Declawing would never be nationally illegal in the U.S., however, many organizations are pushing to make it law that vets must first provide educational materials on the declaw procedure and alternatives to declawing - orgs are pushing for a 1 or 2 week period between people being given this material and it being legal to proceed with a procedure. There's no traction to this that I'm aware of.Originally Posted by Willowy
It's a problem. I think the vet associations need to take a stronger stance on routine de-claws. although of course I'd rather see it made illegal, but that probably won't happen. But the vet associations do have a lot of clout, and they could make a difference.
I don't think any organizations will be able to make much difference, EXCEPT the vet associations. And, as much as I'd like to see bans, I know that laws probably wouldn't help (any kind of law; outright banning, waiting period, informed consent, etc.), because Americans are notoriously terrible at obeying laws. But if, say, the AVMA had clear guidelines pertaining to de-claws, and censured vets who didn't follw those guidelines, I do think that would make a difference.Originally Posted by LDG
Declawing would never be nationally illegal in the U.S., however, many organizations are pushing to make it law that vets must first provide educational materials on the declaw procedure and alternatives to declawing - orgs are pushing for a 1 or 2 week period between people being given this material and it being legal to proceed with a procedure. There's no traction to this that I'm aware of.
All the rescues in my area require you to sign a no declaw agreement. But there are still some rescues that just offer you the declaw information and always recommend against it. And, yes, it is amputation. It is the same thing is if you were to cut off to the first digit joint of all of your fingers.Originally Posted by Calvin&I
Calvin's rescue has no declaw cause and her foster mom was ok about it. I had to sign a no declaw clause while adopting Hobbes.
When I was interviewed by calvin's rescue, one lady asked me if I would consider it and I expressed my absolute objection to it. Then when we went to get Calvin, my husband casually asked what she thought of declawing and the fostwr said that of 3 of her cats, she got the 1st 2 declawed and the one who got the laser procedure was fine, the traditional one had personality changes. So she suggested if we were to get it done, we should go for the laser. We told her we did not plan to. It's something I just cannot fathom doing. That was a qualitatively "better" rescue than hobbes's but has no clause against declawing.Originally Posted by Feralvr
All the rescues in my area require you to sign a no declaw agreement. But there are still some rescues that just offer you the declaw information and always recommend against it. And, yes, it is amputation. It is the same thing is if you were to cut off to the first digit joint of all of your fingers. Makes me sick.