I've seen a lot of posts and articles suggesting that the goverment is incapable of running a public health insurance option and really, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
The Boston Globe letters to the Editor section from this past Sunday was full of comments on an article published at the end of August by a Globe employee. The gist of it is that she purchased a condo in Boston, got into trouble with her mortgage, and was unhappy with the assistance offered by the bailout program. She draws the conclusion that since the government wasn't able to help her with her personal mortgage crisis, she hates "to think what will happen with healthcare."
I have a strong opinion on this one but I don't want to prejudice anyone. What do you think? Do the actions and conclusions of this author seem reasonable to you?
http://www.boston.com/business/perso...rtgage_crisis/
The Boston Globe letters to the Editor section from this past Sunday was full of comments on an article published at the end of August by a Globe employee. The gist of it is that she purchased a condo in Boston, got into trouble with her mortgage, and was unhappy with the assistance offered by the bailout program. She draws the conclusion that since the government wasn't able to help her with her personal mortgage crisis, she hates "to think what will happen with healthcare."
I have a strong opinion on this one but I don't want to prejudice anyone. What do you think? Do the actions and conclusions of this author seem reasonable to you?
Quote:
| My personal mortgage crisis Thanks, Uncle Sam, for the empty promise of help. |

