or Connect
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Speech by Tim Robbins
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Speech by Tim Robbins

post #1 of 20
Thread Starter 
A Chill Wind is Blowing in This Nation
Transcript of the speech given by actor Tim Robbins to the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2003.

TIM ROBBINS: Thank you. And thanks for the invitation. I had originally been asked here to talk about the war and our current political situation, but I have instead chosen to hijack this opportunity and talk about baseball and show business. (Laughter.) Just kidding. Sort of.

I can't tell you how moved I have been at the overwhelming support I have received from newspapers throughout the country in these past few days. I hold no illusions that all of these journalists agree with me on my views against the war. While the journalists' outrage at the cancellation of our appearance in Cooperstown is not about my views, it is about my right to express these views. I am extremely grateful that there are those of you out there still with a fierce belief in constitutionally guaranteed rights. We need you, the press, now more than ever. This is a crucial moment for all of us.

For all of the ugliness and tragedy of 9-11, there was a brief period afterward where I held a great hope, in the midst of the tears and shocked faces of New Yorkers, in the midst of the lethal air we breathed as we worked at Ground Zero, in the midst of my children's terror at being so close to this crime against humanity, in the midst of all this, I held on to a glimmer of hope in the naive assumption that something good could come out of it.

I imagined our leaders seizing upon this moment of unity in America, this moment when no one wanted to talk about Democrat versus Republican, white versus black, or any of the other ridiculous divisions that dominate our public discourse. I imagined our leaders going on television telling the citizens that although we all want to be at Ground Zero, we can't, but there is work that is needed to be done all over America. Our help is needed at community centers to tutor children, to teach them to read. Our work is needed at old-age homes to visit the lonely and infirm; in gutted neighborhoods to rebuild housing and clean up parks, and convert abandoned lots to baseball fields. I imagined leadership that would take this incredible energy, this generosity of spirit and create a new unity in America born out of the chaos and tragedy of 9/11, a new unity that would send a message to terrorists everywhere: If you attack us, we will become stronger, cleaner, better educated, and more unified. You will strengthen our commitment to justice and democracy by your inhumane attacks on us. Like a Phoenix out of the fire, we will be reborn.

And then came the speech: You are either with us or against us. And the bombing began. And the old paradigm was restored as our leader encouraged us to show our patriotism by shopping and by volunteering to join groups that would turn in their neighbor for any suspicious behavior.

In the 19 months since 9-11, we have seen our democracy compromised by fear and hatred. Basic inalienable rights, due process, the sanctity of the home have been quickly compromised in a climate of fear. A unified American public has grown bitterly divided, and a world population that had profound sympathy and support for us has grown contemptuous and distrustful, viewing us as we once viewed the Soviet Union, as a rogue state.

This past weekend, Susan and I and the three kids went to Florida for a family reunion of sorts. Amidst the alcohol and the dancing, sugar-rushing children, there was, of course, talk of the war. And the most frightening thing about the weekend was the amount of times we were thanked for speaking out against the war because that individual speaking thought it unsafe to do so in their own community, in their own life. Keep talking, they said; I haven't been able to open my mouth.

A relative tells me that a history teacher tells his 11-year-old son, my nephew, that Susan Sarandon is endangering the troops by her opposition to the war. Another teacher in a different school asks our niece if we are coming to the school play. They're not welcome here, said the molder of young minds.

Another relative tells me of a school board decision to cancel a civics event that was proposing to have a moment of silence for those who have died in the war because the students were including dead Iraqi civilians in their silent prayer.

A teacher in another nephew's school is fired for wearing a T- shirt with a peace sign on it. And a friend of the family tells of listening to the radio down South as the talk radio host calls for the murder of a prominent anti-war activist. Death threats have appeared on other prominent anti-war activists' doorsteps for their views. Relatives of ours have received threatening e-mails and phone calls. And my 13-year-old boy, who has done nothing to anybody, has recently been embarrassed and humiliated by a sadistic creep who writes -- or, rather, scratches his column with his fingernails in dirt.

Susan and I have been listed as traitors, as supporters of Saddam, and various other epithets by the Aussie gossip rags masquerading as newspapers, and by their fair and balanced electronic media cousins, 19th Century Fox. (Laughter.) Apologies to Gore Vidal. (Applause.)

Two weeks ago, the United Way canceled Susan's appearance at a conference on women's leadership. And both of us last week were told that both we and the First Amendment were not welcome at the Baseball Hall of Fame.

A famous middle-aged rock-and-roller called me last week to thank me for speaking out against the war, only to go on to tell me that he could not speak himself because he fears repercussions from Clear Channel. "They promote our concert appearances," he said. "They own most of the stations that play our music. I can't come out against this war."

And here in Washington, Helen Thomas finds herself banished to the back of the room and uncalled on after asking Ari Fleischer whether our showing prisoners of war at Guantanamo Bay on television violated the Geneva Convention.

A chill wind is blowing in this nation. A message is being sent through the White House and its allies in talk radio and Clear Channel and Cooperstown. If you oppose this administration, there can and will be ramifications.

Every day, the air waves are filled with warnings, veiled and unveiled threats, spewed invective and hatred directed at any voice of dissent. And the public, like so many relatives and friends that I saw this weekend, sit in mute opposition and fear.

I am sick of hearing about Hollywood being against this war. Hollywood's heavy hitters, the real power brokers and cover-of-the- magazine stars, have been largely silent on this issue. But Hollywood, the concept, has always been a popular target.

I remember when the Columbine High School shootings happened. President Clinton criticized Hollywood for contributing to this terrible tragedy -- this, as we were dropping bombs over Kosovo. Could the violent actions of our leaders contribute somewhat to the violent fantasies of our teenagers? Or is it all just Hollywood and rock and roll?

I remember reading at the time that one of the shooters had tried to enlist to fight the real war a week before he acted out his war in real life at Columbine. I talked about this in the press at the time. And curiously, no one accused me of being unpatriotic for criticizing Clinton. In fact, the same radio patriots that call us traitors today engaged in daily personal attacks on their president during the war in Kosovo.

Today, prominent politicians who have decried violence in movies -- the "Blame Hollywooders," if you will -- recently voted to give our current president the power to unleash real violence in our current war. They want us to stop the fictional violence but are okay with the real kind.

And these same people that tolerate the real violence of war don't want to see the result of it on the nightly news. Unlike the rest of the world, our news coverage of this war remains sanitized, without a glimpse of the blood and gore inflicted upon our soldiers or the women and children in Iraq. Violence as a concept, an abstraction -- it's very strange.

As we applaud the hard-edged realism of the opening battle scene of "Saving Private Ryan," we cringe at the thought of seeing the same on the nightly news. We are told it would be pornographic. We want no part of reality in real life. We demand that war be painstakingly realized on the screen, but that war remain imagined and conceptualized in real life.

And in the midst of all this madness, where is the political opposition? Where have all the Democrats gone? Long time passing, long time ago. (Applause.) With apologies to Robert Byrd, I have to say it is pretty embarrassing to live in a country where a five-foot- one comedian has more guts than most politicians. (Applause.) We need leaders, not pragmatists that cower before the spin zones of former entertainment journalists. We need leaders who can understand the Constitution, congressman who don't in a moment of fear abdicate their most important power, the right to declare war to the executive branch. And, please, can we please stop the congressional sing-a- longs? (Laughter.)

In this time when a citizenry applauds the liberation of a country as it lives in fear of its own freedom, when an administration official releases an attack ad questioning the patriotism of a legless Vietnam veteran running for Congress, when people all over the country fear reprisal if they use their right to free speech, it is time to get angry. It is time to get fierce. And it doesn't take much to shift the tide. My 11-year-old nephew, mentioned earlier, a shy kid who never talks in class, stood up to his history teacher who was questioning Susan's patriotism. "That's my aunt you're talking about. Stop it." And the stunned teacher backtracks and began stammering compliments in embarrassment.

Sportswriters across the country reacted with such overwhelming fury at the Hall of Fame that the president of the Hall admitted he made a mistake and Major League Baseball disavowed any connection to the actions of the Hall's president. A bully can be stopped, and so can a mob. It takes one person with the courage and a resolute voice.

The journalists in this country can battle back at those who would rewrite our Constitution in Patriot Act II, or "Patriot, The Sequel," as we would call it in Hollywood. We are counting on you to star in that movie. Journalists can insist that they not be used as publicists by this administration. (Applause.) The next White House correspondent to be called on by Ari Fleischer should defer their question to the back of the room, to the banished journalist du jour. (Applause.) And any instance of intimidation to free speech should be battled against. Any acquiescence or intimidation at this point will only lead to more intimidation. You have, whether you like it or not, an awesome responsibility and an awesome power: the fate of discourse, the health of this republic is in your hands, whether you write on the left or the right. This is your time, and the destiny you have chosen.

We lay the continuance of our democracy on your desks, and count on your pens to be mightier. Millions are watching and waiting in mute frustration and hope - hoping for someone to defend the spirit and letter of our Constitution, and to defy the intimidation that is visited upon us daily in the name of national security and warped notions of patriotism.

Our ability to disagree, and our inherent right to question our leaders and criticize their actions define who we are. To allow those rights to be taken away out of fear, to punish people for their beliefs, to limit access in the news media to differing opinions is to acknowledge our democracy's defeat. These are challenging times. There is a wave of hate that seeks to divide us -- right and left, pro-war and anti-war. In the name of my 11-year-old nephew, and all the other unreported victims of this hostile and unproductive environment of fear, let us try to find our common ground as a nation. Let us celebrate this grand and glorious experiment that has survived for 227 years. To do so we must honor and fight vigilantly for the things that unite us -- like freedom, the First Amendment and, yes, baseball. (Applause.)

"The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western World. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity -- much less dissent." -- Gore Vidal
post #2 of 20
Thread Starter 
So....what do y'all think?
post #3 of 20
Sounds to me like he is prepping the political ground for himself.
post #4 of 20
I have always thought that he was well spoken. I feel that the speech was well written and thought provoking and I happen to agree with many of his points.
post #5 of 20
Blah, blah, blah. Does anyone really care what some actor thinks? I don't. Most of these Hollywood people barely finished high school. I would bet the farm that he did not actually write that speech, it was a script that some liberal speechwriter wrote. He and Susan Sarandon make me sick.
post #6 of 20
Just some info-I don't know about Tim Robbins, but Susan Sarandon did attend Catholic University in Washington DC at the same time my parents did. There are a lot of very well educated actors.
post #7 of 20
Thread Starter 
Even if someone else wrote it and even if he isn't a rocket scientist, the speech summarizes many of my concerns about the attacks on people who are simply stating their opinions about the war. One of the most important rights we have as US Americans is the right to speak out. The fact that people are being punished for doing just that goes against everything I, as a citizen of the USA, believe in.
post #8 of 20
Very eloquent. I happen to agree with most of what he said. As our political representatives aren't standing up for our civil rights, are in fact restricting them to a very disquieting extent, I'm glad somebody has the civil courage to do so. And by the way, whether somebody has a college degree says nothing about their intelligence.
post #9 of 20
I don't understand how you feel that they are being punished. I have freedom to believe what I believe too. If I don't agree with them, I have the freedom to say so. I have the freedom to not go see a movie they are in because I disagree with them. I don't think that's being punished. If you open up your mouth and say something that you know all people don't agree with, don't be suprised if people have a differing opinion. Don't forget this is a political speech that has a political spin. Meaning it meant to play on your emotions - and it does.
post #10 of 20
Well put, Nora!
post #11 of 20
I hate to say it, but the sort of things that are talked about in the speech have happened right here on this board. People have felt that they are not able to express their views without being attacked. Others (including me)have stifled their opinions after seeing what happened. Am I being a coward by not speaking out? Sure. But there is a difference between sharing disagreeing opinions and stifling dissent. The latter is what is happening here in America.
post #12 of 20
Christy,

This has always happened in America, because we are a free society. Even though we don't agree with what's being said, we have the uphold the right to say it. It's our first amendment right. Now if you don't have the courage (and I often don't have the courage) to say what you think because you don't want to deal with the consequences, I'm sorry, but that's the choice you make.
post #13 of 20
I understand that if I don't speak up, that's a choice I make for myself. But to have other people threaten to harm me for my views? That's when censorship comes in. And don't think it isn't happening. A co-worker of mine is involved in a university peace group. While putting up posters advocating peace they were physically threatened by a group of people who didn't agree with their views. Not just yelled at, but PHYSICALLY THREATENED. When things like this happen, do you really blame people for keeping their mouths shut?
post #14 of 20
Being physically threatened is another matter. A police matter. It is against the law to threaten bodily harm to anyone. I don't think anyone has been threatened on this board though, which is an example you brought up.
post #15 of 20
No, I didn't say that anyone was threatened on this board, and I apologize to anyone who interpreted it as such. I was trying to make the point (with the story of my co-worker) that the national mood surrounding the war has made it such that people would think it was acceptable to threaten someone who had a differing opinion. I don't think something like this just happens out of the clear blue sky. It grows out of situations like the ones Tim Robbins discussed in his speech.
post #16 of 20
I don't think that it is acceptable to threaten anyone with a dissenting opinion. I think most, and I stress most, people would agree with me.

I know many of the protesters have blocked major roads with their protests, which has caused many people anger and frustration at not being able to get to work or home on time. Road rage often affects us in negative ways. I'm not saying this was the case of your co-worker.

My point is that the people who where threatening her were doing so against the law. I think most people can have a calm discussion of differing issues without making threats or making cruel comments. I believe Tim Robbins said of the journalist who wrote the story about his son that if her saw that particular journalist, he would take him out. So much for peace.
post #17 of 20
IMO if someone published something about my child causing him hummiliation I would want to "take him out" too.

To be uninvited to functions and banned from school events because of your views is WRONG. To not allow children to want to include ALL those fallen in this war is also cruel and mean spirited.

I am not happy that we are in this war, and I feel for all those who are effected. I am sad for the people, animals, and destroyed homes that are left after the war is over. So much death because of something someone else did...
post #18 of 20
I agree with Christy....I feel as if we are supposed to agree to this war but if we say we do not agree, we are verbally attacked and criticised. So much for freedom of speech.
post #19 of 20
I wasn't going to respond to this particular subject anymore, however, I'm just curious to what you think free speech means. Do you think you have the right to say something and no one is going to disagree with you? I fully believe that someone will disagree with me on certain points. I respect your view, but I don't have to agree with it and I have the freedom to tell you so. I hope I'm not being offensive, but I do take issue with what people think is free speech.
post #20 of 20
Free speach is were I can say what I want, as long as it's not illegal, and you can tell me that you think you are crazy (not anyone here -- just you as a general idea of anyone who is not I). It does not mean that you have to agree with me, or that you have to not disagree. It does mean we can't threaten each other.
(I'm not much of a writer, high school education only)

That said --I don't think it matters one way or the other what an actor or rock singer or any kind of entertainer says -- it makes no difference on way or the other. I'm a viet nam leftover -- and I want to tell you that my politics or opinion were not influenced by John Lennon or John Wayne or any one else. Nor should they be, If you are old enough to know what is going on then you should be able to think for yourself. Many of the guys I grew up with were dodging the draft and this fool female enlisted. I was a fan of the Beatles and their music, but I tuned out when I came to politics. And I never watched a John Wayne movie in my life.
So I think that as citizens or private individuals entertainers can have any opinion they like, but in puplic they should stick to what they get payed for.

AS someone famous once said "I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. I don't know what W's thinking is, anymore than I knew what Nixon was thinking, but I do know that's what I and my buddies were thinking. I think that's what the troops are fighting for now.

Jude
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: IMO: In My Opinion
TheCatSite.com › Forums › General Forums › IMO: In My Opinion › Speech by Tim Robbins