TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › The National Tea Party Convention
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The National Tea Party Convention - Page 2

post #31 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberThe Bobcat View Post
Obama has ALREADY failed IMO. He will continue to fail for the rest of his term.
Wow, now we have someone with a crystal ball here! Say what is tonight's winning lottery numbers??? I repeat, Ronald Reagan was considered a one termer for quite a while. In fact the approval ratings for both at this juncture match! It ain't over 'til it's over!
post #32 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Franz View Post
Wow, now we have someone with a crystal ball here!
We sure do If Obama continues on this path, he will fail, that is a given.
post #33 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberThe Bobcat View Post
We sure do If Obama continues on this path, he will fail, that is a given.
Hmmm, looks like you qualified your statement a bit!!!
post #34 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Franz View Post
Wow, now we have someone with a crystal ball here! Say what is tonight's winning lottery numbers??? I repeat, Ronald Reagan was considered a one termer for quite a while. In fact the approval ratings for both at this juncture match! It ain't over 'til it's over!

Yeah, kind of reminds you of this, doesn't it?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDOAmJYFFA
post #35 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
Yeah, kind of reminds you of this, doesn't it?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDOAmJYFFA

Again YouTube the cultural icon! The few times I have been there I was so turned off by the guttural and crass language in the "reviews" that I decided to skip that site forever. But if that is where you get your jollies go ahead honey!
post #36 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Franz View Post
Again YouTube the cultural icon! The few times I have been there I was so turned off by the guttural and crass language in the "reviews" that I decided to skip that site forever. But if that is where you get your jollies go ahead honey!
Youtube is where you go to find video of politicians hypocrisy. LOL Don't blame Youtube for the words of politicians, Youtube didn't tell the politicians how to make fools of themselves, they did that all by themselves.

BTW, just wanted to inform you I am not like some posters, in the past here, that get all offended when people call them, "honey" or "kiddo" so it's all good.
post #37 of 58
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
Youtube is where you go to find video of politicians hypocrisy. LOL Don't blame Youtube for the words of politicians, Youtube didn't tell the politicians how to make fools of themselves, they did that all by themselves.

BTW, just wanted to inform you I am not like some posters, in the past here, that get all offended when people call them, "honey" or "kiddo" so it's all good.
All sorts of hypocrisy...like Palin at the convention, making deriding jokes about Obama and his teleprompter, all the while reading from the crib notes she had written on the palm of her hand. It's on Youtube as well
post #38 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippymjp View Post
All sorts of hypocrisy...like Palin at the convention, making deriding jokes about Obama and his teleprompter, all the while reading from the crib notes she had written on the palm of her hand. It's on Youtube as well

LOL! I loved the crib, "raise the spirit of Americans" she had to REMIND herself of THAT!!! Ya gotta HAND it to her!
post #39 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2dogmom View Post
They aren't freebies, but some people get a lot more out of those programs than they paid into them. So they are in fact a redistribution of wealth. Sounds pretty socialistic to me.
Especially those senior citizens who are still collecting Social Security because, if we do the math in true capitalist ways, the actual small amounts they contributed to their accounts were according to the prevailing wages & costs of living those many years ago, versus the extra long years they have survived due to so many factors, such as medical advancements, healthier housing, etc. , have been spent years ago and they are now being supported directly by dollars that younger generations have contributed to the system.
Oh, and let's not forget those disabled young adults who haven't contributed a darn thing to their SSI accounts, and the parents who worked less cuz they had to care for said child have not put in what they are taking out of the system.
Oh, yes, whine all about it to a Californian who knows that for the longest time, for every $1 a Californian puts into the federal coffers, s/he would benefit a whopping .58-.63. but, hey, things are better now, for that $1, we CAs now benefit an average of .75 And yet, California is known as the place of liberal radicals who actually don't seem to mind thinking of the greater good of all.
post #40 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsknowme View Post
Especially those senior citizens who are still collecting Social Security because, if we do the math in true capitalist ways, the actual small amounts they contributed to their accounts were according to the prevailing wages & costs of living those many years ago, versus the extra long years they have survived due to so many factors, such as medical advancements, healthier housing, etc. , have been spent years ago and they are now being supported directly by dollars that younger generations have contributed to the system.
Yes, and as those younger people age, they will be supported by the new generations contributing money.
post #41 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippymjp View Post
All sorts of hypocrisy...like Palin at the convention, making deriding jokes about Obama and his teleprompter, all the while reading from the crib notes she had written on the palm of her hand. It's on Youtube as well
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Franz View Post
LOL! I loved the crib, "raise the spirit of Americans" she had to REMIND herself of THAT!!! Ya gotta HAND it to her!


Well, seeing as how Barack has his speeches composed FOR him and read them off a telprompter I think I will take Sarah's memorized speeches.

So, she wrote a few points on her hand.



http://thesuccessmantra.com/10-ways-...munication.php

Quote:
10. Preparation. Make the best out of preparation rather than just scribbling notes and often in a hurried panic. Some people like to write things down on index cards, while other resort to being a little more silly as they look at their notes written on the palm of their hand (not for clammy hands, please). Just be comfortable with what you know since you enjoy your work.
post #42 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
Well, seeing as how Barack has his speeches composed FOR him and read them off a telprompter I think I will take Sarah's memorized speeches.

So, she wrote a few points on her hand.



http://thesuccessmantra.com/10-ways-...munication.php
Again she had to REMIND herself to "raise the spirit of Americans'---that's like having to remind yourself to say "sorry for your loss at a funeral."

What a lame brain she is.
post #43 of 58
[quote=ckblv;2819323]Well, seeing as how Barack has his speeches composed FOR him and read them off a telprompter I think I will take Sarah's memorized speeches.

So, she wrote a few points on her hand.


http://www.newsweek.com/id/84756 (I added the bold)

Quote:
Jon Favreau has the worst and the best job in political speechwriting. His boss is a best-selling author who doesn't really need his help, having written the 2004 speech that catapulted him onto the national stage. At the same time, the same boss also happens to be capable of delivering a speech in ways that can give his audience the goosebumps.
If Ms. Palin has her speech memorized, why did she keep looking down at the podium? And why are teleprompters such a big issue anyway? I think its a manufactured issue, because most public figures use them these days.

Can someone point me to the text of Sarah Palin's tea party speech? No You Tube, please, I want the text. Thanks.
post #44 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by catsknowme View Post
Especially those senior citizens who are still collecting Social Security because, if we do the math in true capitalist ways, the actual small amounts they contributed to their accounts were according to the prevailing wages & costs of living those many years ago, versus the extra long years they have survived due to so many factors, such as medical advancements, healthier housing, etc. , have been spent years ago and they are now being supported directly by dollars that younger generations have contributed to the system.
Oh, and let's not forget those disabled young adults who haven't contributed a darn thing to their SSI accounts, and the parents who worked less cuz they had to care for said child have not put in what they are taking out of the system.
Oh, yes, whine all about it to a Californian who knows that for the longest time, for every $1 a Californian puts into the federal coffers, s/he would benefit a whopping .58-.63. but, hey, things are better now, for that $1, we CAs now benefit an average of .75 And yet, California is known as the place of liberal radicals who actually don't seem to mind thinking of the greater good of all.
Oh yes, for sure, the State of Californina should serve as a lesson to all of us. It is a regular beacon of light in the darkness.

I'm sorry Barack's health care plan, that rationed care for old people, didn't work out for you, maybe you could have gotten rid of some of those selfish old geezers that have the audacity to live so long.
post #45 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Franz View Post
Again she had to REMIND herself to "raise the spirit of Americans'---that's like having to remind yourself to say "sorry for your loss at a funeral."

What a lame brain she is.
Ahhhhh, reduced to name calling, now THAT will really leave a mark.

How terrible of her to write a few words on her hand, did you see the words she had the NERVE to write on her hand yesterday? I was SO offended, I just wanted to SCREAM!!!!
She actually wrote, "Hi Mom" on her hand, isn't that just the limit!!!
post #46 of 58
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
Oh yes, for sure, the State of Californina should serve as a lesson to all of us. It is a regular beacon of light in the darkness.

I'm sorry Barack's health care plan, that rationed care for old people, didn't work out for you, maybe you could have gotten rid of some of those selfish old geezers that have the audacity to live so long.
But giving old people health care at all, beyond the amount they contributed, is a social (socialist) program. Isn't that a bad thing? I mean, "socialism" has been used as a "scary buzz word" against Obama for years.
post #47 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippymjp View Post
But giving old people health care at all, beyond the amount they contributed, is a social (socialist) program. Isn't that a bad thing? I mean, "socialism" has been used as a "scary buzz word" against Obama for years.
As far as I am concerned, the United States Government can give me back all the money I have paid in to Medicare and Social Security for the last forty years, with an agreed upon, fair amount of interest and they don't have to give me anything. No Social Security, no Medi-Care, no nothing. I would be ALL OVER that.

Cripe, I would probably do it without the interest.
post #48 of 58
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
As far as I am concerned, the United States Government can give me back all the money I have paid in to Medicare and Social Security for the last forty years, with an agreed upon, fair amount of interest and they don't have to give me anything. No Social Security, no Medi-Care, no nothing. I would be ALL OVER that.

Cripe, I would probably do it without the interest.
If they were to do that, then a large number of the seniors would be out of money within 3 years, if that long. The average contribution in medicare taxes equates to roughly 5 months gross income. That would be the ultimate in "rationing care" for seniors. So if no health care after 2-3 years is acceptable, what is the problem with "rationing" over the long term?
post #49 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippymjp View Post
If they were to do that, then a large number of the seniors would be out of money within 3 years, if that long. The average contribution in medicare taxes equates to roughly 5 months gross income. That would be the ultimate in "rationing care" for seniors. So if no health care after 2-3 years is acceptable, what is the problem with "rationing" over the long term?
Congratulations to your teachers who taught you how to think for yourself and get informed!!! If only we could get the majority of the American public to do the same. It's frightening to me how people in Canada & Europe can take the time and make the effort to discover the facts of issues in our own country when we Americans just rely on mainstream media and react according to pundits
post #50 of 58
I would save that money and buy my own health care.
FTR, I have never been against health care reform, I AM against the Government take over of health care.

The Obama administration absolutely refuses to start small. I have repeated the things (things Barack, himself has said but won't do) that government could do to make health care more affordable.


As far as social security now putting out more than it takes in, well DUH! President Bush tried hard to address this and do something about it immediately after he got re-elected in 2004, SIX years ago. There was a public clamor against his ideas.

It is not rocket science, TAKE THE DARN CAP OFF. That would help, at least.
post #51 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
I would save that money and buy my own health care.
Quote:
Let’s start with a typical person who was born in 1944, began work at age 21 in 1965, and in 2009 retired at age 65 and enrolled in Medicare. Over the course of his life he paid the Medicare tax out of his wages (see here for historical tax rates). According to the 2009 Medicare Trustees Report, the average Medicare benefit per person in 2008 was $11,012. From this, we subtract the average Medicare premium of $1,288 to produce an average net benefit of $9,724. I’ll assume that this person collects the average Medicare benefit from age 65 through age 83 (his life expectancy as of age 65).

But unlike Social Security benefits, which increase only to keep up with inflation, Medicare benefits grow in real terms. The Medicare Trustees project that health costs will grow around 1 percentage point faster than the growth of per capita GDP, which in turn they project will grow around 1.3 percent faster than inflation over the next 15 years. So I assume that real Medicare benefits will increase by 2.3 percent each year.

To make taxes and benefits comparable, I convert each to present value terms, assuming a real interest rate of 3 percent. This means that taxes paid in the past have 3 percent interest added each year, to account for the fact that these taxes could otherwise have been invested. Likewise, future benefits have 3 percent annual interest deducted, to account for the fact that retirees must wait to receive them.

So what do we get? This typical person paid around $64,971 in Medicare payroll taxes over his lifetime. Likewise, after netting out Medicare premiums, he’ll receive around $173,886 in lifetime Medicare benefits. The net? He can expect to receive around $108,915 more in benefits than he paid in taxes over his lifetime.
http://blog.american.com/?p=3990

If you paid the average amount of approx $65,000 (in today's dollars) into the system and intend to spend that on health insurance premiums for a policy geared for an over 60 individual, you would last about 11 years. (And by the way I find the average monthly premium of $479 extremely low). Alternatively you could take your chances and not get any insurance and if you get hit with a big ticket illness, pay for it out of that $65000.
http://www.ahipresearch.org/pdfs/200...inalReport.pdf

Sounds like Medicare is a pretty good deal to me!
post #52 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
Ahhhhh, reduced to name calling, now THAT will really leave a mark.

How terrible of her to write a few words on her hand, did you see the words she had the NERVE to write on her hand yesterday? I was SO offended, I just wanted to SCREAM!!!!
She actually wrote, "Hi Mom" on her hand, isn't that just the limit!!!
As if you haven't named called Obama! Presidents/pols have been using teleprompters since they were invented, and when Obama does speak off the cuff he is well versed. Unlike Palin who during the campaign even failed during extensive coaching--well documented. Even now SHE admits to being ill-prepared! No wonder she needs "simple instruction" crib notes. She is style and no substance. It is said that she is too lazy to do her homework, she will be a flash in the pan, her laziness will catch up to her.
post #53 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Franz View Post
As if you haven't named called Obama! Presidents/pols have been using teleprompters since they were invented, and when Obama does speak off the cuff he is well versed. Unlike Palin who during the campaign even failed during extensive coaching--well documented. Even now SHE admits to being ill-prepared! No wonder she needs "simple instruction" crib notes. She is style and no substance. It is said that she is too lazy to do her homework, she will be a flash in the pan, her laziness will catch up to her.
I disagree with Barack's policies, but I don't call him names, but nice try.

Your opinion of Sarah Palin is just that, your opinion. I think she has already passed the time limit for the "flash in the pan" definition.

The fact of the matter is, she holds no political office and the left still shows their extreme fear of her. If she is so worthless, I am surprised she isn't ignored.

Vice President Biden is a real winner, I remember some of his remarks, I could post them if you like.
post #54 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2dogmom View Post
http://blog.american.com/?p=3990

If you paid the average amount of approx $65,000 (in today's dollars) into the system and intend to spend that on health insurance premiums for a policy geared for an over 60 individual, you would last about 11 years. (And by the way I find the average monthly premium of $479 extremely low). Alternatively you could take your chances and not get any insurance and if you get hit with a big ticket illness, pay for it out of that $65000.
http://www.ahipresearch.org/pdfs/200...inalReport.pdf

Sounds like Medicare is a pretty good deal to me!
Regarding the bolded portion, I'd say you're absolutely correct. You're using the 60-64 age range, but Medicare doesn't kick in until 65. It looks like the trend in premiums is exponentially increasing for each 5 year age group, so I'd guestimate it would be ~$600/month for 65-69 and $800/month for 70-74. Using that scenario, you'd run through $65,000 in just a little over 8 years, so you'd be on your own from 74 until the end of your life which, without medical care, would probably come a lot sooner than the current expected age of 83.
post #55 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippymjp View Post
I agree. It's time we pulled the plug on all those socialist programs like WIC, Welfare, Medicare, Social Security, prescription drug subsidies for seniors, etc. Because after all, anything following a socialist model is bad, right! Think of all the money we'd save. We could refund the pitiable amount people paid toward Medicare and let them "make it on their own". No more paying for anyone else.
AND free public education!
post #56 of 58
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockcat View Post
AND free public education!
Exactly. I agree. Conservatism has spoken! Socialist programs are bad!
post #57 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippymjp View Post
Exactly. I agree. Conservatism has spoken! Socialist programs are bad!
I'm going to come over there and slap you.
post #58 of 58
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckblv View Post
I'm going to come over there and slap you.
I cuddin' resist! I wuz set up for that one!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › The National Tea Party Convention