Does anyone know of a link between hyperthyroidism and cancer? My Uncle has an 8 y/o tabby that I think is rail-thin (compared to my cats, anyway). She was finally diagnosed withy hyper-t about 9 months ago. His vet is doing bloodwork at the rate of every couple of weeks, which seems excessive to me. Three weeks ago, one vet at the clinic told my Uncle that Puddy-Tat's numbers had improved and maybe he could switch her meds to every other day. A couple of days ago, a different vet at the same clinic said her numbers were higher and they'd have to switch her meds to twice daily!
Uncle Joe is in his late 70s and very recently lost his wife, my beloved Aunt Mary, who made 99% of the decisions in the household. He seems at a loss as to how to handle all the conflicting info he's getting at the vets, and is constantly turning to me for help. I believe he's come to the conclusion that a) the different vets don't know what they're talking about or b) they're running lots of labs on Puddy that don't need to be done and taking his money. The last vet he spoke to a couple of days ago mentioned that with the hyper-t Puddy would probably develop cancer, too. Last month, a different vet said Puddy might have a parasite and to bring in a fecal sample (they didn't find a thing in it). It seems as if there's always some new problem going on with the kitty, but then the tests show everything is actually ok.
(boy, I'm getting carried away here!) Puddy is getting the transdermal gel in her ear, except when I 'cat sit' while Uncle Joe is out of town; I insisted he get the tablets, as it's just easier for me to dose her that way. Could giving the tablets versus using the gel make a difference in Puddy's numbers? I know the gel is measured in individual doses, so it makes me wonder if one is actually more effective than the other. (I don't know why Uncle Joe insists on doing the gel over the tabs, as he's told me he has a hard time getting it in her ear anyway) I'm confused as to how her numbers could go so completely goofy in a 2 weeks time frame (from meds every other day to meds 2x a day); I know Uncle Joe is dosing her like he's supposed to (at least, he says he is). I've tried to tell him nicely several times that maybe he should get a second opinion (I don't use the vet he does, and I trust mine completely). He's one of those people that can't make a decision without asking 14 other folks what they would do, which can be a little irritating after a while.
He says Puddy has had a better appetite lately, and has actually gained a pound in the last 6 weeks or so. I'll be cat-sitting again for 5 days next week, and his girl will be getting the tabs while I take care of her. I've asked him to get copies of her bloodwork for me; if nothing else, I can post them here and see if anyone can make any sense out of them.
So, after all this, does it seem as if his vet clinic is doing the right thing or just taking advantage of hiim? And, any input on giving the gel versus the tabs would be greatly appreciated. Also, is there really a link between hyper-t and cancer? Sorry about being so long-winded, but I'm totally confused.
Uncle Joe is in his late 70s and very recently lost his wife, my beloved Aunt Mary, who made 99% of the decisions in the household. He seems at a loss as to how to handle all the conflicting info he's getting at the vets, and is constantly turning to me for help. I believe he's come to the conclusion that a) the different vets don't know what they're talking about or b) they're running lots of labs on Puddy that don't need to be done and taking his money. The last vet he spoke to a couple of days ago mentioned that with the hyper-t Puddy would probably develop cancer, too. Last month, a different vet said Puddy might have a parasite and to bring in a fecal sample (they didn't find a thing in it). It seems as if there's always some new problem going on with the kitty, but then the tests show everything is actually ok.
(boy, I'm getting carried away here!) Puddy is getting the transdermal gel in her ear, except when I 'cat sit' while Uncle Joe is out of town; I insisted he get the tablets, as it's just easier for me to dose her that way. Could giving the tablets versus using the gel make a difference in Puddy's numbers? I know the gel is measured in individual doses, so it makes me wonder if one is actually more effective than the other. (I don't know why Uncle Joe insists on doing the gel over the tabs, as he's told me he has a hard time getting it in her ear anyway) I'm confused as to how her numbers could go so completely goofy in a 2 weeks time frame (from meds every other day to meds 2x a day); I know Uncle Joe is dosing her like he's supposed to (at least, he says he is). I've tried to tell him nicely several times that maybe he should get a second opinion (I don't use the vet he does, and I trust mine completely). He's one of those people that can't make a decision without asking 14 other folks what they would do, which can be a little irritating after a while.
He says Puddy has had a better appetite lately, and has actually gained a pound in the last 6 weeks or so. I'll be cat-sitting again for 5 days next week, and his girl will be getting the tabs while I take care of her. I've asked him to get copies of her bloodwork for me; if nothing else, I can post them here and see if anyone can make any sense out of them.
So, after all this, does it seem as if his vet clinic is doing the right thing or just taking advantage of hiim? And, any input on giving the gel versus the tabs would be greatly appreciated. Also, is there really a link between hyper-t and cancer? Sorry about being so long-winded, but I'm totally confused.