This article in last Sunday's Boston Globe made a lot of sense to me. The US has an atrociously high number of people in prison. What I found startling though was the similarity between recommendations for training people and training animals. Namely, if you're going to use an aversive, the punishment has to happen at almost the same time as the improper behavior occurred.
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/id...d_sure/?page=1
Swift and sure
A new tool for fighting crime: Get serious about probation
Quote:
| Over the last 35 years, the US criminal justice system has been spectacularly bad at answering this question. America is the most punitive nation in the world, with 2.4 million of its citizens behind bars and another 5.1 million on probation or parole. Yet according to the latest national statistics, two-thirds of released prisoners commit another serious offense within three years. After a generation of draconian crime policy, America’s crime rates are still among the highest in the Western world. Instead of one costly problem, we now have two: crime and mass incarceration. ... In Beccaria’s day, most punishment was corporal and could be doled out immediately. In the modern American system, where the primary mode of punishment is imprisonment after a trial, swiftness and certainty are harder to achieve. Juries take time to assemble, legal appeals can take years, and the sheer size of the system dwarfs anything Beccaria could have imagined. The result is more humane in many ways, but it does not reflect the consensus among psychologists. “Most criminal justice is kind of like a parent saying to their kid, ‘If you don’t clean your room today, there’s a 50 percent chance that a year from now I’m going to ground you for 10 years,’ ” says Humphreys. “And the way of course you get your kid to do stuff is you say, ‘If you don’t clean your room now, you will not get to that movie tonight, and tomorrow will be a new day.’ ” |
Swift and sure
A new tool for fighting crime: Get serious about probation














