TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Can somebody just take him out already?!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Can somebody just take him out already?!

post #1 of 41
Thread Starter 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle7023684.ece

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is IMO the biggest threat to the U.S., Israel, the UK, etc. Maybe I'm going overboard here, but I think he needs to be taken out. Now he's declaring Iran as a nuclear state and going beyond the previous enrichment levels with uranium and further brutalizing the opposition movement with violence. Once again he's severed media coverage, cell phone usage, etc. to make it almost impossible for people outside of Iran to know what he's doing to the protesters.

Yeah, the CIA messed up big time with Iraq. I admit that. This time though, it doesn't even matter what the CIA has on him. He's gone public about his nefarious intentions both verbally and through his actions.

I'm so mad that I almost want to volunteer myself. Give me a Springfield XDm full size in 9mm with a threaded barrel, a Gemtech Tundra suppressor, a Barrett model 98B in .338 Lapua Magnum with the 20" barrel and an Advanced Armament Titan-QD suppressor for it, a few extra magazines, and some good ammo and I'll give it a try.

No, I'm not serious about me trying to take him out myself (I'm not a crazy idiot afterall), but I was only half joking, because I think that a military unit SHOULD and I don't care what country deploys them

If Iran wants another dictator after that, whatever, I'm not advocating we impose democracy on them. I'm just saying that this one guy is pure evil and if something isn't done, before we know it, something horrible is going to happen.
post #2 of 41
Thread Starter 
Sorry. My temper flared there for a moment. I had a moment to calm down after reading the article again. I'll leave what I posted nonetheless. I could have made my point in a less heated and more intelligent manner. I apologize for that.

All I'm saying is that I'm extremely disturbed by the current events in Iran, what its "leader" (I know that he's in some ways he's a puppet and not really the head guy) has said, and I am concerned about what the future holds.
post #3 of 41
The best we can do is hope the people over there overthrow him. I think we should be supporting the disidents.

Seeing all the riots after the "election" made me think there may be some hope. I can understand your frustration. I trust a nuke in the hands of the Chineese more than I do in his hands.

All I hear of from our president is "sanctions". Gee how has that worked so far? But, actually, more sanctions will make the people more angry and perhaps move them to do something. Lets hope.
post #4 of 41
It will be left to the tiny, but powerful and righteous, country of Israel to eradicate this problem. I'm surprised they haven't already.

The current leaders of the United States and U.K. don't have what it takes, they are no friend to Israel, IMO.

Iran can posture all it wants, Iran will never destroy Israel.
post #5 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
[COLOR="NavyThe current leaders of the United States and U.K. don't have what it takes, they are no friend to Israel, IMO.[/b][/color]
Neither did past leaders who let it get as far along as it has. Sanctions are ridiculous, they never work, and won't work this time either. I said all along we were over there screwing around in Iraq, when Iran is clearly the bigger threat.
post #6 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misty8723 View Post
Neither did past leaders who let it get as far along as it has. Sanctions are ridiculous, they never work, and won't work this time either. I said all along we were over there screwing around in Iraq, when Iran is clearly the bigger threat.
There were sanctions against Iraq also, they did not work either.
post #7 of 41
Thread Starter 
I think one of the things that makes my blood boil when it comes to him is his statements about the Holocaust.

My aunt's father (not related to me by blood) and her mother (also not related to me by blood) both are/were survivoris of the Holocaust. I say "were" because her mother passed away recently. Her father, survived Auschwitz. He was a kid at the time, not even a teenager, and he watched his parents killed execution style by a single bullet shot to the head at point blank range. They were killed because they were not physically fit enough to perform the tasks the Nazis were demanding, using them as slave laborers. He still has the tattoo from Auschwitz with his number. It's faded over the years obviously, but it's still there. He shows it to me whenever I see him at Passover or Rosh Hashanah and reminds me to never forget. I won't, but I feel that many Jews have, particularly in my generation (obviously I don't mean "forget" in the traditional sense as though I'm talking of a memory b/c we're obviously too young to have been in the Holocaust, I mean it in the sense of being knowledgable about what happened, and keeping in mind that it wasn't that long ago.

Anyways, his comments regarding Jews and the Holocaust upset me tremendously. I also see some parallels between him and his group of supporters such as the Revolutionary Guards and others who only seem to know, and admire - violence - and the early beginnings of Nazism both in Germany, and in the United States with the American Nazi Party (which still exists and maintains their own website).

I tend to agree with the comments above that the US and UK don't have the stones to do what needs to be done. Israel on the other hand, has stones made of hardened carbon steel. I can see Israel taking this into their hands.

Iran will never destroy Israel? I'm not sure how you mean that. Do you mean that should Iran attempt to destroy Israel... they will lose? Or are you saying that Iran is all bark and no bite? I tend to think that Iran absolutely intends to attack Israel at some point, but that Israel will prevail, hopefully with the help of its allies, but at this point I have questions as to whether the US is still one of them.
post #8 of 41
No LawGuy, what I mean is, Israel will receive divine help, regardless of whether the U.S. and the U.K. are to chicken hearted to help. And that is really all Israel needs.

Thank you for sharing that story about your Aunt's father. I agree with him. That would be a very emotional feeling to see the faded, inked, concentration camp numbers on a Holocaust survivor's wrist. I have never been so fortunate.

My story is a bit different. I was visiting a boyfriend's parents in Tucson, Arizona and their neighbor was there. The neighbor was an old German who was very outspoken about the fact that the Holocaust "never happened, it was just phony, a HOllywood fabrication."

I wanted to smack that sucker. My father fought in WWII, in Italy, liberating Rome. I was so upset I couldn't see straight. I wouldn't let anyone in MY house that said such things.

That is, exactly, why General Eisenhower brought the German populace, along with American news people to film the atrocity, the mountains of dead people piled like cord wood, the ovens used to gas millions. That why thousands were shown because General Eisenhower said that people wouldn't believe. I guess he was right.

And now, 65 years later, many people are turning against Israel again and the persecution of the Jews never really stopped
post #9 of 41
Thread Starter 
Oh geez. I've really messed up. Here I am essentially accusing Iran's theocratic goverment, and more specifically Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of working towards building a nuclear weapon for the purposes of trying to destroy Israel and/or the US or others, and violently oppressing those rebelling against the road that their country is going down, and then the truth comes out.

Ahmadinejad stated today that as he has said multiple times before, their uranium enrichment is for peaceful purposes such as nuclear power plants. I guess I just assumed his intent was malicious because Iran has the 3rd largest oil reserve in the world. You know the old expression about assumptions.... well, it turns out he's going green. It's part of an environmental movement to battle global warming. Here I was thinking that he was evil, but it turns out that he's just your average tye-die shirt, worn-down jeans, and birkenstocks wearing environmentalist.

Let's all give him a round of applause for his contribution to preserving the environment.

Give me a break.
post #10 of 41
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
No LawGuy, what I mean is, Israel will receive divine help, regardless of whether the U.S. and the U.K. are to chicken hearted to help. And that is really all Israel needs.

Thank you for sharing that story about your Aunt's father. I agree with him. That would be a very emotional feeling to see the faded, inked, concentration camp numbers on a Holocaust survivor's wrist. I have never been so fortunate.

My story is a bit different. I was visiting a boyfriend's parents in Tucson, Arizona and their neighbor was there. The neighbor was an old German who was very outspoken about the fact that the Holocaust "never happened, it was just phony, a HOllywood fabrication."

I wanted to smack that sucker. My father fought in WWII, in Italy, liberating Rome. I was so upset I couldn't see straight. I wouldn't let anyone in MY house that said such things.

That is, exactly, why General Eisenhower brought the German populace, along with American news people to film the atrocity, the mountains of dead people piled like cord wood, the ovens used to gas millions. That why thousands were shown because General Eisenhower said that people wouldn't believe. I guess he was right.

And now, 65 years later, many people are turning against Israel again and the persecution of the Jews never really stopped
The first time I saw the tattoo and he told me the story (there's a lot more - and some of it might be in Spielberg's Holocaust Project documentary b/c he was one of the people interviewed) - I got very emotional. I was torn between feelings of extreme sadness and feeling furious. I too have dealt in person with people who deny that it happened. I've learned to just walk away, because otherwise I worry that I might get so angry that I'd do something that I would regret later, and that would make me no better than them.

I can't agree more with your last comment:

Quote:
And now, 65 years later, many people are turning against Israel again and the persecution of the Jews never really stopped
I don't know why this is the case, but I agree that it's true. What's more concerning is how many Jewish individuals seem to be oblivious that there is still a massive amount of anti-semitism out there. They seem to think that it's all over. They haven't been asked, "Where's your horns?" I have. All one needs to do is use Google to find massive numbers of websites and forums dedicated to anti-semitism and promoting "finishing what Hitler started". We even saw it with 9/11. There was a rumor going around that it was a Jewish conspiracy to provoke the US government into attacking Muslims. Plenty of people to this day still believe that. There are websites dedicated to discussions of Jewish conspiracies that essentially blames the Jews for just about every bad thing that has ever happened in the world.

I don't know if it will ever end. When some people found out that I was Jewish and saw my holiday light display (it was huge), they got angry and claimed that I was "stealing their holiday". I just like lights.

I'll end my rant with this. The lady who we originally got our auto-insurance through turned out to be anti-semitic. How did we find out? It wasn't hard. She just wasn't very bright. After a slightly heated discussion about an issue between my father and her, at the end as she was hanging up, she must have accidentally hit the speakerphone button or something, because the last thing my father heard was her say (assuming that the phone was hung up) "Effin Jews" (I've substituted the word Effin for the real word she used.
post #11 of 41
The funny thing is that the Iranian people are SO pro-American.

Amadinajad is, almost certainly, one of the sadistic guys who most mistreated the American hostages from the US embassy.

Knowing that, I wouldn't give much for his chances any time he leaves Iran. He's well guarded, but the CIA has a long memory and very dedicated employees.
post #12 of 41
Don't expect Obama to do a darn thing about him! He thinks we should just be nice and sit down with him and talk..............lmao

We are in for another 9/11 - but worse this time with the current administration!
post #13 of 41
It is not just Ahmadinejad who is anti semitic, it appears to be that a big part of the muslim world is...

I had a friend I knew from high school who was from Afghanistan, and he told me that he had trouble accepting the fact that one of our teachers was jewish. He said that he had been taught in his country that in order to be a good muslim one should never respect a jew. He was confused and didn't know what to do because he had also been taught to respect teachers...
After rationalizing it with his dad he came to accept it somehow, I don't know what the rationalization was, but eventually he even became a really close friend with my boyfriend, who is jewish..
However, when my boyfriend and I went to his house he told us "if religion comes up don't tell my parents that Josh is jewish"..
Now that I look back I wonder, what were we thinking going in that house lol..
I was soo shocked at how serious the whole thing was. It really freaked me out.
Especially the fact that this friend of mine was so scared of breaking the rules of Islam, like something as simple as respecting our teacher provoked such guilt and fear in him.

I hope I don't offend anyone but this is just my experience. I've also had some friends who are Muslim who deny anything like this. But they tend to be really secular, they say they are muslim but never go to mosque, eat pork and drink alcohol. I couldn't believe at first that a religion could have such rules..so I looked up some passages from the Koran in regards to jews..and sure enough some of them do sound negative when they talk about jews:

"They [the Children of Israel] were consigned to humiliation and wretchedness. They brought the wrath of God upon themselves, and this because they used to deny God's signs and kill His Prophets unjustly and because they disobeyed and were transgressors" (Sura 2:61)

"Koran 5:51
Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers. "


Although like with any religion, the ones who believe in literal interpretation of scripture are generally fundamentalists who should be feared. So looking at these passages doesn't prove much, I am sure I can find equally infuriating passages from the Torah on homosexuality and how it's considered the greatest abomination. (I am pretty sure I saw that once)..And yet the majority of jews I know are very tolerant of homosexuals.

Anyway, I think this post justifies even more my choice to stay as far away from any religions as I can.
post #14 of 41
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Anyway, I think this post justifies even more my choice to stay as far away from any religions as I can.
I've heard that more wars have been fought over religious issues than anything else. I don't know if that's really true, but if so it's so sad.

Your story is interesting. I have met some Muslims who were anti-semitic, but I wouldn't say that all are, especially here in the U.S. I've known a fair number who were in complete agreement that what is going on in the middle-east is nothing short of insane. Here in the U.S., while I'm concerned about the radical muslims who are waiting or plotting to attack like the young men responsible for the UK underground bombing, I'm more concerned about the regrowth we're seeing of neo-nazi white supremacists. Again, I refer you to the internet to find some of the white-supremacist forums I've found. They make members show their family tree to become a member to make sure there is not a drop of any "impure" blood in them! Insanity. The KKK has their own website with their own TV channel webcast. These things concern me deeply. Between the radical Muslims within the US and elsewhere, and this resurgence in the white-supremacist movement, things are going to get a lot worse before they get better IMO.
post #15 of 41
Ut0pia, a sad fact of life is this, many religions don't have anything to do with God.

YOu don't have to be a member of organzied religion to be a Christian.
post #16 of 41
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post


YOu don't have to be a member of organzied religion to be a Christian.
Or a Jew or a Muslim etc, but otherwise well said.
post #17 of 41
I have said it over and over, the Jews are the Chosen people of God, the Children of Israel. Jesus was a Jew, now all you have to do is take one more step and believe he is the Son of God and Saviour of the World. We have a Jewish couple that are members of my church.
post #18 of 41
Thread Starter 
Well, with all due respect, without going into whether or not I believe that Jesus was the son of G-d or not, I'd just like to say that going down the road of attempting to convert me (if that's what you were thinking of doing) probably isn't going to end well. We both believe in the same G-d, I think on the forum we should be content to leave it at that. You are entitled to your personal belief system, and I am entitled to mine and that's part of what makes the U.S.A. great.
post #19 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by LawGuy View Post
Well, with all due respect, without going into whether or not I believe that Jesus was the son of G-d or not, I'd just like to say that going down the road of attempting to convert me (if that's what you were thinking of doing) probably isn't going to end well. We both believe in the same G-d, I think on the forum we should be content to leave it at that. You are entitled to your personal belief system, and I am entitled to mine and that's part of what makes the U.S.A. great.
You are very diplomatic, no worries. Yes, it sure is what makes the USA great.
post #20 of 41
The problem is that there isn't an easy solution in Iran. We can't just drop a couple of bombs and be done with it. If it were that easy, either President Bush or the Israelis would have done it some time ago. It was done once before and the Iranians learned to divide their one big facility up into a number of smaller, redundant, and hardened locations along with numerous decoys.

In order to be even moderately successful at crippling their nuclear capabilities, we'd have to launch a large-scale bombing campaign. The level of success would be directly related to the quality of our intelligence regarding the sites, which probably isn't very good. If we just start bombing everything that looks suspicious, we end up hitting houses, schools, mosques, hospitals, and we start turning otherwise moderate Iranians into jihadists bent on the destruction of western civilization.

There's also the practical aspect of it. Israel already has nuclear weapons. If Iran were to launch a warhead towards Israel, they'd see 20 coming back in the other direction. Ahmadinejad, for all his saber rattling, surely knows this. He can bluff all he wants, but unless he's totally insane he can't go all in because he knows that he'll lose.
post #21 of 41
Thread Starter 
Oh, don't misunderstand me - I'm not advocating that we nuke Iran. There are good people there too. All I'm talking about is strategically eliminating certain key individuals who seem to be turning into more and more of a threat to the US, Israel, the UK, etc. every day. I would imagine this would involve small copper-coated lead objects moving at a high rate of speed, deployed by a professional whose job title rhymes with diaper, using a weapon made by a company with a name that rhymes with ferret.

I disagree that Ahmadinejad would care if 20 nukes came back after him firing just one. That's the aspect of this war against extremism that is most difficult. The extremists don't care if they are killed, so long as they take out as many of their "enemies" in the process.
post #22 of 41
I believe a reminder of the rules is called for here:
PLEASE READ: Inflammatory language in posts
post #23 of 41
Thread Starter 
I see. Thank you for the link jcat. In my first post, the vigilante thing wasn't meant to be taken seriously, that's why I said so afterwards and clarified that I'm talking about a military matter here.

We're not talking about doing anything illegal, this is simply a discussion regarding whether the US military or another country's military should take action to elimate certain members of the Iranian government in an effort to reduce the threat that exists and seems to be growing.

Does that still fall under what you linked to? I was under the impression that it was intended to prevent discussions of personally committing acts of violence against individuals. I felt that while my initial post was written while I was angry after reading the most recent news about Iran, that it still was relatively benign and civil.

Maybe I'm wrong and I violated the rules. If so, I apologize. I did not mean to offend anybody.
post #24 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by LawGuy View Post

We're not talking about doing anything illegal, this is simply a discussion regarding whether the US military or another country's military should take action to elimate certain members of the Iranian government in an effort to reduce the threat that exists and seems to be growing.
We have no business eliminating another country's legitimate leader. In the eyes of international law, he is a legitimate leader of a sovereign nation, no matter what we think.

Just trying to be objective here.

I am not saying I like the guy obviously, I know he's a threat to the US, but come on, we can't just do something like assassinate another country's ruler for goodness sake!

At least not publicly, and I highly doubt the CIA hasn't already had covert operations trying to "take him out"..they did with Castro 700 times (not so conspicuous either)

Although from what I understood of your thread at first was that you weren't saying "we need to do this" but rather "I wish we could do this"...I guess I misunderstood!
post #25 of 41
Thread Starter 
Let me start this thread by warning that it will describe some graphic historical events. If you are squeemish, stop reading now.

Quote:
Although from what I understood of your thread at first was that you weren't saying "we need to do this" but rather "I wish we could do this"...I guess I misunderstood!
Actually, my original intent was more along the lines of "I think the government should very seriously consider doing this."

As for the rest of your post, I understand what you're saying, and typically I would agree, however there are (in my mind) some exceptions. To illustrate them, and I hate to unfortunately make this thread a victim of Godwin's law, I propose the following hypothetical.

Let's say, back in 1919 a relatively young 30 year old foreign intelligence officer and spy infiltrates a small political group. It only consists of a few members, but the officer is so taken with the group that instead of reporting back to military intelligence commanders, he joins the group, becoming their seventh member. They were so impressed with his speaking ability that they put him in charge of creating propaganda. The party changed its name the next year, and a year after that, the young man became head of this young political party. Unfortunately, his government felt that this political group was somewhat of a risk due to their attempting to stage a revolution and imprisoned this fellow for some time the year after he became the group's leader. During his time in prison, he decided to write a book, partially to express his views, but also to hopefully sell copies to raise money for his legal defense. Fortunately for him, he was released after only a year in prison and resumed his position with this group. The group soon found itself the center of attention and had attracted a significant number of supporters. Not long afterwards, he took control of the country and expressed his views on how the country should be run, and elaborated on some of the same topics that had been discussed in his book.

Now, should the US government, or another government have intervened? Based on the information I provided, it seems the answer is no.

Now let me fill in the details I left out. The country was Germany. The 30 year old man was none other than Adolf Hitler, the party that he originally joined was called DAP, which later changed its name to the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (the party that was responsible for Nazism). While in prison, the book he wrote was none other than Mein Kampf. Lastly the views that he expressed once he took power via dictatorship was to persecute the Jews and any other individuals that were considered non-German or inferior (mainly by him). To make things worse, his supporters murdered all of the significant critics of his movement leaving very little opposition within the country.

Should a government step in and do something? Well, let's look at what governments actually did. Despite Germany's breach of the Treaty of Versailles by rearming itself, Britain and France took a stance of appeasement. The West wasn't ready to take action despite the crimes against humanity that were taking place starting in 1933 with concentration camps. It wasn't until Germany aligned itself with Japan and Italy giving birth to WWII that the West got off its butt and did something.

From 1933-1945 somewhere between 11-17 million people were murdered in cold blood. People such as my aunt's father who was a child at the time, watched his parents get murdered execution style with a pistol. Those who weren't murdered directly, were murdered indirectly by being forced into slave labor in unsanitary conditions and being expected to work for an impossible amount of time without rest. Of course, they had plenty of motivation, as there were trigger-happy soldiers nearby at all times to create job openings when they found a worker that wasn't working to their expectations as far as productivity. Some victims were subjected to the insanity of Dr. Josef Mengele, who was fascinated with medical research and performed experiments included placing subjects in pressure chambers, testing drugs on them, freezing them, attempting to change eye color by injecting chemicals into children's eyes, various unnecessary amputations, performing unnecessary sterilization and shock treatments on female concentration camp prisoners often resulting in the "patient's" death. One night Mengele got 14 twins, as his true passion was in studying twins, placed them on his polished marble dissection table and anesthetized them. He then checmically stopped their hearts. Mengele dissected every piece of the twins' bodies to indulge his curiosity.

Now that we know that we're talking about more or less the most evil people to ever exist, would you still maintain that we should simply respect Adolf Hitler as a legitimate leader of a sovereign nation, no matter what we think, (as you say) and allow his henchmen to indulge their sick fantasies? I say no. While hindsight is 20/20, the world had plenty of evidence of what was going on and that it was only going to get worse. Had some military unit stepped in and ended things early, before they got out of control and WWII started, not only could WWII possibly have been averted, but millions upon millions of lives would have been saved.

I feel that in some ways, this example is analogous to what is going on right now with various members of the Iranian government. All you have to do is take a look at what some have said when expressing their views. We already have violence towards the opposition and critics. If we just ignore what is going on and take the stance of respecting his leadership, then we haven't learned from history. How long will we just sit and wait? Unfortunately, my guess, is too long and in some ways history will repeat itself.

No disrespect meant to you Ut0pia. This is just an intellectual discussion afterall.
post #26 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by LawGuy View Post
Let's say, back in 1919 a relatively young 30 year old foreign intelligence officer and spy infiltrates a small political group. It only consists of a few members, but the officer is so taken with the group that instead of reporting back to military intelligence commanders, he joins the group, becoming their seventh member. They were so impressed with his speaking ability that they put him in charge of creating propaganda. The party changed its name the next year, and a year after that, the young man became head of this young political party. Unfortunately, his government felt that this political group was somewhat of a risk due to their attempting to stage a revolution and imprisoned this fellow for some time the year after he became the group's leader. During his time in prison, he decided to write a book, partially to express his views, but also to hopefully sell copies to raise money for his legal defense. Fortunately for him, he was released after only a year in prison and resumed his position with this group. The group soon found itself the center of attention and had attracted a significant number of supporters. Not long afterwards, he took control of the country and expressed his views on how the country should be run, and elaborated on some of the same topics that had been discussed in his book.

I see your point, and it would be great if disasters such as World war 2 could be avoided, there is no doubt about that...

Although I guess there is a price that comes with acting too quickly, and that means compromising other nations' sovereignty, which to me could result in even greater implications than avoiding a war.

As far as the paragraph I quoted- what you describe here to me sounds legitimate. If there had been a military intervention at that point, IMO the nation who intervenes is even more dangerous than the potential threatening dictator, because they are willing to disregard another nation's sovereignty, which is not what should be happening in world politics. So no, I don't think anyone should have intervened at that point. I do think after he breached the treaty of Versailles, there were grounds for military intervention, but not before then.
If I could go back in time with the knowledge I have today of what Hitler did, I would still not be in favor of stopping him as soon as he won the election. As soon as he started to build a larger military, then I'd say yes..But, that is only because of the treaty of Versailles.

Besides, what happened in world war 2 was not all Hitler's fault- a big part of it had to do with the alliances between the European powers that obligated them to interfere ...I think things would have went differently if there weren't such alliances. And I am talking just from the perspective of the security of the countries that Hitler invaded, not talking about the holocaust because things like the holocaust have happened in different parts of the world with no foreign intervention or help of any kind, and are still happening today, and still no outside country interferes, because they just have no grounds to do so.
post #27 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by ut0pia View Post

Besides, what happened in world war 2 was not all Hitler's fault- a big part of it had to do with the alliances between the European powers that obligated them to interfere ...I think things would have went differently if there weren't such alliances. And I am talking just from the perspective of the security of the countries that Hitler invaded, not talking about the holocaust because things like the holocaust have happened in different parts of the world with no foreign intervention or help of any kind, and are still happening today, and still no outside country interferes, because they just have no grounds to do so.
Please elaborate why you think "WWII was not all Hitler's fault."
post #28 of 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
Please elaborate why you think "WWII was not all Hitler's fault."
Sorry, bad phrasing on my part, I meant there was Mussolini in Italy and all the rest of the countries on his side .....so it's not all Hitler's doing although he started it..

I guess what I was trying to say was that, he started it and it wouldn't happened unless he did, but the way in which it played out was not all because of what he did.
post #29 of 41
Lawguy- I should add that honestly I do see how the situation today with Iran is comparable to WWII. It is truly scary.
But I think if we did interfere, we would be called the bad guys. And might even provoke even more hatred and even more terrorist acts against us, because he's not the only one...
Just IMHO....
post #30 of 41
Something to consider; If the United States were to set a course of action consisting of "clandestine regime elimination"; then there wouldn't be much room to complain when it comes back, quid pro quo.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Can somebody just take him out already?!