Not that I'm a fan of either one of these businesses for various reasons, but I found it interesting that the fresh local produce that Wal-Mart sells is not only cheaper, but in some cases tastes better than what Whole Foods sells.
There is an article in this month's Atlantic by someone who purchased identical ingredients at both stores (the bill was something like $126 at W-M and $175 at WF) and had chefs prepare high class dishes, subjecting the groceries to a taste test. The Wal-Mart produce was able to hold its own.
Not only that, there is an element of corporate responsiblity that I for one do not associate with Wally World.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...mackdown/7904/
There is an article in this month's Atlantic by someone who purchased identical ingredients at both stores (the bill was something like $126 at W-M and $175 at WF) and had chefs prepare high class dishes, subjecting the groceries to a taste test. The Wal-Mart produce was able to hold its own.
Not only that, there is an element of corporate responsiblity that I for one do not associate with Wally World.
Quote:
| Walmart says it wants to revive local economies and communities that lost out when agriculture became centralized in large states. (The heirloom varieties beloved by foodies lost out at the same time, but so far they’re not a focus of Walmart’s program.) This would be something like bringing the once-flourishing silk and wool trades back to my hometown of Rockville, Connecticut. It’s not something you expect from Walmart, which is better known for destroying local economies than for rebuilding them. |









)

We have our own small chains of grocery stores here, and honestly a lot of their produce is terrible. If I want fresh spinach I have to wait and get it at walmart when we're in that town. When we can afford the time and money to travel further we prefer Sam's club produce. The taste and freshness is even better, plus they carry some odder stuff.







