I'll be honest. I've never seen her in a movie or anywhere else except the commercials for the idiotic drivel she somehow got the lead role in. But I do not like Kristin Stewart. It has always seemed to me that she would find it confounding to rub two sticks together. Maybe it's the sunken eyes, or the blankness in her stare. Or that she and her boyfriend look like they haven't bathed for weeks any time they appear in public. (Yeah, I admit it...I read TMZ and keep up with the gossip
But I am NOT obsessive about it. It's just something mindless to read to unwind for the day.)
But this one really takes the cake: She said that seeing the photos of herself in her day to day life is like seeing watching someone get raped.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...-rape-comment/
I get what she's saying. No one needs to spell it out for me. She feels violated by the press & paparazzi.
Still, no one put a gun to her head and made her try out for that role in Twilight. No one made her follow up by auditioning for the role of Joan Jett. No one held a knife to her throat and forced her into acting, or to Hollywood. She wanted to be an actress. Part of being successful, even for your 15 minutes (which I hope is all this Twilight craze lasts for!), is that you lose your own identity and privacy to the bloodsuckers in the press/paparazzi. She doesn't want her private life in the press, and she's done an admirable job of it considering who she's dating and all. But the paparazzi is part and parcel with the job, IMO.
There are at least 1,000 young aspiring actresses who would love to be in her position, press and all. Seriously - look at the "faux-celebrities" who want cameras in every part of their lives (reality
shows). And when the show is over, will do anything to stay in the limelight (i.e. Heidi Montag and her additiction to plastics, or the celeb-reality shows that bring them back from the celebrity grave for just one more taste of fame).
Comparing being successful to rape? This isn't like the older Hollywood stars who didn't know anything like this kind of intrusion until recently. She KNEW what she was walking into, and if she didn't then she's more of a moron than a chick who can't decide between loving a bat or a wolf.
But I am NOT obsessive about it. It's just something mindless to read to unwind for the day.)But this one really takes the cake: She said that seeing the photos of herself in her day to day life is like seeing watching someone get raped.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...-rape-comment/
I get what she's saying. No one needs to spell it out for me. She feels violated by the press & paparazzi.
Still, no one put a gun to her head and made her try out for that role in Twilight. No one made her follow up by auditioning for the role of Joan Jett. No one held a knife to her throat and forced her into acting, or to Hollywood. She wanted to be an actress. Part of being successful, even for your 15 minutes (which I hope is all this Twilight craze lasts for!), is that you lose your own identity and privacy to the bloodsuckers in the press/paparazzi. She doesn't want her private life in the press, and she's done an admirable job of it considering who she's dating and all. But the paparazzi is part and parcel with the job, IMO.
There are at least 1,000 young aspiring actresses who would love to be in her position, press and all. Seriously - look at the "faux-celebrities" who want cameras in every part of their lives (reality
shows). And when the show is over, will do anything to stay in the limelight (i.e. Heidi Montag and her additiction to plastics, or the celeb-reality shows that bring them back from the celebrity grave for just one more taste of fame).Comparing being successful to rape? This isn't like the older Hollywood stars who didn't know anything like this kind of intrusion until recently. She KNEW what she was walking into, and if she didn't then she's more of a moron than a chick who can't decide between loving a bat or a wolf.














I enjoy the books, I really do. But they're not literary pieces of art: they're fluff. That's WHY I enjoy them. I also enjoy reading books that have a lot more depth of character, as well as SOME classics. I'll pretty much read anything, but I don't always enjoy what I've read.


Her comment was definitely offensive..though I can see that she may not have meant for it to be offensive, it's so easy to exaggerate to make a point. I like to think she was just careless in what her words might imply.
