a minute trace of bacteria, but she couldn't be sure it didn't come from the table. When I was at my regular vet, she read the report to me and it said no bacteria present. It also didn't give a ph for the urine, which seemed to surprise my vet.
So my question is; if vets know there is a potential problem with Metacam and cats, why give it when there must be so much to chose from? My cat has never had any bloodwork done - for all I know she could be a diabetic - the emergency vet surley didn't know.
I did tell them today that I wanted it put into her chart that she never get Metacam again. Am I over doing it?
Thanks for letting me vent!
Now I'm off to read up on Metacam...which I probably should have done before I called the vet's office!
I have a thread going where I ask about Atopica, and it goes into some detail about my cat Taz and her recent bouts of cystitis and rodent ulcer. I've seen Metacam mentioned here and I reallized the emergency vet gave Taz a shot of it during her overnight stay for the bladder issue. I called the vets today and told them I was a bit freaked by the use of Metacam based on what I was reading - I was told by the Dr.'s assistant "yes, there is alarming info out there, I'm sorry it freaked you out, but she only had one shot and we feel she'll be fine".
In truth I've only read one article so far, but it did freak me out. This is a 9 yr old, overweight cat that was brought in because she was straining to urinate. Turns out she had no ctrystals, an empty bladder (no blockage, I didn't realize then how rare a blockage is in female cats) and her bladder ultrasound was clear. They were unable to get a clean urine sample and the small amount they did get was leaked onto the table. The emergency vet told me there was a minute trace of bacteria, but she couldn't be sure it didn't come from the table. When I was at my regular vet, she read the report to me and it said no bacteria present. It also didn't give a ph for the urine, which seemed to surprise my vet.
So my question is; if vets know there is a potential problem with Metacam and cats, why give it when there must be so much to chose from? My cat has never had any bloodwork done - for all I know she could be a diabetic - the emergency vet surley didn't know.
I did tell them today that I wanted it put into her chart that she never get Metacam again. Am I over doing it?
Thanks for letting me vent!
Now I'm off to read up on Metacam...which I probably should have done before I called the vet's office!