FerrisCat, thanks much for your thoughts.... They, of course, bring up yet more questions.....
Part of my problem is I've been to several cat shows, and talked to many of the exhibitors (they're almost universally fun people that are eager to talk about their examples of the breed they work in), and shot candids. But, I haven't been at a show that had a portrait photographer for me to see how they worked with their clients.
>All photos of a breeder's cats represent their program, both the good and >the bad. I do not want a bad photo of my show-cat out there for the public >to dissect--when I select something for my website or for publication, I >want to look at that photo and think "my goodness, that is exactly why I >am so proud of this lovely creature." Not "oh lord, look at that terrible >profile, that horrible boning, ect. . ."
I absolutely understand your logic. When I do portraits (whether cats, dogs, people, or a combination), I ALWAYS go through them with my client. We, in combination, rate the images - me usually photographically, them esthetically. I typically reject more images than the client because I see some photographic flaw will make it a less-than-perfect image (if the client disagrees, however, I'll keep the image because there's some emotional connection or something the image shows that the client likes). On the other hand, I had one client point out a very minute ear position flaw, on an otherwise excellent shot, that she didn't like. That image was marked to be trashed. I can't imagine any photographer that's trying to portray their subject as flatteringly as possible that would EVER put an unflattering image out in public. Images my clients don't like never get seen by anyone but me and the client.
Is this a problem with photographers putting images the client doesn't like out for people to see? Why? If an image doesn't portray your subject as beautifully as possible why would any photographer use it?
>Cat photography is not just about lighting. It's about being able to >represent the living standard of a breed on film, and that is in itself an art.
I have SOME understanding of different breeds but not nearly the expertise of a person that is a breeder. So, I always have my clients provide feedback and have them help me portray their cat (or dog or person) as perfectly as possible. Do other photographers NOT let the client be involved? If not, why? I'd never presume to know your cats better than you - best angle, best side, most perfect pose, etc... Is it a photographer ego thing?
>A good feline photographer also has to be a cat whisperer of sorts--you will >need to learn to work with a variety of cat temperaments in order to >manipulate them into giving you the best shot possible.
SO FAR, that hasn't been a problem. I've had a MUCH better rapport with the animals I've photographed than most people I've done! Whether for the local shelter, CCI, or whatever I find it much easier and more enjoyable to photograph cats and other animals, than people...
>Finally, you will absolutely have to have your photography area secured lest >a cat gets loose from your both. If you lose cats into the showhall on your >first gig, word will get out and people will not be interested in paying for >your services.
Again, because I haven't actually seen a show photographer doing portraits, I don't know how they normally do this. Does the photographer work in a separate room? Or in a regular booth with the owner? I can't imagine any owner leaving their cat with the photographer, so is having cats escape normally a problem?
Anyhow, thanks again for your thoughts, and please keep them coming. It's all part of the learning process to me. I knew the mechanical aspects would be pretty easy to learn and easily quantified, but I'd need advice to learn other aspects. Thanks all.