There is a new House Bill being introduced into the Legislature in Colorado this session that is getting a lot of attention. (For anyone interested it is HB 1260)
It would raise the status of a pet from property to a companion and is the first Bill of it's kind in the nation. The laws recently passed in California state that you are a "guardian" of an animal, not just an "owner" but it is pretty much just a semantic difference in status. This Bill actually has some teeth and legal ramifications. As the law stands now, if your pet dies because of malpractice of a vet, caretaker or animal abuse the most you can sue for is the "fair market value" of the animal - what it would cost to replace it with an animal of similar breed and age. They are no more than property, treated in the court in the same way as your car, watch, wallet, etc. The new Bill would make a pet a "companion" which would allow compensation for malpractice, neglect, or abuse to take into account "loss of companionship." In other words, you could sue someone who kills or seriously injures your pet for up to $100,000. (Yes, that is the number they showed on the news.) Some Vet groups are already opposing this legislation because they say it will drive up the cost of veterinary care, and when people can't afford to care for their pets they will end up in shelters.
Any thoughts on this type of legisation?
It would raise the status of a pet from property to a companion and is the first Bill of it's kind in the nation. The laws recently passed in California state that you are a "guardian" of an animal, not just an "owner" but it is pretty much just a semantic difference in status. This Bill actually has some teeth and legal ramifications. As the law stands now, if your pet dies because of malpractice of a vet, caretaker or animal abuse the most you can sue for is the "fair market value" of the animal - what it would cost to replace it with an animal of similar breed and age. They are no more than property, treated in the court in the same way as your car, watch, wallet, etc. The new Bill would make a pet a "companion" which would allow compensation for malpractice, neglect, or abuse to take into account "loss of companionship." In other words, you could sue someone who kills or seriously injures your pet for up to $100,000. (Yes, that is the number they showed on the news.) Some Vet groups are already opposing this legislation because they say it will drive up the cost of veterinary care, and when people can't afford to care for their pets they will end up in shelters.
Any thoughts on this type of legisation?