9-11/Pentagon - Page 2

Originally Posted by AmberThe Bobcat

Ok, listen up folks there were NO charges placed in the towers. The heat from the burning fuel weakened the superstructure. The weakened steel could no long support the floors above it and the building collapsed on itself. Now true, it does look as if this was a controlled demo, but it was not. When the tons of weight from above slammed down on the floors below, they could not support the weight and each floor pancaked down on itself. Much like if you take a soda can and stomp on it from above. How do I know this is NOT a controlled demo? Well for starters, you do not just walk into a building and place explosives in a few areas and have no one see the detonation cord leading to all the explosives. These explosives have to be placed in precise exact locations, in order to weaken the structure and have it collapse into itself. Second, a controlled demo does not start from the top of the building. They usually start at the bottom and work to the top. Why did the other building next to the twin towers collapse?? Very easy. When the towers fell, there was enough force and vibrations on the buildings next to them, causing enough damage on these buildings, that made them fall. The towers did not fall straight down either. In some videos, you can see the top falling to the side. The towers' debris also fell outward, like peeling the skin on a banana. This debris crashed into the adjacent buildings. There was millions and millions of tons of debris slamming into those adjacent buildings. Why wouldn't those buildings collapse as well?? I am no fan of the government, but there is no conspiracy here. 911 was a well planned terrorist attack.

Originally Posted by Skippymjp

One little snippet that's often over looked is, there are earth metals (magnesium) and alloys (aluminum) that will burn with, shall we say, gusto, when ignited. Even steel wool will burn. So will sugar and coffee creamer actually. Those towers were full of materials that will burn, but were considered safe because of the extreme temperatures it takes to ignite them.

Originally Posted by AmberThe Bobcat

Ok, listen up folks there were NO charges placed in the towers. The heat from the burning fuel weakened the superstructure. The weakened steel could no long support the floors above it and the building collapsed on itself. Now true, it does look as if this was a controlled demo, but it was not. When the tons of weight from above slammed down on the floors below, they could not support the weight and each floor pancaked down on itself. Much like if you take a soda can and stomp on it from above. How do I know this is NOT a controlled demo? Well for starters, you do not just walk into a building and place explosives in a few areas and have no one see the detonation cord leading to all the explosives. These explosives have to be placed in precise exact locations, in order to weaken the structure and have it collapse into itself. Second, a controlled demo does not start from the top of the building. They usually start at the bottom and work to the top. Why did the other building next to the twin towers collapse?? Very easy. When the towers fell, there was enough force and vibrations on the buildings next to them, causing enough damage on these buildings, that made them fall. The towers did not fall straight down either. In some videos, you can see the top falling to the side. The towers' debris also fell outward, like peeling the skin on a banana. This debris crashed into the adjacent buildings. There was millions and millions of tons of debris slamming into those adjacent buildings. Why wouldn't those buildings collapse as well?? I am no fan of the government, but there is no conspiracy here. 911 was a well planned terrorist attack.