TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Quality of food bank donations
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Quality of food bank donations

post #1 of 20
Thread Starter 
Please do not turn this into a thread about where to donate / whether to donate at all I was wondering what you thought about the quality of food that should be donated to food bank type charities

Last night on my way home, I stopped by the grocery store to pick up some essentials, they have their food drive on - you can donate cash when you pay, put items into a bin the fire dept leave there or they have $5, $10 and $20 ready made bags on a display you can pick up and put in the bin. The bags. This particular store have a few versions of their own brands, a company that makes food for them (higher end products) then the store brand and a white label / no name / no frills brand

The ready made donation bags were made up of these white label products in large brown paper bags, one of the bags was ripped and someone from work (not quite a coworker, she works for someone else in the same building but I say hi in the halls etc) was shopping at the same time and I seen her looking in the bag. She asked me if I was buying one and I explained that we usually donate right to a charity as their buying power is better than stores with their profits on top (and they generally dont put extras in the bag because customers would buy them for their own use).

She was donating but went around the store to buy the products but was looking in the bag to see what was in it because she wanted to buy the same stuff because obviously that was what they needed (it was spaghetti, pasta sauce, canned meats and veggies etc) because there is no way she would demean someone by making them eat the white label brand.

She completely disagreed with me that some of the white label brand is just as good with less designed packaging (I buy some of the white label products myself because I prefer them), and I am of the mind that I could spend $17 on the stuff for one family she bought or three of their bags of the same products for $15 or the $20 bag for a family that included cereal etc and could feed them for longer than 2 nights - as far as I am concerned, these people (for the most part at least, there will always be people who take advantage) are in need of help and therefore whatever helps them most (ie feeding them longer / feeding more people) for what I can afford is more important than the look of the packaging - as long as the food is in date / safe for consumption etc.
post #2 of 20
I agree with you.
post #3 of 20
I'm with you. With the except of meats or some dairy productions, I usually by the store or generic brand. I mean, green beans are green beans! I can't tell the difference. I agree it would be better for the families to get more for the same amount and I'm sure they appreciate it.

I volunteer (when time allows) at my church's food bank and what I hate is when people bring in expired food. Now, I know canned food can last longer than the expiration date but it's the principle of the thing. If you are afraid to eat it, why give it to someone that has nothing else? (I'm talking about yrs over the expiration date, not just a few months.)
post #4 of 20
There aren't THAT many food processors/canners in the country.

As an example, if you buy spinach, no matter what brand, you can bet it was canned by Allen Canners of northwest Arkansas. I've picked up other foods there, too, and you can watch 10 different brands coming off the processing line, including high-end and white-label generics. We would pick up the vegetables there and take them to the grocery warehouse. But when those vegetables came into the plant, they were all the same. They were the same when they were processed. Same when they were canned. The only difference is the label.


The only thing I would worry about would be canners in Mexico; their quality might be more to worry about.

But if I eat generic brands, and I could afford the premium brands, why should someone getting it for free not eat the generic brands?
post #5 of 20
Thread Starter 
It wasnt even the regular brands like Prego sauce, she was bought her fave sauce at $5 for a jar and whole wheat sundried tomato pasta. I am standing there looking at the big bulk pack of spaghetti for $1.69 and her tiny package at $3 shaking my head

I too hate when people bring out of date food, they do it at the animal shelters too - if its not too out of date we allow people to use it for ferals but other than that we throw it too
post #6 of 20
I can honestly say that I haven't purchased the black & white label stuff since it first came out some 25 years ago....and back then, the quality was pretty poor. I do, however, purchase store brands of just about everything else. I've found the store brands to be as good, and sometimes even better, than name brands. Paper products, such as tissue and toilet paper often come in larger sizes in store brands. When I purchase for food drives, etc., I love to get as much 'bang for my buck' as possible, so I go for the store brands. I am happy that I'm able to give quality (things that I've tried and liked) as well as quantity (I can afford to give more, because the price is better, and often there are great sales for store brands.)
post #7 of 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by icklemiss21 View Post
It wasnt even the regular brands like Prego sauce, she was bought her fave sauce at $5 for a jar and whole wheat sundried tomato pasta. I am standing there looking at the big bulk pack of spaghetti for $1.69 and her tiny package at $3 shaking my head
Some people simply do not know how to shop to save money. Personally, I think if people want to get as to donate as possible they should be using coupons, too.

I wouldn't donate any brand that I wouldn't eat myself and there's only a few things I care about brand for - the deciding factor is always what's on sale.
post #8 of 20
There are certain brands of some foods that I prefer over generic brands and buy for myself but that is a personal choice. If someone wishes to spend more money on items they are donating to charity, I don't see a problem with that. I would be more concerned about someone who spends money on expensive items for themselves and never give a thought to giving something back to charity. After all, giving should be from the heart and apparently her heart is in the right place, i.e., she only donates what she herself would eat.
post #9 of 20
Thread Starter 
I agree that she can buy what she wants for them, but she actually said it was demeaning to purchase the generic brands because they are getting it from a food bank. I do not find it demeaning as much as supplying what you can as a food bank
post #10 of 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by icklemiss21 View Post
I agree that she can buy what she wants for them, but she actually said it was demeaning to purchase the generic brands because they are getting it from a food bank. I do not find it demeaning as much as supplying what you can as a food bank
Oh I definitely agree with you. To say it is demeaning is rather ignorant of her IMO.
post #11 of 20
I am brand loyal in some things for our own use, where I'd buy the generic for the Food Bank. That's simply a case of equal quality, but personal preference in terms of flavour or appearance or whatever. We can afford to spend more on those things for our own consumption, but if it were a case of spreading the buck as far as it will go, I wouldn't hesitate to buy the generic for us. So why shouldn't I get the biggest bang for my charity buck, when it's not compromising the quality.

As for it being "demeaning" to receive the generic product from the Food Bank -- what does that woman think going to the Food Bank must feel like in the first place?? A day at the beach? I'm sure the people in those lines are focused on getting FOOD, not gourmet food.
post #12 of 20
Thinking about it more. Maybe she just feels she has to give them the best because she feels that they may not get to have those things? An odd sort of self sacrificing behavior that I suppose can be admired if this is the case.
post #13 of 20
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by strange_wings View Post
Thinking about it more. Maybe she just feels she has to give them the best because she feels that they may not get to have those things? An odd sort of self sacrificing behavior that I suppose can be admired if this is the case.
Maybe

Having volunteered there, I know they need all the donations they can get, even in a relatively affluent city - I would hate to think of them turning away people because people bought higher end food but less food
post #14 of 20
Surely they won't? Anything is better than nothing.
I wonder if they could get any big box stores in the area to help? (just a thought I'm pondering)

Oh, and a little O/T but hopefully people donate plenty of canned tomatoes and tomato sauce? Cheaper than pasta or pizza sauce (without the added sugar or HFCS) and one of those things that you can make a lot of cheap meals from.
post #15 of 20
Thread Starter 
They do usually have canned tomatoes etc, the $5 bags the store organised just happened to have pasta sauce that was on sale - more bang for the buck. I think it just encouraged people to donate, its easy to think 'oh I will grab one of those for charity' than people thinking about what to buy.

The foodbank does have monetary donations and buys things in bulk, but if everyone who donates food buys less with their money - I know not everyone would but even a portion of donors doing it could make a difference (and a large portion of the brown bags they send in the community newspaper come back with outdated food they can not give out also) it could make a difference to the numbers they could help.

I dont think a lot of people/businesses realise that we have people who need to use the foodbank here. Compared to the areas around us, the area is fairly affluent. So I find stores help the next city (it borders us so is just as close to many stores) which is bigger and has a huge homeless population compared to here and therefore more charities and more pulling power for corporate donors.
post #16 of 20
I can kind of see what the person could have been thinking: for people in generational poverty, there's sometimes a tendency to spend money on nonessentials to "prove they're not trash" or something. My mom was this way for a long time and complained about the grocery store even having store brands of everything. Same reason some ghetto kids always have new Nikes. The thinking is that their family is all they have, so they want the best material things they can get for their family...and if someone's been on welfare for three generations, they're probably not going to be thinking about someone else had to pay for it anyway.

I know that the store brands, 85% of the time, are just as good or better, and I don't think that insisting on brand name everything is a productive outlook on food shopping, but I can see how some people could get hung up on it.
post #17 of 20
I buy a lot of store brand items myself- especially Kroger and Target brands. I don't think its demeaning. It saves me quite a bit of money! I suppose if your friend is doing the buying, let her donate the $3 box of pasta! At least she's donating. I figure if the store brand items are good enough for me, they are good enough for anyone else. I'm sure some store brands are better than others, but for the most part I don't see a huge difference.
post #18 of 20
I don't give special treats or name brands to food banks, you want to know why? Because I've done some volunteer work in certain shall remain nameless food bank programs, and the "good stuff" that is donated is stolen by the workers.

I'm not saying they are all that way but I've seen enough to make me jaded and cynical as far as food banks (and clothing donations too)
post #19 of 20
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by otto View Post
I don't give special treats or name brands to food banks, you want to know why? Because I've done some volunteer work in certain shall remain nameless food bank programs, and the "good stuff" that is donated is stolen by the workers.

I'm not saying they are all that way but I've seen enough to make me jaded and cynical as far as food banks (and clothing donations too)
Wow, I have never experienced that, I have volunteered in sorting before and I know we have joked on occasion that people eat better than we do but I have never seen anything go missing. Last year a local man (who is very generous to a lot of the charities here) bought chocolate bunnies for children at Easter. The person in charge said volunteers could eat the ones that were broken and no one took them as they knew the amount was limited.

Ours is set up as a store, the people come in and sit with the person in charge, a list of what they are allowed is then printed and a volunteer takes them through the store making sure they take only what has been approved. I have seen the people argue for different stuff (one I had was allowed 500g of pasta, wanted this other brand that had less (lets say 350g) but complained she did not get the full 500g. So I have seen it cause issues on occasion, but for the most part, people are just happy to have enough to feed their families.

One of the reasons I prefer to give them money to buy in bulk - they buy packets that come in the sizes they print on the lists and everyone gets the same
post #20 of 20
A lot of the time the reason for the price difference between a store brand and the "name" brand is the price of advertising and a pretty label , the stuff inside is exactly the same. Like Mike, said, the store brands and name brands are usually packaged at the same facility too.

I buy generics 9 out 10 times About the only thing I am brand loyal to is Dawn dish washing detergent and Uncle Ben's rice
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Quality of food bank donations