Oh the Rearing of the FDA s ugly side and human raw foods

sharky

TCS Member
Thread starter
Veteran
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
27,231
Purraise
38
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...-heats-up.aspx

The FDA has long banned interstate sales of raw milk. Many states restrict or prohibit the sale of raw milk entirely.

Raw milk drinkers and sellers began fighting back in early 2010, filing suit against the FDA and claiming that banning interstate sales is unconstitutional. The case is now pending while the crackdowns continue.

Raw (unpasteurized) milk contains enzymes and bacteria have been shown to strengthen your immune system, develop healthy bacteria in your intestines and reduce the risks of everything from respiratory disease to obesity. Pasteurization destroys both good and bad bacteria.

The FDA officially banned interstate sales of raw milk in 1987, but it wasn't until 2006 that a crackdown began. Agricultural departments in several states, with the help of the FDA, started to stage raids of small dairies and buying clubs.

Daily Finance reports:

"On occasion, people do get sick from drinking raw milk. But the number of people sickened by raw milk compared to other foods does not seem to warrant the FDA's focused, expensive campaign ...

No government regulations of interstate commerce in peanuts, kale, or cantaloupes have been suggested, despite the much greater number of people sickened by consuming these foods. Sushi, a raw food that provides a greater opportunity for illness than raw milk, is legal in all 50 states, too."

Sources:
Daily Finance July 20, 2010


Dr. Mercola's Comments:
\t
Follow me on twitter Follow me on facebook

Millions of Americans get sick every year from eating contaminated foods. Among them, at least 325,000 will be hospitalized and 5,000 will die, according to FDA statistics.

Many foods are responsible for these illnesses. Most recently, romaine lettuce sold to wholesalers was recalled in multiple states after concerns of E. coli contamination, and a few weeks later romaine lettuce-based, ready-to-eat salads were recalled due to possible Salmonella bacteria.

Americans are no strangers to such recalls.

One of the most memorable occurred in 2006, when all spinach was pulled from store shelves. Alfalfa sprouts, tomatoes, beef and jalapeno peppers have also been recalled in recent years after serious illnesses have been reported.

Yet, only one food -- raw milk -- has been unfairly singled out and targeted by the FDA, the USDA and even the FBI as a "health risk" worthy of armed raids and crackdowns -- a food that also happens to be so low on the food-borne illness risk scale it's hardly measurable.

Why is Raw Milk Being Targeted?

According to CDC data, from 1993 to 2006 there were only about 116 illnesses a year linked to raw milk -- that amounts to less than .000002 percent of the 76 million people who contract a food-borne illness in the United States each year!

This is the reality of the "dangerous" food the FDA has launched an attack against -- seizing raw dairy products from private food coops, arresting small raw dairy farmers and threatening distributors with fines and jail time. They've also devoted an entire section of their web site to extolling the "dangers of unpasteurized milk."

Meanwhile, ground beef sold in supermarkets across the United States, with the FDA's gold seal of approval, commonly contains meat from hundreds of animals, often from different parts of the world.

The animals are not only raised in concentrated feedlots that are breeding grounds for dangerous bacteria and viruses, but they are fed an unnatural diet of grains, which creates a much higher level of acidity in the animal's stomach, which E. coli bacteria need to survive.

Despite this, there is no federal requirement for meat grinders to test their ingredients for E.coli prior to selling them. And most retailers do not test either. So not only is your meat being raised in ways that are known to encourage disease-causing organisms, but little to no testing is being done to make sure the meat is safe before it reaches your dinner plate -- and the FDA is A-OK with this.

It may also surprise you to learn that Chinese-raised fish, which are commonly sold in U.S. supermarkets, are often fed a diet of chicken waste and human waste, while toxic sewage sludge is used to fertilize many U.S. crops -- and again this is all within the realm of FDA regulations.

But raw milk -- a food that promotes the growth of healthy bacteria in your intestine, which in turn has a significant, beneficial impact on your overall immune function and health -- has been literally outlawed in many states.

Raw Milk Safety Standards Often Exceed Those of Pasteurized Milk

The dairy cows used to produce most of the pasteurized dairy sold in the United States are raised in similarly deplorable conditions, which is why the milk has to be pasteurized in order to make it safe for human consumption.

But high-quality raw dairy farmers march to an entirely different, and superior, drummer. California, specifically, (where raw milk is legal) has its own special set of standards for raw milk for human consumption, in which farmers must meet or exceed pasteurized milk standards, without pasteurizing.

The conventional dairy industry, realizing that increasing numbers of consumers are recognizing the health benefits of raw milk and going to great lengths to obtain it, has redoubled their efforts to make sure that raw milk sales are not able to grow, and certainly not able to become mainstream, where they could begin to threaten their very own livelihoods.

If raw dairy really caught on, you would think that the dairy industry would simply follow suit and begin producing raw products to meet the demand. But this would be virtually impossible with the way their overcrowded farms are run.

Their business depends on pasteurization, and that is why their powerful lobbyists will stop at nothing to persuade government agencies to keep raw milk bans in full force.

Unfortunately, as is often the case the FDA has jumped on the Big Business bandwagon and is doing everything in their power -- even arresting small farmers! -- to protect the interests of the Big Dairy industry.

The Raw Milk Revolution is Upon Us …

Right now the "war" between the FDA and consumers looking to secure their right to purchase and drink raw milk is reaching a peak.

Earlier this year, the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF) filed a lawsuit against the FDA over their raw milk ban, claiming it is unconstitutional. The FDA's rebuttal contained the following extremely concerning and outrageous statements, which make it very clear they believe you have no right to unprocessed food:

* "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food."
* "There is no 'deeply rooted' historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds."
* "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
* The FDA's brief goes on to state that "even if such a right did exist, it would not render the FDA's regulations unconstitutional because prohibiting the interstate sale and distribution of unpasteurized milk promotes bodily and physical health."
* "There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract."

If you go by these assertions, it means the FDA has the authority to prohibit any food of their choosing and make it a crime for you to seek it out. If, one day, the FDA deems tomatoes, broccoli or cashews capable of causing you harm (which is just as ludicrous as their assertions that raw milk is harmful), they could therefore enact such a ban and legally enforce it.

Get Informed and Protect Your Food Freedom

By joining the campaign to make access to healthy raw milk a right for all Americans, you are not only standing up for raw milk; you're taking a stand to protect your freedom of food choice.

For more information, I urge you to listen to my interview with Mark McAfee, the founder of Organic Pastures, one of the largest producers of raw milk in the United States, along with this video with health and business journalist David E. Gumpert.

You can also find lots of valuable information in Gumpert's book, The Raw Milk Revolution, and on www.OrganicPastures.com.

Finally, if you're interested in purchasing raw milk, RealMilk.com can help you find a high-quality source in your area.


Related Links:
Choosing Between Raw Milk and a Dead, White Liquid
The Despicable Reason Behind Raw Milk Bans
FDA Says You Have No Right to Real Food Unless They Give You Permission First


I know in my state the local health food stores have to label raw milk fertilizer or have huge warning labels... I personally cant drink it but it was far from a health hazard to my mom .... oh and non Usda meat has to be labeled pet food
 

c1atsite

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
May 22, 2002
Messages
3,175
Purraise
15
Location
new york city
Originally Posted by sharky

It may also surprise you to learn that Chinese-raised fish, which are commonly sold in U.S. supermarkets, are often fed a diet of chicken waste and human waste, while toxic sewage sludge is used to fertilize many U.S. crops -- and again this is all within the realm of FDA regulations.
That's so disgusting.
I saw a documentary mentioning "aguas negras" in Mexico - sewage sludge used to fertilize crops
 

mrblanche

TCS Member
Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
12,578
Purraise
119
Location
Texas
Just curious...have you ever heard of undulant fever? I have an uncle who nearly died from it. He got it from drinking raw milk from the cows on my grandfather's farm. No one knew the cow was sick; they'd been drinking her milk for years.

The FDA may be an irresponsible arm of the nanny state, but it HAS been very effective over the years. Yes, it occasionally misses problems, but our health in the U.S. has greatly increased under its usually watchful eye. Just as an example, no woman took thalidomide here in the U.S. legally. Diseases such as trichinosis, polio, cholera, and yes, brucellosis are virtually unknown or have been eradicated.

Raw milk was, for a long time, a source of infection in France, the home of Louis Pasteur, because they largely rejected pasteurization well into the 1980's.

And, just as a legal point, under the commerce clause, interstate sale of anything can be regulated.
 

whisky'sdad

TCS Member
Super Cat
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
1,058
Purraise
1
Location
Orange, CA
My sister does the whole foods and raw milk thing. They've been doing it for years! Not one has gotten sick or anything.
 

darlili

TCS Member
Top Cat
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
3,310
Purraise
14
Location
Illinois
Just curious - ever read about TB transmission and the reasons why pasteurization caught on?
 

milk maid

TCS Member
Alpha Cat
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
649
Purraise
11
Location
Gnomeville
As some of you know my OH and I are dairy farmers and I drink raw milk all the time. We have our cows tested every month for any problems or illness that they might have (this is something we pay for and it is not obligatory) I trust our milk. We are not alowed to sell to the general public, not because it is raw but because the milk companies that buy our milk do not allow farmers to do so. Saying that some farms are now starting to sell there raw milk at the supermarkets by installing refridgerated milk despensing units, aparently they are doing quite well. Raw cheese is also widely available in supermarkets and is by far (in my mind) superiour.
As sharky stated I think that a lot of other things should be looked into before they start thinking about raw milk.
 

laureen227

Darksome Duo!
Top Cat
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
19,260
Purraise
387
Location
Denton TX
Originally Posted by sharky

The FDA's rebuttal contained the following extremely concerning and outrageous statements, which make it very clear they believe you have no right to unprocessed food:

* "There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food."
* "There is no 'deeply rooted' historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds."
* "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
* The FDA's brief goes on to state that "even if such a right did exist, it would not render the FDA's regulations unconstitutional because prohibiting the interstate sale and distribution of unpasteurized milk promotes bodily and physical health."
* "There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract."
umm... have these people not read the Constitution? one of the basic human rights is listed as 'the pursuit of happiness', which fits all of the above!
i think the raw milk should be like other, 'not safe for everyone' things - just properly labeled. after all, hopefully most people know not to give children under 1 year of age honey, since it can be dangerous for them. that doesn't mean we ban honey - it means we educate consumers.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9

sharky

TCS Member
Thread starter
Veteran
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
27,231
Purraise
38
Originally Posted by laureen227

umm... have these people not read the Constitution? one of the basic human rights is listed as 'the pursuit of happiness', which fits all of the above!
i think the raw milk should be like other, 'not safe for everyone' things - just properly labeled. after all, hopefully most people know not to give children under 1 year of age honey, since it can be dangerous for them. that doesn't mean we ban honey - it means we educate consumers.
I agree ... Feel free to properly inform ... Ie if you have a compromised immune system you may want to avoid
 
Top