My friend is beside me and dictating as I type this. She is in a sticky situation and we would appreciate ANY help we can get.
Four months ago, she purchased a kitten from a breeder with a contract. Due to some circumstances that came up, she had no choice but to ask the breeder to take the kitten back. She couldn't keep him anymore. The breeder was unable to take the kitten back into his home, but gave her permission to look for a new home for the kitten. He said he would help too. The new owner would sign a new contract with the breeder.
My friend tried to screen as best she could based on replies to her ads and then emails to find this kitten a good home. There was a particularly good reply from someone in Toronto (she lives in Alberta). This person sounded like a very good home but didn't care for the papers as he would be a "pet only". Because of the distance and language barrier between the breeder and the interested buyer, the breeder didn't sign a new contract with the buyer.
The initial contract my friend had with the breeder states that the kitten must be neutered between the ages of 6-8 months. She laid out some of the points to follow for the buyer and the buyer agreed to all of them. These included sending a copy of the neuter certificate to the breeder, having the kitten neutered between 6-8 months, keeping him for life and not reselling him, etc. The buyer agreed to all these points via e-mail communication. The deal was that my friend would send the kitten to her and she would have those things done when the time was right.
I've taken some law classes and according to the law, email correspondence ARE contracts if there is an agreement made.
The problem is this... while browsing online, my friend found out that the buyer has kittens for sale! She used another email account and replied to the ad, pretending to be an interested buyer. Well, she got a lot of info from the buyer of her kitten. Turns out the buyer actually had many cats of her own and even a breeding pair (not registered, from byb) which produced this current litter.
She told my friend she only had ONE cat (two including the kitten). Turns out she has many more. She even said in her email response that she retired her old male and has new young male to use, but he is still too young. She is referring to my friend's kitten. In one week, the kitten will be 8 months old.
My friend has her real full name, address, phone number, and vet clinic information. She is distraught and does not want the kitten to be bred and contribute to the BYBs.
She is going to email the original breeder and inform him of all this. That lady has no idea we know all this. We have refrained from contacting her because we don't want her to know we know and mess up the whole situation before we come up with a plan. My friend is totally regretting not making the breeder sign a contract with the buyer but as I told her, email correspondences count as contracts if there was an agreement, just that it'd be harder to enforce.
What steps do you recommend we take at this point? Thanks !!
Four months ago, she purchased a kitten from a breeder with a contract. Due to some circumstances that came up, she had no choice but to ask the breeder to take the kitten back. She couldn't keep him anymore. The breeder was unable to take the kitten back into his home, but gave her permission to look for a new home for the kitten. He said he would help too. The new owner would sign a new contract with the breeder.
My friend tried to screen as best she could based on replies to her ads and then emails to find this kitten a good home. There was a particularly good reply from someone in Toronto (she lives in Alberta). This person sounded like a very good home but didn't care for the papers as he would be a "pet only". Because of the distance and language barrier between the breeder and the interested buyer, the breeder didn't sign a new contract with the buyer.
The initial contract my friend had with the breeder states that the kitten must be neutered between the ages of 6-8 months. She laid out some of the points to follow for the buyer and the buyer agreed to all of them. These included sending a copy of the neuter certificate to the breeder, having the kitten neutered between 6-8 months, keeping him for life and not reselling him, etc. The buyer agreed to all these points via e-mail communication. The deal was that my friend would send the kitten to her and she would have those things done when the time was right.
I've taken some law classes and according to the law, email correspondence ARE contracts if there is an agreement made.
The problem is this... while browsing online, my friend found out that the buyer has kittens for sale! She used another email account and replied to the ad, pretending to be an interested buyer. Well, she got a lot of info from the buyer of her kitten. Turns out the buyer actually had many cats of her own and even a breeding pair (not registered, from byb) which produced this current litter.
She told my friend she only had ONE cat (two including the kitten). Turns out she has many more. She even said in her email response that she retired her old male and has new young male to use, but he is still too young. She is referring to my friend's kitten. In one week, the kitten will be 8 months old.
My friend has her real full name, address, phone number, and vet clinic information. She is distraught and does not want the kitten to be bred and contribute to the BYBs.
She is going to email the original breeder and inform him of all this. That lady has no idea we know all this. We have refrained from contacting her because we don't want her to know we know and mess up the whole situation before we come up with a plan. My friend is totally regretting not making the breeder sign a contract with the buyer but as I told her, email correspondences count as contracts if there was an agreement, just that it'd be harder to enforce.
What steps do you recommend we take at this point? Thanks !!













But I do understand that there is a language barrier involved, and laws differ between international jurisdictions.