What do you think of people who pay for a cat or a dog? I must admit I highly disapprove because there are millions of cats and dogs who are homeless on the street or in shelters. Am I being judgmental?
Originally Posted by LDG
I have no problem with the idea that animals be bred for genetic lines, and if someone wants to buy a particular breed, do it from a reputable breeder.
Personally, we rescue, so we support rescue adoptions. But my grandpa raised sheep and chickens to breed them for show, so I understand that purpose.
I do agree with Nat that you have to be careful about the wording, because I think it's irresponsible to give away rescues. Companion animals should not be free, period. Too risky for the animal without some type of commitment (IMO). Technically they need to be purchased, whether it's from a rescue or a shelter.
My wife and I bought our Russian Blue (Nina) from a very responsible breeder who interviewed us three times before she would let us buy her. She let us adopt Nina's mother Deli, who was fixed and retired after that litter, for free. When we lost her to lymphoma, our vet asked us if we'd like to adopt little Nicky, who was a stray hanging around the vet's office, for free. All that being said, I will have to agree with you as far as paying for a companion animal, but I would also add that interviews and home visits would be nice, too. Just because someone has the money to buy a pet, doesn't necessarily mean that they should have one.Originally Posted by LDG
I have no problem with the idea that animals be bred for genetic lines, and if someone wants to buy a particular breed, do it from a reputable breeder.
Personally, we rescue, so we support rescue adoptions. But my grandpa raised sheep and chickens to breed them for show, so I understand that purpose.
I do agree with Nat that you have to be careful about the wording, because I think it's irresponsible to give away rescues. Companion animals should not be free, period. Too risky for the animal without some type of commitment (IMO). Technically they need to be purchased, whether it's from a rescue or a shelter.
Originally Posted by LDG
I do agree with Nat that you have to be careful about the wording, because I think it's irresponsible to give away rescues. Companion animals should not be free, period. Too risky for the animal without some type of commitment (IMO). Technically they need to be purchased, whether it's from a rescue or a shelter.
We also have people importing stray cats from Estonia. We do have them in our shelters too, so I don't really get the point of importing strays when you have them here too.Originally Posted by Mimosa
BTW euthanasia rates here are much, much lower than in the States, people I know are even importing stray cats from Spain, Greece, Turkey, even Lebanon.
But I also have two purebred cats from a very responsible breeder, that was a conscious choice. My first two cats (Ernesto and Mimosa are farmcats) are gorgeous and very dear to me, but they have some behavioral issues that make their lives more complicated and I used to lie awake at night worrying they would die of HCM because they might very well be Ragdoll mixes and there were a lot of Ragdolls dropping dead of HCM back then.
are you on about breeds?Originally Posted by Primula
What do you think of people who pay for a cat or a dog? I must admit I highly disapprove because there are millions of cats and dogs who are homeless on the street or in shelters. Am I being judgmental?
No one will ever think you're a bad person!!! Never-everOriginally Posted by -_aj_-
and vito was bought from a farm, hes a border collie
the more i think about this topic it upsets me that some people might think im an awful person because i didnt go to a shelter for my cats, i bought them off a friend
I have seen people who paid thousands for a purebred animal treat the pet poorly and later dump it or try to sell the pet on craigslist, not a one time event either, and seen those who got free pets treat those pets like royalty for their whole life. It is the person who treats the pet right or wrong based on their moral value system, money oftentimes has little to do with it in a thoughtful caring person. That is why pre-screening is so so important in any type of rehoming situation.Originally Posted by jennyranson
I would never give a rescue kitten/stray cat away free to anyone I didn't know. a fee ( even a small one on top of the vaccination and neutering charges) makes people more responsible by putting a value on the animal.
I agree... I used to met people who spent upwards of 3000$ USD on a dog or cat and wanted to feed it the cheapest food and not go to the vet. The common reason was I just spent $$$$ on this animal. Where as the one found at the side of the road new pet parent would ask all kinds of ?s and spend what was needed( normally not a lot ). I did charge a small fee for the kittens I re homed mostly to get rid of the instant I want a kitty person and lessen the risk of the poor animals being used in the labs ...Originally Posted by cococat
I have seen people who paid thousands for a purebred animal treat the pet poorly and later dump it or try to sell the pet on craigslist, not a one time event either, and seen those who got free pets treat those pets like royalty for their whole life. It is the person who treats the pet right or wrong based on their moral value system, money oftentimes has little to do with it in a thoughtful caring person. That is why pre-screening is so so important in any type of rehoming situation.