My guess would be that they turn a blind eye when it's not a lot of bandwidth but once it's a video or tons of large image files they do something about it. I can't blame them really - bandwidth is the most expensive part of hosting a website - not storing the images on their hard disk. A while ago we were short of space and had to ask forum members to go easy on uploading pics as well.
And yes, for a fee you can do anything you like
Just get your own paid account with any host and link to those images all you like. When you exceed your allocated and paid for bandwidth, they will tell you and charge you for the extra.
It's just not what Imagestation is about - they're a free service that wants you to store your photo albums there and get people to view those images ON THEIR SITE to increase their pageviews and generate income for them from advertising. It's their business model and it's perfectly legitimate. That they turn a blind eye to the occasional remote linking is very nice of them. Had they wanted to, they could deactivate all of it automatically by setting up the server to prevent remote linking.
Sorry to spoil the Imagestation bashing party
Just thought to bring you the other side of the story, as a webmaster would see it. I dare anyone here to offer a totally free image and video storage service that allows remote linking - you'd be broke within a week and in debt too
And yes, for a fee you can do anything you like
It's just not what Imagestation is about - they're a free service that wants you to store your photo albums there and get people to view those images ON THEIR SITE to increase their pageviews and generate income for them from advertising. It's their business model and it's perfectly legitimate. That they turn a blind eye to the occasional remote linking is very nice of them. Had they wanted to, they could deactivate all of it automatically by setting up the server to prevent remote linking.
Sorry to spoil the Imagestation bashing party