I've been reading some extremely enlightening articles lately that made me so confused and shocked- about diet. Apparently, a low fat diet could be the source of all of our troubles regarding weight. Eating cholesterol and having a high cholesterol level in your blood might not be all that correlated as doctors try to stress.
And it all goes back to funding: the ones who fund these projects are the ones who are trying to push for their products to sell, it's all about grains and Monsanto again. And of course, they will do everything possible to establish a fact that could secure their profits.
It is so shocking that apparently the American Medical Association could be so totally wrong about heart disease, cholesterol levels..
The only thing they know for sure is that eating fast food does lead to an increased risk in heart disease. However, it has never been tested whether eating a high percentage of animal fat, not hydrogenated fat like the type that is found in fast food, and a low percentage of carbs in your diet is actually healthy. I am starting to believe that the above is the type of diet that humans have evolved to thrive on. The main important thing is not to eat a diet too high in protein because too much protein can lead to certain liver problems. The reason why a study has not been done on this:
The quotes are from this article:
What if it's all been a big fat lie
It's old but not much has changed. If you go on pubmed or a medical site you will not find any studies...
This is extremely interesting to me. I studied biology the first 2 years of my college life, but at the moment one of my fields is sociology of science (the other history as I've said before), and the main question we try to explore is what is good science vs. bad science, and how can we differentiate the two. Well- it's not what it seems most of the time, and in most cases it's all about funding, who gets to ask what question . And the ones who ask the question usually get the results they are looking for. In the 18th century, there was a study called craniology that had scientifically proven and established a fact that whites are superior to all other races because they have a wider skull. It was bogus of course but everyone believed it at the time. So it's not impossible for them to be wrong this time- I'm just trying to illustrate that with this example.I think there is a pretty big chance that they are wrong..
Oh and guess what: my parents are close to 50 and they just had to go and get their cholesterol checked and their health insurance company will determine whether they will raise their premiums depending on the risk factor of heart disease that they calculate..
Quote:
| In the intervening years, the N.I.H. spent several hundred million dollars trying to demonstrate a connection between eating fat and getting heart disease and, despite what we might think, it failed. Five major studies revealed no such link. A sixth, however, costing well over $100 million alone, concluded that reducing cholesterol by drug therapy could prevent heart disease. The N.I.H. administrators then made a leap of faith. Basil Rifkind, who oversaw the relevant trials for the N.I.H., described their logic this way: they had failed to demonstrate at great expense that eating less fat had any health benefits. But if a cholesterol-lowering drug could prevent heart attacks, then a low-fat, cholesterol-lowering diet should do the same. ''It's an imperfect world,'' Rifkind told me. ''The data that would be definitive is ungettable, so you do your best with what is available.'' |
It is so shocking that apparently the American Medical Association could be so totally wrong about heart disease, cholesterol levels..
The only thing they know for sure is that eating fast food does lead to an increased risk in heart disease. However, it has never been tested whether eating a high percentage of animal fat, not hydrogenated fat like the type that is found in fast food, and a low percentage of carbs in your diet is actually healthy. I am starting to believe that the above is the type of diet that humans have evolved to thrive on. The main important thing is not to eat a diet too high in protein because too much protein can lead to certain liver problems. The reason why a study has not been done on this:
Quote:
| To study the entire physiological system involves feeding real food to real human subjects for months or years on end, which is prohibitively expensive, ethically questionable (if you're trying to measure the effects of foods that might cause heart disease) and virtually impossible to do in any kind of rigorously controlled scientific manner. |
What if it's all been a big fat lie
It's old but not much has changed. If you go on pubmed or a medical site you will not find any studies...
This is extremely interesting to me. I studied biology the first 2 years of my college life, but at the moment one of my fields is sociology of science (the other history as I've said before), and the main question we try to explore is what is good science vs. bad science, and how can we differentiate the two. Well- it's not what it seems most of the time, and in most cases it's all about funding, who gets to ask what question . And the ones who ask the question usually get the results they are looking for. In the 18th century, there was a study called craniology that had scientifically proven and established a fact that whites are superior to all other races because they have a wider skull. It was bogus of course but everyone believed it at the time. So it's not impossible for them to be wrong this time- I'm just trying to illustrate that with this example.I think there is a pretty big chance that they are wrong..
Oh and guess what: my parents are close to 50 and they just had to go and get their cholesterol checked and their health insurance company will determine whether they will raise their premiums depending on the risk factor of heart disease that they calculate..








...






I get really annoyed at the concept of "fat free" cream -- pardon? Take the fat out and you have skim milk. To get something that looks like cream, you add junk. I wouldn't know if it tastes or behaves at all like cream, because I won't insult my body with it.

. Better than the fake stuff anyway: 


