School terror lesson to kill Australians
At one time in my life, I was a young teacher like this one (she's 23). You can pretty it up all you want as a "mistake" and "misguided" but seriously...what the heck was she thinking??? What was she trying to teach them? To be able to think from another's point of view?
Why not an assignment putting them in the place of the authorities, asking the students to create a plan to thwart a terrorist attack, taking into account their motivations.
Is there any redeemable quality to this assignment?
In the US the teacher would have been fired, especially after the stink that parents would have raised; and especially if there were multiple parents with ties to terrorist attacks (i.e. the 2002 Bali attack, as was mentioned in the article multiple times). Can the Aussies here explain why she isn't fired, and how the Principal gets away with defending her without being fired himself?
At one time in my life, I was a young teacher like this one (she's 23). You can pretty it up all you want as a "mistake" and "misguided" but seriously...what the heck was she thinking??? What was she trying to teach them? To be able to think from another's point of view?
Why not an assignment putting them in the place of the authorities, asking the students to create a plan to thwart a terrorist attack, taking into account their motivations.
Is there any redeemable quality to this assignment?
In the US the teacher would have been fired, especially after the stink that parents would have raised; and especially if there were multiple parents with ties to terrorist attacks (i.e. the 2002 Bali attack, as was mentioned in the article multiple times). Can the Aussies here explain why she isn't fired, and how the Principal gets away with defending her without being fired himself?











