Its suspected that Zorro has either a very bad bone infection, or bone cancer. He's getting tests done in two weeks to determine what it is. Right now the vets trying a different type of antibiotic, hoping that it will clear up the infection. If it is bone cancer, or if the bone infection is so bad that it has worn holes in the bone, the vet wants to amputate the leg to prevent it from spreading.
Here's my dilema. Zorro has a collapsed disk in his back, and therefor has back legs which are partially paralized. This makes walking a little more difficult for him since his back legs don't have much muscle, and have no stability. Its also a little painful.
I'm worried that if I amputate the leg(one of the front ones) his quality of life would be horrible since it would be even harder than it already is to walk. Right now he uses his front legs to support himself. I don't know what he would do if I took away one of them. I'm also worried that it would be more painful since he wouldn't be able to use his front legs to help out as much.
If you were in my situation, what would you do? Would you just let him live as long as possible until the infection was really bad, then put him down, or would you get the operation? I don't want him to be in constant pain. He's not even two years old yet and I hate to think of this, but I want to be prepared when the time comes so that if I have to make the decision, I'll have had plenty of time to think about it.
Your opinions are greatly appreciated.
Here's my dilema. Zorro has a collapsed disk in his back, and therefor has back legs which are partially paralized. This makes walking a little more difficult for him since his back legs don't have much muscle, and have no stability. Its also a little painful.
I'm worried that if I amputate the leg(one of the front ones) his quality of life would be horrible since it would be even harder than it already is to walk. Right now he uses his front legs to support himself. I don't know what he would do if I took away one of them. I'm also worried that it would be more painful since he wouldn't be able to use his front legs to help out as much.
If you were in my situation, what would you do? Would you just let him live as long as possible until the infection was really bad, then put him down, or would you get the operation? I don't want him to be in constant pain. He's not even two years old yet and I hate to think of this, but I want to be prepared when the time comes so that if I have to make the decision, I'll have had plenty of time to think about it.
Your opinions are greatly appreciated.