http://www.dispatch.com/live/content...shooting2.html
They aren't releasing the names, so I can't be 100% on whether he's actually a classmate, but from his age/neighborhood, I'm guessing it is. Oddly, I was less than a block away earlier today and didn't notice anything
Some background: that area is scary. The further east you go from campus, the worse and worse the neighborhood gets. There are two cross-streets that are kind of like boundaries; the first one you don't live past, the second one you don't walk past. This is the corner of the second one. I say this because I am completely unsurprised that he owned a gun, even though he isn't old enough to have one legally, and I also understand why he does.
And I am guessing, again, that he'll be found to have been within his rights, especially since it sounds like there were at least three robbers in his apartment while he (I suppose it could be a she) and someone else were home.
Even more weirdly, the same night this happened my boyfriend and I were talking about this case in Texas where the man called 911, decided they didn't come fast enough, and shot people who were burglarizing his neighbor's house as they were leaving in the front lawn.
I think its sad that anyone lose a life over possessions, but at the same time I can understand that in the moment you can feel that your life is threatened and it really is self-defense.
There's also the issue of the gun seeming to be illegally possessed. Should it matter? Do you guys think its right for it not to be a crime at all to kill someone who is robbing you?
Should you have to prove that you really felt you, and not just your stuff, was in danger?
This isn't a far-fetched distinction-- for instance, armored-car drivers have to carry guns and be licensed to use them by the police academy, but are not typically allowed to shoot anyone unless they feel the robber is going to hurt them.
They aren't releasing the names, so I can't be 100% on whether he's actually a classmate, but from his age/neighborhood, I'm guessing it is. Oddly, I was less than a block away earlier today and didn't notice anything

Some background: that area is scary. The further east you go from campus, the worse and worse the neighborhood gets. There are two cross-streets that are kind of like boundaries; the first one you don't live past, the second one you don't walk past. This is the corner of the second one. I say this because I am completely unsurprised that he owned a gun, even though he isn't old enough to have one legally, and I also understand why he does.
And I am guessing, again, that he'll be found to have been within his rights, especially since it sounds like there were at least three robbers in his apartment while he (I suppose it could be a she) and someone else were home.
Even more weirdly, the same night this happened my boyfriend and I were talking about this case in Texas where the man called 911, decided they didn't come fast enough, and shot people who were burglarizing his neighbor's house as they were leaving in the front lawn.
I think its sad that anyone lose a life over possessions, but at the same time I can understand that in the moment you can feel that your life is threatened and it really is self-defense.
There's also the issue of the gun seeming to be illegally possessed. Should it matter? Do you guys think its right for it not to be a crime at all to kill someone who is robbing you?
Should you have to prove that you really felt you, and not just your stuff, was in danger?
This isn't a far-fetched distinction-- for instance, armored-car drivers have to carry guns and be licensed to use them by the police academy, but are not typically allowed to shoot anyone unless they feel the robber is going to hurt them.






that sound often alone is enough to send people running


